0

The full content of Annals is available to subscribers

Subscribe/Learn More  >
Reviews |

Esophageal Ulceration in Human Immunodeficiency Virus Infection: Causes, Response to Therapy, and Long-Term Outcome

C. Mel Wilcox; David A. Schwartz; and W. Scott Clark
[+] Article and Author Information

From Emory University School of Medicine, Emory University School of Public Health, and Grady Memorial Hospital, Atlanta, Georgia. Requests for Reprints: C. Mel Wilcox, MD, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Alabama Birmingham Station, Birmingham, AL 35294-0007. Acknowledgments: The authors thank Robert Horsburgh, MD, for constructive criticism.


Copyright ©2004 by the American College of Physicians


Ann Intern Med. 1995;123(2):143-149. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-123-2-199507150-00010
Text Size: A A A

Objective: To determine the causes of esophageal ulceration, the response rate to currently available therapies, and the long-term outcome in patients with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection.

Design: Prospective cohort study.

Setting: An urban county hospital.

Patients: Consecutive patients with HIV infection and endoscopically detected esophageal ulceration during a 4-year period.

Intervention: Causes of ulcers were determined from clinical, endoscopic, and pathologic findings. Standard medical therapies for the identified causes were instituted, and ulcer healing was endoscopically confirmed when possible.

Measurements: Symptomatic and endoscopic response to therapy and long-term outcome, including survival.

Results: 100 patients with esophageal ulcer were identified. Ulcers caused by cytomegalovirus alone were the most common (n = 45); idiopathic ulcers were almost as frequent (n = 40). Herpes simplex virus esophagitis alone was identified as a cause in only 5 patients. Several potential causes of ulcer were found in 5 patients, including Candida esophagitis in 27 patients. Ten patients developed more than one cause of ulceration during long-term follow-up. Eighty-five patients had specific medical therapy for their identified disorders and had an overall response rate of 98%. Median survival from time of diagnosis was 8.9 months (range, 2 days to > 42 months). A difference in median survival was found between patients with cytomegalovirus esophagitis and those with idiopathic esophageal ulcer (7.6 months compared with 13.1 months; P = 0.03).

Conclusions: Given 1) the broad spectrum of causes of esophageal ulceration, 2) that each of these causes requires specific therapy, and 3) the apparent high response rate, it is important to do endoscopic evaluation with mucosal biopsy in patients with HIV infection so that a diagnosis can be established and appropriate therapy instituted. Despite effective therapy, long-term survival is poor; however, long-term remission and survival may occur in some patients.

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 1.
Causes of esophageal ulcer in 100 patients.

CMV = cytomegalovirus; GERD = gastroesophageal reflux disease; HSV = herpes simplex virus; IEU = idiopathic esophageal ulcer.

Grahic Jump Location
Grahic Jump Location
Figure 2.
Kaplan-Meier survival curve for patients with cytomegalovirus (CMV) esophagitis and patients with idiopathic esophageal ulcer (IEU).P

A significant difference in median survival was found ( = 0.03; 7.6 months for patients with cytomegalovirus esophagitis compared with 13.1 months for patients with idiopathic esophageal ulcer). Survival was also related to mCD4 lymphocyte count.

Grahic Jump Location

Tables

References

Letters

NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).

Comments

Submit a Comment
Submit a Comment

Summary for Patients

Clinical Slide Sets

Terms of Use

The In the Clinic® slide sets are owned and copyrighted by the American College of Physicians (ACP). All text, graphics, trademarks, and other intellectual property incorporated into the slide sets remain the sole and exclusive property of the ACP. The slide sets may be used only by the person who downloads or purchases them and only for the purpose of presenting them during not-for-profit educational activities. Users may incorporate the entire slide set or selected individual slides into their own teaching presentations but may not alter the content of the slides in any way or remove the ACP copyright notice. Users may make print copies for use as hand-outs for the audience the user is personally addressing but may not otherwise reproduce or distribute the slides by any means or media, including but not limited to sending them as e-mail attachments, posting them on Internet or Intranet sites, publishing them in meeting proceedings, or making them available for sale or distribution in any unauthorized form, without the express written permission of the ACP. Unauthorized use of the In the Clinic slide sets will constitute copyright infringement.

Toolkit

Buy Now

to gain full access to the content and tools.

Want to Subscribe?

Learn more about subscription options

Advertisement
Related Articles
Journal Club
Related Point of Care
Topic Collections
PubMed Articles

Buy Now

to gain full access to the content and tools.

Want to Subscribe?

Learn more about subscription options

Forgot your password?
Enter your username and email address. We'll send you a reminder to the email address on record.
(Required)
(Required)