0

The full content of Annals is available to subscribers

Subscribe/Learn More  >
Academia and the Profession |

The Attractiveness of Internal Medicine: A Qualitative Analysis of the Experiences of Female and Male Medical Students

Julia E. McMurray, MD; Mark D. Schwartz, MD; Nancy P. Genero, PhD; and Mark Linzer, MD
[+] Article and Author Information

From Wellesley College, Wellesley, Massachusetts; New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York; New England Medical Center and Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts. Society of General Internal Medicine Task Force on Career Choice in Internal Medicine. For a full listing of the participants and co-investigators in the Society of General Internal Medicine survey on career choice, see (Ref. 6). Requests for Reprints: Drs. Julia McMurray and Mark Linzer: Section of General Internal Medicine, University of Wisconsin Clinical Science Center, J5/210, 600 Highland Avenue, Madison, WI 53792. Disclaimer: The views expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the American College of Physicians or the American Board of Internal Medicine. Acknowledgments: The authors thank Nancy Dean for expert assistance with manuscript preparation; Drs. Howard Beckman, Linda Grant, and Richard Ryan for critical review of earlier versions of the manuscript; Lisa Borchetta and Catherine Feuer for data transcription and entry; Dr. Jean Baker Miller for help with model development; Dr. Adina Kalet for valuable input during early stages of this study. Grant Support: In part by grants from the American College of Physicians and the American Board of Internal Medicine.


Copyright 2004 by the American College of Physicians


Ann Intern Med. 1993;119(8):812-818. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-119-8-199310150-00007
Text Size: A A A

Objective: To understand better the decline in medical student interest in internal medicine.

Design: Qualitative analysis of 500 essays from respondents who participated in a national survey of graduating medical students from the class of 1990 in 16 medical schools. Medical students were asked the open-ended question, What suggestions do you have for improving the attractiveness of internal medicine? A model of career choice was developed for the analysis that included the following factors: ambulatory care exposure and primary care (including relationships with patients); attending physician-student interactions and learning climate; stress and workload; income and prestige; and intellectual stimulation.

Participants: The original survey included 1650 fourth-year medical students; 500 essay respondents were stratified by sex and then randomly chosen for the analysis.

Results: Students most frequently suggested that ambulatory care experiences be increased and that better relationships with patients be established during medical training (65% of women and 50% of men, P < 0.01). The second most frequent suggestion was to improve internal medicine attending physicians' interactions with students (51% and 48% of women and men, respectively). Students who had seriously considered a career in medicine but switched to other primary care careers (general pediatrics, family medicine) had few concerns about income and prestige, whereas those who chose internal medicine had reservations about expected workload and income. Women were more likely than men to reject internal medicine for other primary care fields (26% of women compared with 16% of men, P = 0.05).

Conclusions: Students, particularly female students, expressed a strong interest in establishing better relationships with patients. Lack of respect by medical attendings and negative teaching methods were important sources of dissatisfaction among both men and women. Attention to these relationship issues, in addition to housestaff stress and expected future income, may improve the attractiveness of internal medicine.

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 1.
Sample response to open-ended question that shows bracketing and numbered phrases before coding.
Grahic Jump Location

Tables

References

Letters

NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).

Comments

Submit a Comment
Submit a Comment

Summary for Patients

Clinical Slide Sets

Terms of Use

The In the Clinic® slide sets are owned and copyrighted by the American College of Physicians (ACP). All text, graphics, trademarks, and other intellectual property incorporated into the slide sets remain the sole and exclusive property of the ACP. The slide sets may be used only by the person who downloads or purchases them and only for the purpose of presenting them during not-for-profit educational activities. Users may incorporate the entire slide set or selected individual slides into their own teaching presentations but may not alter the content of the slides in any way or remove the ACP copyright notice. Users may make print copies for use as hand-outs for the audience the user is personally addressing but may not otherwise reproduce or distribute the slides by any means or media, including but not limited to sending them as e-mail attachments, posting them on Internet or Intranet sites, publishing them in meeting proceedings, or making them available for sale or distribution in any unauthorized form, without the express written permission of the ACP. Unauthorized use of the In the Clinic slide sets will constitute copyright infringement.

Toolkit

Buy Now

to gain full access to the content and tools.

Want to Subscribe?

Learn more about subscription options

Advertisement
Related Articles
Journal Club
Topic Collections
PubMed Articles
Forgot your password?
Enter your username and email address. We'll send you a reminder to the email address on record.
(Required)
(Required)