0

The full content of Annals is available to subscribers

Subscribe/Learn More  >
Articles |

Running and the Development of Disability with Age

James F. Fries, MD; Gurkirpal Singh, MD; Dianne Morfeld, BA; Helen B. Hubert, PhD; Nancy E. Lane, MD; and Byron W. Brown, PhD
[+] Article and Author Information

From Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California. Requests for Reprints: James F. Fries, MD, 1000 Welch Road, Suite 203, Palo Alto, CA 94304-1808. Grant Support: By grant AR20610-16 from the National Institutes of Health to the Stanford Arthritis Center.


Copyright ©2004 by the American College of Physicians


Ann Intern Med. 1994;121(7):502-509. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-121-7-199410010-00005
Text Size: A A A

Objective: To determine, by longitudinal study, whether regular vigorous running activity is associated with accelerated, unchanged, or postponed development of disability with increasing age.

Study Design: 8-year prospective, longitudinal study with yearly assessments.

Participants: 451 members of a runners' club and 330 community controls who were initially 50 to 72 years old (also characterized as “ever-runners” [n = 534] and “never-runners” [n = 247], respectively).

Measurements: The dependent variable was disability as assessed by the Health Assessment Questionnaire and separately validated in these participant cohorts. Covariates included age, sex, body mass index, comorbid conditions, education level, smoking history, alcohol intake, mean blood pressure, initial disability level, family history of arthritis, and radiologic evidence of osteoarthritis of the knee in a subsample.

Results: Initially, the runners were leaner, reported joint symptoms less frequently, took fewer medications, had fewer medical problems, and had fewer instances of and less severity of disability, suggesting either that the average previous 12 years of running had improved health or that self-selection bias was present. After 8 years of longitudinal study, the differences in initial disability levels (0.026 compared with 0.079; P < 0.001) had steadily increased to 0.071 for runners compared with 0.242 for controls (P < 0.001). The difference was consistent for men and women. The rate of development of disability was several times lower in the runners' club members than in community controls; this difference persisted after adjusting for age, sex, body mass, baseline disability, smoking history, history of arthritis, or other comorbid conditions (slopes of progression of disability for the years 1984 to 1992, after adjusting for covariates: men in the runners' club, 0.004 (SE, 0.002); community controls, 0.012 (SE, 0.002); women in the runners' club, 0.009 (SE, 0.005); community controls, 0.027 (SE, 0.004); P < 0.002 for both sets of comparisons). In addition to differences in disability, there were significant differences in mortality between the runners' club members (1.49%) and community controls (7.09%) (P < 0.001). These differences remained significant after adjusting for age, sex, body mass, comorbid conditions, education level, smoking history, alcohol intake, and mean blood pressure (P < 0.002, conditional risk ratio for community controls compared with the runners, 4.27; 95% CI, 1.78 to 10.26).

Conclusions: Older persons who engage in vigorous running and other aerobic activities have lower mortality and slower development of disability than do members of the general population. This association is probably related to increased aerobic activity, strength, fitness, and increased organ reserve rather than to an effect of postponed osteoarthritis development.

Topics

disability

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 1.
Progression of disability over time. Top.PBottom.

Runners' club members compared with community controls. Data from all patients and all data points were compared with data from continuing 1992 participants (completers). Bars represent 95% confidence limits. No significant differences existed between those completing 8 years of the study (1992 participants) and data including all data points, but significant differences between runners' club participants and community controls were observed at all time points ( < 0.01). Ever-runners compared with never-runners. Similar differences, significant at all time points, are seen when ever-runners, those who have ever run for 1 month or more, were compared with never-runners. Bars represent 95% confidence limits (1992 participants).

Grahic Jump Location
Grahic Jump Location
Figure 2.
Progression of disability over time by sex.P

Runners' club compared with community controls. Disability progression is less in the runners' club members. Significant differences were noted for men and women, with the effects more pronounced in women ( < 0.05). Bars represent 95% confidence limits (1992 participants).

Grahic Jump Location
Grahic Jump Location
Figure 3.
Disability levels by age.P

The figure presents a cross-sectional analysis of disability in runner's club, community control, and all participants in 1992. Differences between runner's club members and community controls are significant ( < 0.05) at all ages except for the youngest and the oldest. Bars represent 95% confidence limits.

Grahic Jump Location
Grahic Jump Location
Figure 4.
Survival analysis.Table 4

Kaplan-Meier survival curves are presented for runners' club members and for community controls. Bars represent 95% confidence limits. These curves present the crude mortality data; shows data adjusted for relevant covariates.

Grahic Jump Location

Tables

References

Letters

NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).

Comments

Submit a Comment
Submit a Comment

Summary for Patients

Clinical Slide Sets

Terms of Use

The In the Clinic® slide sets are owned and copyrighted by the American College of Physicians (ACP). All text, graphics, trademarks, and other intellectual property incorporated into the slide sets remain the sole and exclusive property of the ACP. The slide sets may be used only by the person who downloads or purchases them and only for the purpose of presenting them during not-for-profit educational activities. Users may incorporate the entire slide set or selected individual slides into their own teaching presentations but may not alter the content of the slides in any way or remove the ACP copyright notice. Users may make print copies for use as hand-outs for the audience the user is personally addressing but may not otherwise reproduce or distribute the slides by any means or media, including but not limited to sending them as e-mail attachments, posting them on Internet or Intranet sites, publishing them in meeting proceedings, or making them available for sale or distribution in any unauthorized form, without the express written permission of the ACP. Unauthorized use of the In the Clinic slide sets will constitute copyright infringement.

Toolkit

Buy Now

to gain full access to the content and tools.

Want to Subscribe?

Learn more about subscription options

Advertisement
Related Articles
Related Point of Care
Topic Collections
PubMed Articles
Forgot your password?
Enter your username and email address. We'll send you a reminder to the email address on record.
(Required)
(Required)