The full content of Annals is available to subscribers

Subscribe/Learn More  >
Medicine and Public Policy |

Effects of Offering Advance Directives on Medical Treatments and Costs

Lawrence J. Schneiderman, MD; Richard Kronick, PhD; Robert M. Kaplan, PhD; John P. Anderson, PhD; and Robert D. Langer, MD, MPH
[+] Article, Author, and Disclosure Information

Grant Support: By grant R18 HSO5617 from the Agency of Health Care Policy Research.

Requests for Reprints: Lawrence J. Schneiderman, MD, Community and Family Medicine, 0622, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, CA 92093-0622.

Current Author Addresses: Drs. Schneiderman, Kronick, Kaplan, Anderson, and Langer: Division of Health Care Services, University of California, San Diego School of Medicine, La Jolla, CA 92093-0622.

© 1992 American College of PhysiciansAmerican College of Physicians

Ann Intern Med. 1992;117(7):599-606. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-117-7-599
Text Size: A A A

Objective: To examine the effects of advance directives on medical treatments and on patient satisfaction and well-being and to determine whether the enhancement of patient autonomy through advance directives provides a more ethically feasible approach to cost control than does the imposition of limits through rationing.

Design: Randomized, controlled trial.

Setting: University and Veterans Affairs medical center.

Patients: Two hundred and four patients with life-threatening illnesses, 100 of whom died after enrollment in the study.

Intervention: Patients randomly assigned to the experimental group were offered the California Durable Power of Attorney (a typical proxy-instruction directive), and patients assigned to the control group were not offered the advance directive. Hospital admissions were monitored to assure that a summary of the document was present in the active medical record at each hospitalization.

Measurements: Cognitive function, patient satisfaction, pyschological well-being, health locus of control, sense of coherence, health-related quality of life, receipt of medical treatments, and medical treatment charges.

Results: No significant differences were found between advance-directive and control groups regarding psychosocial variables, health outcome variables, and medical treatments or charges. Patients offered an advance directive had an average hospital stay of 40.8 days (95% CI, 32.2 to 49.4 days), compared with an average of 33.1 days (95% CI, 26.0 to 40.2 days) for controls. Patients offered an advance directive were charged an average of $19 502 (95% CI, $13 030 to $25 974) for medical treatments in the last month of life compared with $19 700 (95% CI, $13 704 to $25 696) for controls.

Conclusions: Despite claims that public demand for longer life accounts for rising medical costs, most surveys suggest that patients are calling for less, not more, of the expensive, high-technology treatment often used in terminal phases of illness. Executing the California Durable Power of Attorney for Health Care and having a summary copy placed in the patient's medical record had no significant positive or negative effect on a patient's well-being, health status, medical treatments, or medical treatment charges.





Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).


Submit a Comment/Letter
Submit a Comment/Letter

Summary for Patients

Clinical Slide Sets

Terms of Use

The In the Clinic® slide sets are owned and copyrighted by the American College of Physicians (ACP). All text, graphics, trademarks, and other intellectual property incorporated into the slide sets remain the sole and exclusive property of the ACP. The slide sets may be used only by the person who downloads or purchases them and only for the purpose of presenting them during not-for-profit educational activities. Users may incorporate the entire slide set or selected individual slides into their own teaching presentations but may not alter the content of the slides in any way or remove the ACP copyright notice. Users may make print copies for use as hand-outs for the audience the user is personally addressing but may not otherwise reproduce or distribute the slides by any means or media, including but not limited to sending them as e-mail attachments, posting them on Internet or Intranet sites, publishing them in meeting proceedings, or making them available for sale or distribution in any unauthorized form, without the express written permission of the ACP. Unauthorized use of the In the Clinic slide sets will constitute copyright infringement.


Buy Now for $42.00

to gain full access to the content and tools.

Want to Subscribe?

Learn more about subscription options

Related Articles
Topic Collections
PubMed Articles
Forgot your password?
Enter your username and email address. We'll send you a reminder to the email address on record.