0

The full content of Annals is available to subscribers

Subscribe/Learn More  >
Medicine and Public Policy |

Practice Guidelines and Malpractice Litigation: A Two-Way Street

Andrew L. Hyams, JD, MPH; Jennifer A. Brandenburg, BA; Stuart R. Lipsitz, ScD; David W. Shapiro, MD, JD; and Troyen A. Brennan, MD, JD, MPH
[+] Article and Author Information

From the Harvard School of Public Health and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; and San Francisco General Hospital, San Francisco, California. Requests for Reprints: Troyen A. Brennan, MD, JD, MPH, Department of Health Policy and Management, Harvard School of Public Health, 677 Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA 02115. Grant Support: In part by the Physician Payment Review Commission, Grant 92-G04. During the period of the grant, Dr. Shapiro was senior analyst at the PPRC.


Copyright ©2004 by the American College of Physicians


Ann Intern Med. 1995;122(6):450-455. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-122-6-199503150-00008
Text Size: A A A

Objective: To understand how practice guidelines are used in malpractice litigation.

Design: Review of the open and closed malpractice claims of two medical malpractice insurance companies, and a mailed survey of attorneys who litigate malpractice claims.

Setting: United States.

Participants: Two insurance companies and 960 randomly selected malpractice attorneys.

Measurements: Frequency and nature of the use of practice guidelines in litigation; understanding and frequency of the use of practice guidelines by attorneys in malpractice cases.

Results: 259 claims opened in 1990-1992 at two insurance companies, including all obstetrics and anesthesia claims and a random sample of other claims, were reviewed. Seventeen of these claims involved practice guidelines, which were used as exculpatory evidence (exonerating the defendant physician) in 4 cases and as inculpatory evidence (implicating the defendant physician) in 12 cases. The only physician or patient factors associated with use of a guideline was a longer physician–patient relationship (P = 0.021). Nine hundred and sixty surveys were mailed and 578 were returned (response rate, 60.1%). Attorneys reported that once a suit is initiated, practice guidelines are likely to be used for inculpatory purposes (inculpatory in 54% of cases; exculpatory in 22.7% of cases). However, guidelines that seem to offer exculpatory value induce attorneys not to bring suits. The only attorney factor associated with increased use of guidelines was a practice in which more than 50% of business was in medical malpractice.

Conclusions: Guidelines are used both by plaintiffs' and defendants' attorneys in malpractice cases. The emphasis in health reform proposals on guidelines as exculpatory evidence should be carefully considered.

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 1.
Litigation file review: practice guideline utilization.

The litigation file review started with 259 claims and identified 17 that involved the use of guidelines. The disposition of these claims is noted.

Grahic Jump Location
Grahic Jump Location
Figure 2.
Attorney survey resulted in a response rate of 60.

2%.

Grahic Jump Location

Tables

References

Letters

NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).

Comments

Submit a Comment
Submit a Comment

Summary for Patients

Clinical Slide Sets

Terms of Use

The In the Clinic® slide sets are owned and copyrighted by the American College of Physicians (ACP). All text, graphics, trademarks, and other intellectual property incorporated into the slide sets remain the sole and exclusive property of the ACP. The slide sets may be used only by the person who downloads or purchases them and only for the purpose of presenting them during not-for-profit educational activities. Users may incorporate the entire slide set or selected individual slides into their own teaching presentations but may not alter the content of the slides in any way or remove the ACP copyright notice. Users may make print copies for use as hand-outs for the audience the user is personally addressing but may not otherwise reproduce or distribute the slides by any means or media, including but not limited to sending them as e-mail attachments, posting them on Internet or Intranet sites, publishing them in meeting proceedings, or making them available for sale or distribution in any unauthorized form, without the express written permission of the ACP. Unauthorized use of the In the Clinic slide sets will constitute copyright infringement.

Toolkit

Buy Now

to gain full access to the content and tools.

Want to Subscribe?

Learn more about subscription options

Advertisement
Related Articles
Topic Collections
Forgot your password?
Enter your username and email address. We'll send you a reminder to the email address on record.
(Required)
(Required)