0

The full content of Annals is available to subscribers

Subscribe/Learn More  >
Medicine and Public Policy |

The Influence of Standard of Care and Severity of Injury on the Resolution of Medical Malpractice Claims

Mark I. Taragin, MD, MPH; Laura R. Willett, MD; Adam P. Wilczek, BA; Richard Trout, PhD; and Jeffrey L. Carson, MD
[+] Article and Author Information

Requests for Reprints: Mark I. Taragin, MD, MPH, University of Medicine & Dentistry of New Jersey, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Division of General Internal Medicine, 97 Paterson Street, New Brunswick, NJ 08903-0019.

Current Author Addresses: Drs. Taragin, Willett, and Carson: Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Medicine & Dentistry of New Jersey, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, 97 Paterson Street, New Brunswick, NJ 08903-0019.

Mr. Wilczek: Medical Inter-Insurance Exchange, 2 Princess Road, Lawrenceville, NJ 08648.

Dr. Trout: Statistics Department, Cook College, P.O. Box 231, New Brunswick, NJ 08903.


© 1992 American College of PhysiciansAmerican College of Physicians


Ann Intern Med. 1992;117(9):780-784. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-117-9-780
Text Size: A A A

Objective: To explore how frequently physicians lose medical malpractice cases despite providing standard care and to assess whether severity of patient injury influences the frequency of plaintiff payment.

Design: Retrospective cohort study.

Setting: Physicians from the state of New Jersey insured by one insurance company from 1977 to 1992.

Participants: A total of 12 829 physicians involved in 8231 closed malpractice cases.

Measurements: Physician care and claim severity were prospectively determined by the insurance company using a standard process.

Results: Physician care was considered defensible in 62% of the cases and indefensible in 25% of the cases, in almost half of which the physician admitted error. In the remaining 13% of cases, it was unclear whether physician care was defensible. The plaintiff received a payment in 43% of all cases. Payment was made 21% of the time if physician care was considered defensible, 91% if considered indefensible, and 59% if considered unclear. The severity of the injury was classified as low, medium, or high in 28%, 47%, and 25% of the cases, respectively. Severity of injury had a small but significant association (P < 0.001) with the frequency of plaintiff payment (low severity, 39%; medium severity, 43%; and high severity, 47%). The severity of injury was not associated with the payment rate in cases resolved by a jury (low severity, 23%; medium severity, 25%; and high severity, 23%).

Conclusions: In malpractice cases, physicians provide care that is usually defensible. The defensibility of the case and not the severity of patient injury predominantly influences whether any payment is made. Even in cases that require a jury verdict, the severity of patient injury has little effect on whether any payment is made. Our findings suggest that unjustified payments are probably uncommon.

Figures

Tables

References

Letters

NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).

Comments

Submit a Comment
Submit a Comment

Summary for Patients

Clinical Slide Sets

Terms of Use

The In the Clinic® slide sets are owned and copyrighted by the American College of Physicians (ACP). All text, graphics, trademarks, and other intellectual property incorporated into the slide sets remain the sole and exclusive property of the ACP. The slide sets may be used only by the person who downloads or purchases them and only for the purpose of presenting them during not-for-profit educational activities. Users may incorporate the entire slide set or selected individual slides into their own teaching presentations but may not alter the content of the slides in any way or remove the ACP copyright notice. Users may make print copies for use as hand-outs for the audience the user is personally addressing but may not otherwise reproduce or distribute the slides by any means or media, including but not limited to sending them as e-mail attachments, posting them on Internet or Intranet sites, publishing them in meeting proceedings, or making them available for sale or distribution in any unauthorized form, without the express written permission of the ACP. Unauthorized use of the In the Clinic slide sets will constitute copyright infringement.

Toolkit

Buy Now

to gain full access to the content and tools.

Want to Subscribe?

Learn more about subscription options

Advertisement
Related Articles
Topic Collections

Buy Now

to gain full access to the content and tools.

Want to Subscribe?

Learn more about subscription options

Forgot your password?
Enter your username and email address. We'll send you a reminder to the email address on record.
(Required)
(Required)