The full content of Annals is available to subscribers

Subscribe/Learn More  >
Academia and the Profession |

Career Differences between Primary Care and Traditional Trainees in Internal Medicine and Pediatrics

John Noble, MD; Robert H. Friedman, MD; Barbara Starfield, MD; Arlene Ash, PhD; and Charlyn Black, MD, ScD
[+] Article, Author, and Disclosure Information

Grant Support: In part by Contract No. HRSA 240-85-0048, Division of Medicine, Bureau of Health Professions, Health Resources and Services Administration, Department of Health and Human Services. Fellowship support was provided to Dr. Black by the National Health Research and Development Program of Canada.

Requests for Reprints: John Noble, MD, Section of General Internal Medicine, Boston City Hospital, 818 Harrison Avenue, Boston, MA 02118.

Current Author Addresses: Dr. Noble: Section of General Internal Medicine, Boston City Hospital, 818 Harrison Avenue, Boston, MA 02118. Drs. Friedman and Ash: Doctor's Office Building, Evans Medical Group, 720 Harrison Avenue, Boston, MA 02118. Dr. Starfield: Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins University, Hampton House, 624 North Broadway, Baltimore, MD 21205-1901.

Dr. Black: Community Health Sciences, S101-750 Bannalyne Avenue, Winnipeg, Manitoba R3E 0W3, Canada.

© 1992 American College of PhysiciansAmerican College of Physicians

Ann Intern Med. 1992;116(6):482-487. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-116-6-482
Text Size: A A A

Objective: To assess the relation of Primary Care Residency Training to career choice, board certification, and practice location of internists and pediatricians.

Design: Cohort study with up to 8 years of follow-up.

Setting: The United States.

Participants: The 17 933 residents trained in all internal medicine (13 750) and pediatrics (4183) residency programs between 1977 and 1982 were studied using information from the National Resident Matching Program, the AMA Physician Masterfile, the Area Resource File, and a telephone survey.

Measurements: Career choice, board certification, and practice location were studied in relation to five explanatory variables: type of residency (primary care or traditional track), gender, year of medical school graduation, educational orientation of the teaching hospital, and medical school prestige.

Main Results: Graduates of primary care residency training programs chose careers in generalist primary care significantly more often than did graduates of traditional tracks in both internal medicine (72% compared with 54%) and pediatrics (88% and 81%, respectively; P < 0.001 for both values). Board certification rates in internal medicine were statistically higher for graduates of primary care training programs (80%) than for graduates of traditional programs (76%, P = 0.002) but were not statistically significant for both groups of pediatric graduates. Graduates of primary care programs in pediatrics and internal medicine practiced in medically less served communities more often than did graduates of traditional programs.

Conclusion: Graduates of primary care residency training programs in internal medicine and pediatrics differ from graduates of traditional residency programs in career choices, board certification rates, and practice locations.





Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).


Submit a Comment/Letter
Submit a Comment/Letter

Summary for Patients

Clinical Slide Sets

Terms of Use

The In the Clinic® slide sets are owned and copyrighted by the American College of Physicians (ACP). All text, graphics, trademarks, and other intellectual property incorporated into the slide sets remain the sole and exclusive property of the ACP. The slide sets may be used only by the person who downloads or purchases them and only for the purpose of presenting them during not-for-profit educational activities. Users may incorporate the entire slide set or selected individual slides into their own teaching presentations but may not alter the content of the slides in any way or remove the ACP copyright notice. Users may make print copies for use as hand-outs for the audience the user is personally addressing but may not otherwise reproduce or distribute the slides by any means or media, including but not limited to sending them as e-mail attachments, posting them on Internet or Intranet sites, publishing them in meeting proceedings, or making them available for sale or distribution in any unauthorized form, without the express written permission of the ACP. Unauthorized use of the In the Clinic slide sets will constitute copyright infringement.


Buy Now for $42.00

to gain full access to the content and tools.

Want to Subscribe?

Learn more about subscription options

Related Articles
Topic Collections
PubMed Articles
Forgot your password?
Enter your username and email address. We'll send you a reminder to the email address on record.