0

The full content of Annals is available to subscribers

Subscribe/Learn More  >
Articles |

Alternative Management Strategies for Patients with Suspected Peptic Ulcer Disease

A. Mark Fendrick; Michael E. Chernew; Richard A. Hirth; and Bernard S. Bloom
[+] Article and Author Information

From the University of Michigan School of Medicine and School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, Michigan, and the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Requests for Reprints: A. Mark Fendrick, MD, Division of General Medicine, University of Michigan Medical Center, 3116 Taubman Center, Ann Arbor, MI 48109.


Copyright ©2004 by the American College of Physicians


Ann Intern Med. 1995;123(4):260-268. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-123-4-199508150-00003
Text Size: A A A

Objective: To estimate the clinical and economic effects of available invasive and noninvasive management strategies for peptic ulcer and Helicobacter pylori in persons with symptoms suggesting peptic ulcer disease.

Design: Cost-effectiveness analysis using a decision analytic model.

Intervention: 2 immediate endoscopy and 3 noninvasive diagnostic and treatment strategies were evaluated: 1) immediate endoscopy for peptic ulcer and biopsy for H. pylori; 2) immediate endoscopy without biopsy; 3) serologic test for H. pylori; 4) empiric treatment with antisecretory therapy; and 5) empiric treatment with antisecretory therapy and antibiotic agents to eradicate H. pylori.

Measurements: Cost per ulcer cured and cost per patient treated.

Results: The estimated costs per ulcer cured by strategy were as follows: 1) endoscopy and biopsy for H. pylori, $8045; 2) endoscopy without biopsy, $6984; 3) serologic test for H. pylori, $4541; 4) empiric antisecretory therapy, $4835; and 5) empiric antisecretory and antibiotic therapy, $4155. The predicted costs per patient treated were as follows: 1) endoscopy and biopsy for H. pylori, $1584; 2) endoscopy without biopsy, $1375; 3) serologic test for H. pylori, $894; 4) empiric antisecretory therapy, $952; and 5) empiric antisecretory and antibiotic therapy, $818. The cost-effectiveness advantage of the noninvasive strategies diminished as the cost of endoscopy decreased or as the probability of recurrent symptoms increased in patients initially managed without endoscopy.

Conclusion: Endoscopy, although costly, precisely guided diagnosis and treatment and thus potentially reduced the number of patients inappropriately treated. However, the safety and effectiveness of less expensive, less invasive diagnostic and treatment strategies strongly support initial noninvasive care of symptomatic persons thought to have peptic ulcer disease.

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 1.

Cost per ulcer cured and cost per patient treated by management strategy.

Grahic Jump Location
Grahic Jump Location
Figure 2.

Sensitivity analysis: cost of endoscopy.

Grahic Jump Location
Grahic Jump Location
Figure 3.
Two variable sensitivity analyses: cost of endoscopy and probability of recurrent symptoms in patients without ulcer disease.

Area above the solid line favors empiric therapy; area below the line favors immediate endoscopy.

Grahic Jump Location

Tables

References

Letters

NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).

Comments

Submit a Comment
Submit a Comment

Summary for Patients

Clinical Slide Sets

Terms of Use

The In the Clinic® slide sets are owned and copyrighted by the American College of Physicians (ACP). All text, graphics, trademarks, and other intellectual property incorporated into the slide sets remain the sole and exclusive property of the ACP. The slide sets may be used only by the person who downloads or purchases them and only for the purpose of presenting them during not-for-profit educational activities. Users may incorporate the entire slide set or selected individual slides into their own teaching presentations but may not alter the content of the slides in any way or remove the ACP copyright notice. Users may make print copies for use as hand-outs for the audience the user is personally addressing but may not otherwise reproduce or distribute the slides by any means or media, including but not limited to sending them as e-mail attachments, posting them on Internet or Intranet sites, publishing them in meeting proceedings, or making them available for sale or distribution in any unauthorized form, without the express written permission of the ACP. Unauthorized use of the In the Clinic slide sets will constitute copyright infringement.

Toolkit

Buy Now

to gain full access to the content and tools.

Want to Subscribe?

Learn more about subscription options

Advertisement
Related Articles
Related Point of Care
Topic Collections
PubMed Articles
Forgot your password?
Enter your username and email address. We'll send you a reminder to the email address on record.
(Required)
(Required)