0

The full content of Annals is available to subscribers

Subscribe/Learn More  >
Reviews |

Prostate Cancer: Screening, Diagnosis, and Management

Marc B. Garnick, MD
[+] Article and Author Information

From Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, and Genetics Institute, Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts. Requests for Reprints: Marc B. Garnick, MD, Genetics Institute, 87 Cambridge Park Dr., Cambridge, MA 02140.


Copyright 2004 by the American College of Physicians


Ann Intern Med. 1993;118(10):804-818. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-118-10-199305150-00008
Text Size: A A A

Objective: To provide physicians with a review of diagnosis, screening, staging evaluation, treatment options, prognosis, psychosocial issues, economic considerations, and future research directions in the management of patients with all stages of prostate cancer.

Data Sources: A MEDLINE search of articles relating to the diagnosis, staging, screening, surgery, radiation therapy, medical management, and research in prostate cancer. Emphasis on information reported from government- and nongovernment-sponsored large cooperative trials, consensus development conferences, and proceedings of prostate cancer organ site workshops.

Study Selection: Results of randomized treatment trials and consensus summary statements are reported where long-term results (> 5 years follow-up) are available for localized prostate cancer treatment and where survival outcomes are available for metastatic disease treatment.

Data Synthesis: Both qualitative and quantitative data are reported. Information on staging, management, and prognosis of localized prostate cancer is based on studies that are predominantly nonrandomized, include heterogeneous patient groups, and often use differing outcome measures. Information on management of metastatic prostate cancer is more quantitative and includes side effects of treatment and survival results obtained from randomized, prospective, multi-institutional studies.

Conclusions: Despite the increase in prostate cancer incidence and detection, substantial controversy still exists about the advisability and effectiveness of screening programs, the most appropriate staging evaluation, and the optimal management of patients with all stages of prostate cancer. Although randomized, prospective studies attempt to address some of these issues, physicians must appreciate inherent ambiguities involved in recommending staging and treatment choices.

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 1.
Long-term survival.

Comparison of long-term survival of patients with stage T2a (B1) disease treated by radiation therapy in the Stanford University Hospital series (134 patients, triangles) and those treated by radical prostatectomy in the series at The Johns Hopkins Hospital (57 patients, open circles) and Virginia Mason Medical Center (195 patients, closed circles) according to a personal communication (Shipley WU). (Reprinted with permission from Bagshaw MA, et al. NCI Monogr. 1988; 7:47-60.).

Grahic Jump Location
Grahic Jump Location
Figure 2.
Scheme of achieving castrate androgen levels.

Estrogens such as diethylstilbestrol inhibit the release of luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) from the hypothalamus, thus also diminishing the release of follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) and luteinizing hormone (LH) from the anterior pituitary gland. Analogs of LHRH initially stimulate but ultimately inhibit the release of FSH and LH from the anterior pituitary gland. Ketoconazole and aminogluthethimide inhibit steroid synthetic pathways. In the prostate cells, testosterone is converted into dihydrotestosterone (DHT) by the enzyme 5--reductase. Anti-androgens block the binding of DHT to its cytoplasmic receptor. (Garnick MB. Urologic Cancer. In: Rubenstein E, Federman DD; eds. Scientific American Medicine. New York, Scientific American. Section 12, IX:1-17, with permission.).

Grahic Jump Location

Tables

References

Letters

NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).

Comments

Submit a Comment
Submit a Comment

Summary for Patients

Clinical Slide Sets

Terms of Use

The In the Clinic® slide sets are owned and copyrighted by the American College of Physicians (ACP). All text, graphics, trademarks, and other intellectual property incorporated into the slide sets remain the sole and exclusive property of the ACP. The slide sets may be used only by the person who downloads or purchases them and only for the purpose of presenting them during not-for-profit educational activities. Users may incorporate the entire slide set or selected individual slides into their own teaching presentations but may not alter the content of the slides in any way or remove the ACP copyright notice. Users may make print copies for use as hand-outs for the audience the user is personally addressing but may not otherwise reproduce or distribute the slides by any means or media, including but not limited to sending them as e-mail attachments, posting them on Internet or Intranet sites, publishing them in meeting proceedings, or making them available for sale or distribution in any unauthorized form, without the express written permission of the ACP. Unauthorized use of the In the Clinic slide sets will constitute copyright infringement.

Toolkit

Buy Now

to gain full access to the content and tools.

Want to Subscribe?

Learn more about subscription options

Advertisement
Related Articles
Related Point of Care
Topic Collections
PubMed Articles

Buy Now

to gain full access to the content and tools.

Want to Subscribe?

Learn more about subscription options

Forgot your password?
Enter your username and email address. We'll send you a reminder to the email address on record.
(Required)
(Required)