0

The full content of Annals is available to subscribers

Subscribe/Learn More  >
Current NIDDM Practices |

Medical Care for Patients with Diabetes: Epidemiologic Aspects

Maureen I. Harris, PhD MPH
[+] Article and Author Information

From the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland. For the current author address, see end of text. Note: This article is one of a series of articles comprising an Annals of Internal Medicine supplement entitled “Risks and Benefits of Intensive Management in Non-Insulin-dependent Diabetes Mellitus: The Fifth Regenstrief Conference.” To view a complete list of the articles included in this supplement, please view its Table of Contents. Requests for Reprints: Maureen I. Harris, PhD, MPH, NIDDK/NIH, Natcher Building, Room 5AN24, 45 Center Drive, MSC 6600, Bethesda, MD 20892-6600.


Copyright ©2004 by the American College of Physicians


Ann Intern Med. 1996;124(1_Part_2):117-122. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-124-1_Part_2-199601011-00007
Text Size: A A A

Objective: To describe the epidemiologic characteristics of physician care and self-care for adults with diabetes in the U.S. population.

Design and Subjects: Data are drawn from the 1989 National Health Interview Survey, in which a personal household interview was administered to a representative sample of U.S. adults aged 18 years or older. The response rate was 96% (n = 84 572). All subjects identified as having diabetes previously diagnosed by a physician were asked a series of questions about their diabetes. Response rate for this representative sample of U.S. diabetic patients was 95% (n = 2405).

Measurements: Self-reported information was obtained about various aspects of diabetes care, including care by physicians and self-care practices of the diabetic persons. Sociodemographic and clinical factors that may influence diabetes care were also determined.

Results: More than 90% of diabetic adults had one physician for the usual care of their diabetes, but 32% made fewer than four visits to this physician each year. Most physician visits by diabetic patients were not made to diabetes specialists, and the visit rate to other health care professionals such as ophthalmologists, podiatrists, and nutritionists was low. About half of insulin-treated diabetic subjects used multiple daily insulin injections; and 40% of patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus, 26% of those with non–insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) who were taking insulin, and 5% of those with NIDDM who were not taking insulin monitored their blood glucose level daily. Diabetes patient education classes had been attended by 35% of diabetic adults.

Conclusions: These and other data indicate that medical care for diabetic patients and their self-care practices may not be optimal for prevention of diabetes complications. The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial showed that achieving and maintaining near-normal glycemia, with a concomitant 50% to 70% reduction in diabetes complications, may require close monitoring and ongoing support from a health care team, ample financial resources, and advanced patient knowledge and motivation. Providing this level of diabetes management to all diabetic persons may require major changes in the health care system and in patient self-care practices.

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 1.
Frequency of visits to a regular physician by adults with insulin-dependent (IDDM) and non–insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) for diabetes care.

Sample sizes: patients with IDDM equals 124; patients with insulin-treated NIDDM equals 922; patients with NIDDM not treated with insulin equals 1346.

Grahic Jump Location
Grahic Jump Location
Figure 2.
Proportion of adults with non–insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) and without diabetes who were hospitalized in the past year (excluding hospitalizations for childbirth).

Sample sizes: patients with insulin-treated NIDDM equals 922; patients with NIDDM not treated by insulin equals 1346; nondiabetic patients equals 20 181.

Grahic Jump Location
Grahic Jump Location
Figure 3.
Percentage of adults with non–insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) who are treated with insulin and oral agents and who are following a diet for their diabetes, by years since diagnosis of diabetes.

Sample size: 2268 subjects with NIDDM.

Grahic Jump Location
Grahic Jump Location
Figure 4.
Percentage of adults with diabetes who self-monitor their blood glucose level at least once per day.

Sample sizes: patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM) equals 124; patients with insulin-treated non–insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) equals 922; patients with NIDDM not treated with insulin equals 1346. (Adapted from reference 12.).

Grahic Jump Location
Grahic Jump Location
Figure 5.
The mean fasting plasma glucose level in subjects without diabetes and in representative patient populations in U.

S. community-based studies. DM equals diabetes; Japn Amer equals Japanese American; Hisp equals Hispanic; Native Amer equals Native American. Adapted from reference 29.

Grahic Jump Location

Tables

References

Letters

NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).

Comments

Submit a Comment
Submit a Comment

Summary for Patients

Clinical Slide Sets

Terms of Use

The In the Clinic® slide sets are owned and copyrighted by the American College of Physicians (ACP). All text, graphics, trademarks, and other intellectual property incorporated into the slide sets remain the sole and exclusive property of the ACP. The slide sets may be used only by the person who downloads or purchases them and only for the purpose of presenting them during not-for-profit educational activities. Users may incorporate the entire slide set or selected individual slides into their own teaching presentations but may not alter the content of the slides in any way or remove the ACP copyright notice. Users may make print copies for use as hand-outs for the audience the user is personally addressing but may not otherwise reproduce or distribute the slides by any means or media, including but not limited to sending them as e-mail attachments, posting them on Internet or Intranet sites, publishing them in meeting proceedings, or making them available for sale or distribution in any unauthorized form, without the express written permission of the ACP. Unauthorized use of the In the Clinic slide sets will constitute copyright infringement.

Toolkit

Buy Now

to gain full access to the content and tools.

Want to Subscribe?

Learn more about subscription options

Advertisement
Related Articles
Related Point of Care
Topic Collections
PubMed Articles

Buy Now

to gain full access to the content and tools.

Want to Subscribe?

Learn more about subscription options

Forgot your password?
Enter your username and email address. We'll send you a reminder to the email address on record.
(Required)
(Required)