0

The full content of Annals is available to subscribers

Subscribe/Learn More  >
Reviews |

Coronary Angiography after Thrombolytic Therapy for Acute Myocardial Infarction

Eric J. Topol, MD; David R. Holmes, MD; and William J. Rogers, MD
[+] Article and Author Information

Grant Support: In part by grant HL38529-01 from the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute.

Requests for Reprints: Eric J. Topol, MD, Division of Cardiology, B1-F245, University of Michigan Medical Center, 1500 East Medical Center Drive, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-0022.

Current Author Addresses: Dr. Topol: Division of Cardiology, B1-F245, University of Michigan Medical Center, 1500 East Medical Center Drive, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-0022.

Dr. Holmes: Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street, Southwest, Rochester, MN 55902.

Dr. Rogers: 334 LHR Building, Department of Medicine, University of Alabama Medical Center, Birmingham, AL 35294.


© 1991 American College of PhysiciansAmerican College of Physicians


Ann Intern Med. 1991;114(10):877-885. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-114-10-877
Text Size: A A A
This excerpt has been provided in the absence of an abstract.

Purpose: To review the status of emergency, urgent, routine, and selective angiography after intravenous thrombolytic therapy.

Data Sources: Relevant English-language articles published from January 1985 to July 1990 were identified through MEDLINE.

Study Selection: For emergency angiography, four major randomized studies were reviewed and data from nine studies that incorporated rescue coronary angioplasty were pooled for metaanalysis. For urgent angiography, two controlled trials were reviewed. Comparisons of routine and selective angiography were done using data from two dedicated, large-scale, controlled trials and the ancillary findings of four other studies of reperfusion that incorporated angiography.

Data Extraction: The review emphasizes the findings from multicenter, randomized, controlled trials.

Data Synthesis: Emergency coronary angiography is done pri marily in preparation for primary or rescue angioplasty; the value of rescue angioplasty has yet to be assessed in a randomized trial, but technical success and reocclusion improve significantly after therapy with nonspecific plasminogen activators compared with relatively specific agents (success rate, 86% compared with 75%, respectively; P = 0. 03; reocclusion rate, 10.9% compared with 26.8%, respectively; P < 0.001). Urgent coronary angiography has value for treating recurrent ischemia, but patients who develop this complication after thrombolysis are likely to have a suboptimal outcome despite aggressive care. Studies support the use of either selective or routine angiography in uncomplicated patients after thrombolytic therapy; either approach is acceptable, but the former is more practical and may prove to be cost effective.

Conclusions: Optimal follow-up for patients with evolving myocardial infarction who receive thrombolysis may incorporate coronary angiography at various stages. Although our ability to noninvasively detect reperfusion, reocclusion, or viable but ischemic myocardium is limited at present, available data may assist in selecting a catheterization strategy.

...

First Page Preview

View Large
/>
First page PDF preview

Figures

Tables

References

Letters

NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).

Comments

Submit a Comment
Submit a Comment

Summary for Patients

Clinical Slide Sets

Terms of Use

The In the Clinic® slide sets are owned and copyrighted by the American College of Physicians (ACP). All text, graphics, trademarks, and other intellectual property incorporated into the slide sets remain the sole and exclusive property of the ACP. The slide sets may be used only by the person who downloads or purchases them and only for the purpose of presenting them during not-for-profit educational activities. Users may incorporate the entire slide set or selected individual slides into their own teaching presentations but may not alter the content of the slides in any way or remove the ACP copyright notice. Users may make print copies for use as hand-outs for the audience the user is personally addressing but may not otherwise reproduce or distribute the slides by any means or media, including but not limited to sending them as e-mail attachments, posting them on Internet or Intranet sites, publishing them in meeting proceedings, or making them available for sale or distribution in any unauthorized form, without the express written permission of the ACP. Unauthorized use of the In the Clinic slide sets will constitute copyright infringement.

Toolkit

Buy Now

to gain full access to the content and tools.

Want to Subscribe?

Learn more about subscription options

Advertisement
Related Articles
Related Point of Care
Topic Collections
PubMed Articles

Buy Now

to gain full access to the content and tools.

Want to Subscribe?

Learn more about subscription options

Forgot your password?
Enter your username and email address. We'll send you a reminder to the email address on record.
(Required)
(Required)