0

The full content of Annals is available to subscribers

Subscribe/Learn More  >
Reviews |

Screening for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm in Men Ages 60 to 80 Years: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis

Paul S. Frame, MD; Dennis G. Fryback, PhD; and Christopher Patterson, MD
[+] Article and Author Information

From the Tri-County Family Medicine Program, Dansville, New York; the Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, New York; the University of Wisconsin-Madison Medical School, Madison, Wisconsin; McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada. Requests for Reprints: Paul S. Frame, MD, Tri-County Family Medicine, Box 112 Park Avenue, Cohocton, NY 14826. Grant Support: In part by the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research (HSO6283) and in part by the Geriatrics Research, Education, and Clinical Center at the Madison Department of Veterans Affairs.


Copyright 2004 by the American College of Physicians


Ann Intern Med. 1993;119(5):411-416. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-119-5-199309010-00010
Text Size: A A A

Purpose: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of screening by physical examination or abdominal ultrasonography for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) in men aged 60 to 80 years.

Data Sources: A systematic review of the pertinent literature by the Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination, augmented by an additional computerized search (MEDLINE) and references identified from bibliographies of pertinent articles. Several experts reviewed the data for completeness.

Study Selection: Published English-language studies that present data relevant to screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm.

Data Extraction: Several reviewers determined a range of data and the most probable value for each parameter.

Data Synthesis: A computer spreadsheet model was constructed to simulate the costs and effectiveness of various screening protocols in a cohort of 10 000 men during a period of 20 years. The primary cost-effectiveness measure computed was incremental present-value dollar expenditures for screening and treatment per incremental present-value life-year saved by the screening program. Using the most probable values for the simulation parameters, a single screening procedure of abdominal palpation followed by abdominal ultrasound scan for patients with positive screening results is estimated to gain 20 life-years at a cost of $28 741 per life-year. A single ultrasound screen gains 57 life-years at a cost of $41 550 per life-year. A repeated ultrasound screen after 5 years gains 1 additional life-year at a cost of $906 769.

Conclusions: A single screen for AAA by abdominal palpation in men from age 60 to 80 years might be considered cost-effective but of small benefit. A single screen with ultrasonography is at the high end of the cost-per-life-year range that might be considered cost-effective and also is of modest benefit. Repeated screening is not cost-effective.

Figures

Tables

References

Letters

NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).

Comments

Submit a Comment
Submit a Comment

Summary for Patients

Clinical Slide Sets

Terms of Use

The In the Clinic® slide sets are owned and copyrighted by the American College of Physicians (ACP). All text, graphics, trademarks, and other intellectual property incorporated into the slide sets remain the sole and exclusive property of the ACP. The slide sets may be used only by the person who downloads or purchases them and only for the purpose of presenting them during not-for-profit educational activities. Users may incorporate the entire slide set or selected individual slides into their own teaching presentations but may not alter the content of the slides in any way or remove the ACP copyright notice. Users may make print copies for use as hand-outs for the audience the user is personally addressing but may not otherwise reproduce or distribute the slides by any means or media, including but not limited to sending them as e-mail attachments, posting them on Internet or Intranet sites, publishing them in meeting proceedings, or making them available for sale or distribution in any unauthorized form, without the express written permission of the ACP. Unauthorized use of the In the Clinic slide sets will constitute copyright infringement.

Toolkit

Buy Now

to gain full access to the content and tools.

Want to Subscribe?

Learn more about subscription options

Advertisement
Related Articles
Related Point of Care
Topic Collections
PubMed Articles
Forgot your password?
Enter your username and email address. We'll send you a reminder to the email address on record.
(Required)
(Required)