0

The full content of Annals is available to subscribers

Subscribe/Learn More  >
Articles |

Physician Reporting Compared with Medical-Record Review to Identify Adverse Medical Events

Anne C. O'Neil, MPH; Laura A. Petersen, MD; E. Francis Cook, ScD; David W. Bates, MD; Thomas H. Lee, MD; and Troyen A. Brennan, MD
[+] Article and Author Information

From Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; the Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts. Requests for Reprints: Troyen A. Brennan, MD, Department of Health Policy and Management, Harvard School of Public Health, 677 Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA 02115. Acknowledgments: The authors thank Ann Marie Hultmark for her help throughout this project. Grant Support: By the Brigham and Women's Hospital and the Aso-Nesson Research Fund.


Copyright 2004 by the American College of Physicians


Ann Intern Med. 1993;119(5):370-376. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-119-5-199309010-00004
Text Size: A A A

Objective: To assess the effectiveness of housestaff physician reporting as a method for identifying adverse events on a medical service and to compare the physician reporting mechanism with a retrospective record review mechanism.

Setting: Medical service of an urban, university-affiliated teaching hospital.

Design: Concurrent physician reporting mechanism using the hospital electronic mail system compared with a retrospective record review using a screening mechanism followed by structured, implicit physician review of the record.

Patients: All 3146 admissions to the medical service from 13 November 1990 to 14 March 1991.

Results: The housestaff physician reporting method identified nearly the same number of adverse events (89) as did the record review (85). However, the two methods identified only 41 of the same patients ( = 0.52). No statistically significant clinical or socioeconomic differences occurred between the patients identified as having had an adverse event, using the two reporting methods (physician versus record review). The housestaff did report statistically more preventable adverse events (62.5% compared with 32%; P = 0.003). The physician reporting mechanism was also less costly (approximately $15 000 compared with $54 000).

Conclusion: An adverse event identification strategy based on physician self-referral uncovers as many adverse events as does a record review and is less costly. In addition, physician-identified events are more likely to be preventable and, thus, are targets for quality improvement.

Figures

Tables

References

Letters

NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).

Comments

Submit a Comment
Submit a Comment

Summary for Patients

Clinical Slide Sets

Terms of Use

The In the Clinic® slide sets are owned and copyrighted by the American College of Physicians (ACP). All text, graphics, trademarks, and other intellectual property incorporated into the slide sets remain the sole and exclusive property of the ACP. The slide sets may be used only by the person who downloads or purchases them and only for the purpose of presenting them during not-for-profit educational activities. Users may incorporate the entire slide set or selected individual slides into their own teaching presentations but may not alter the content of the slides in any way or remove the ACP copyright notice. Users may make print copies for use as hand-outs for the audience the user is personally addressing but may not otherwise reproduce or distribute the slides by any means or media, including but not limited to sending them as e-mail attachments, posting them on Internet or Intranet sites, publishing them in meeting proceedings, or making them available for sale or distribution in any unauthorized form, without the express written permission of the ACP. Unauthorized use of the In the Clinic slide sets will constitute copyright infringement.

Toolkit

Buy Now

to gain full access to the content and tools.

Want to Subscribe?

Learn more about subscription options

Advertisement
Related Articles
Related Point of Care
Topic Collections
PubMed Articles
Forgot your password?
Enter your username and email address. We'll send you a reminder to the email address on record.
(Required)
(Required)