0

The full content of Annals is available to subscribers

Subscribe/Learn More  >
Academia and the Profession |

Measured Enthusiasm: Does the Method of Reporting Trial Results Alter Perceptions of Therapeutic Effectiveness?

C. David Naylor, MD, DPhil; Erluo Chen, MB, MPH; and Barry Strauss, MSc, MD
[+] Article and Author Information

Grant Support: Dr. Naylor receives salary support from Career Scientist Award 02377 of the Ontario Ministry of Health and from the Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences in Ontario.

Requests for Reprints: C. David Naylor, MD, DPhil, Sunnybrook Clinical Epidemiology, A443, 2075 Bayview Avenue, North York, Ontario M4N 3M5, Canada.

Current Author Addresses: Drs. Naylor and Chen: c/o Sunnybrook Clinical Epidemiology, A443, 2075 Bayview Avenue, North York, Ontario M4N 3M5, Canada.

Dr. Strauss: c/o Department of Medicine, Sunnybrook Health Science Centre, 2075 Bayview Avenue, North York, Ontario M4N 3M5, Canada.


Ann Intern Med. 1992;117(11):916-921. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-117-11-916
Text Size: A A A

Objective: To compare clinicians' ratings of therapeutic effectiveness when different trial end points were presented as percent reductions in relative compared with absolute risk and as numbers of patients treated to avoid one adverse outcome.

Design: Survey, with random allocation of two questionnaires.

Setting: Toronto teaching hospitals.

Respondents: Convenience sample of 100 faculty and housestaff in internal medicine and family medicine.

Intervention: One questionnaire presented results for three end points of the Helsinki Heart Study as separate drug trials using only absolute differences in events; the other showed the same end points as relative differences. Both questionnaires included a fourth "trial," showing person-years of treatment needed to prevent one myocardial infarction.

Main Outcome Measure: The "trials" were each rated on an 11-point scale, from treatment "harmful" to "very effective."

Results: Respondents' ratings of effectiveness varied with the end point. Controlling for end point, ratings of effectiveness by the 50 participants receiving absolute event data were lower than those by 50 participants responding to relative risk reductions (P < 0.001); however, no end-point difference was more than 0.6 scale points. For a "trial" reporting that 77 persons were treated for 5 years to prevent one myocardial infarction, mean ratings were 2.3 or 1.8 scale points lower, respectively (both P < 0.001), than when the same data were shown as relative or absolute risk reductions.

Conclusions: Clinicians' views of drug therapies are affected by the common use of relative risk reductions in both trial reports and advertisements, by end-point emphasis, and, above all, by underuse of summary measures that relate treatment burden to therapeutic yields in a clinically relevant manner.

Topics

perception

Figures

Tables

References

Letters

NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).

Comments

Submit a Comment
Submit a Comment

Summary for Patients

Clinical Slide Sets

Terms of Use

The In the Clinic® slide sets are owned and copyrighted by the American College of Physicians (ACP). All text, graphics, trademarks, and other intellectual property incorporated into the slide sets remain the sole and exclusive property of the ACP. The slide sets may be used only by the person who downloads or purchases them and only for the purpose of presenting them during not-for-profit educational activities. Users may incorporate the entire slide set or selected individual slides into their own teaching presentations but may not alter the content of the slides in any way or remove the ACP copyright notice. Users may make print copies for use as hand-outs for the audience the user is personally addressing but may not otherwise reproduce or distribute the slides by any means or media, including but not limited to sending them as e-mail attachments, posting them on Internet or Intranet sites, publishing them in meeting proceedings, or making them available for sale or distribution in any unauthorized form, without the express written permission of the ACP. Unauthorized use of the In the Clinic slide sets will constitute copyright infringement.

Toolkit

Buy Now

to gain full access to the content and tools.

Want to Subscribe?

Learn more about subscription options

Advertisement
Related Articles
Topic Collections
PubMed Articles
Forgot your password?
Enter your username and email address. We'll send you a reminder to the email address on record.
(Required)
(Required)