0

The full content of Annals is available to subscribers

Subscribe/Learn More  >
Reviews |

Endoscopic Ligation Compared with Sclerotherapy for Treatment of Esophageal Variceal Bleeding: A Meta-Analysis

Loren Laine; and Deborah Cook
[+] Article and Author Information

From the University of Southern California School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California. McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada. Requests for Reprints: Loren Laine, MD, Gastroenterology Division (LAC 12-137), Department of Medicine, University of Southern California School of Medicine, 2025 Zonal Avenue, Los Angeles, CA 90033. Acknowledgments: The authors thank the authors of the primary studies for their collaboration. Grant Support: Dr. Cook is a Career Scientist of the Ontario Ministry of Health.


Copyright ©2004 by the American College of Physicians


Ann Intern Med. 1995;123(4):280-287. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-123-4-199508150-00007
Text Size: A A A

Purpose: To compare the effect of endoscopic ligation with that of sclerotherapy in the treatment of patients with bleeding esophageal varices.

Data Sources: Strategies to identify published and unpublished research included searches of computerized bibliographic and scientific citations, review of citations in relevant primary articles, searches of services providing information on unpublished studies, contact with primary investigators and the ligation equipment manufacturer, and review of proceedings from pertinent scientific meetings.

Study Selection: From 158 potentially relevant articles, duplicate independent review identified 7 relevant randomized trials that compared endoscopic ligation with sclerotherapy for the treatment of patients with bleeding esophageal varices.

Data Abstraction: Independent, duplicate data abstraction of the population, intervention, outcome, and methodologic quality of the trials was done.

Data Synthesis: Ligation therapy compared with sclerotherapy reduced the rebleeding rate (odds ratio, 0.52 [95% CI, 0.37 to 0.74]), the mortality rate (odds ratio, 0.67 [CI, 0.46 to 0.98]), and the rate of death due to bleeding (odds ratio, 0.49 [CI, 0.24 to 0.996]). Four patients would need to be treated with ligation instead of sclerotherapy to avert one rebleeding episode, and 10 would need to be treated with ligation instead of sclerotherapy to prevent one death. Esophageal strictures occurred less frequently with ligation (odds ratio, 0.10 [CI, 0.03 to 0.29]), but no significant differences were seen between treatments for pulmonary infections or bacterial peritonitis. Additionally, the number of endoscopic treatment sessions required to achieve variceal obliteration was lower with ligation than with sclerotherapy.

Conclusions: On the basis of lower rates of rebleeding, mortality, and complications and the need for fewer endoscopic treatments, ligation should be considered the endoscopic treatment of choice for patients with esophageal variceal bleeding.

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 1.

Rebleeding in trials comparing ligation with sclerotherapy in the treatment of esophageal variceal bleeding.

Grahic Jump Location
Grahic Jump Location
Figure 2.

Mortality in trials comparing ligation with sclerotherapy in the treatment of esophageal variceal bleeding.

Grahic Jump Location

Tables

References

Letters

NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).

Comments

Submit a Comment
Submit a Comment

Summary for Patients

Clinical Slide Sets

Terms of Use

The In the Clinic® slide sets are owned and copyrighted by the American College of Physicians (ACP). All text, graphics, trademarks, and other intellectual property incorporated into the slide sets remain the sole and exclusive property of the ACP. The slide sets may be used only by the person who downloads or purchases them and only for the purpose of presenting them during not-for-profit educational activities. Users may incorporate the entire slide set or selected individual slides into their own teaching presentations but may not alter the content of the slides in any way or remove the ACP copyright notice. Users may make print copies for use as hand-outs for the audience the user is personally addressing but may not otherwise reproduce or distribute the slides by any means or media, including but not limited to sending them as e-mail attachments, posting them on Internet or Intranet sites, publishing them in meeting proceedings, or making them available for sale or distribution in any unauthorized form, without the express written permission of the ACP. Unauthorized use of the In the Clinic slide sets will constitute copyright infringement.

Toolkit

Buy Now

to gain full access to the content and tools.

Want to Subscribe?

Learn more about subscription options

Advertisement
Related Articles
Topic Collections
PubMed Articles

Buy Now

to gain full access to the content and tools.

Want to Subscribe?

Learn more about subscription options

Forgot your password?
Enter your username and email address. We'll send you a reminder to the email address on record.
(Required)
(Required)