0

The full content of Annals is available to subscribers

Subscribe/Learn More  >
Articles |

Withdrawing Life Support from Mechanically Ventilated Recipients of Bone Marrow Transplants: A Case for Evidence-Based Guidelines

Gordon D. Rubenfeld, MD; and Stephen W. Crawford, MD
[+] Article and Author Information

From the University of Washington and the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington. Acknowledgments: The authors thank Kathleen Shannon-Dorcy, Jonda Barton, and Susan Treiber for their help in acquiring and abstracting charts and Gary Schoch for computer assistance. Grant Support: By the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (Dr. Rubenfeld); Public Health Service grants CA-18221, CA-18029, and CA-15704 from the National Cancer Institute; and Division of Health and Human Services grants HL-36444 and HL-30542 from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. Requests for Reprints: Gordon D. Rubenfeld, MD, Harborview Medical Center, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, 325 9th Avenue, Box 359762, Seattle, WA 98104-2499. Current Author Addresses: Dr. Rubenfeld: Harborview Medical Center, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, 325 9th Avenue, Box 359762, Seattle, WA 98104-2499.


Copyright ©2004 by the American College of Physicians


Ann Intern Med. 1996;125(8):625-633. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-125-8-199610150-00001
Text Size: A A A

Background: Mechanical ventilation after bone marrow transplantation is associated with a high mortality rate. The available literature provides conflicting predictors of outcome in relatively small study groups.

Objective: To identify predictors of death and mortality trends in mechanically ventilated transplant recipients.

Design: Nested case–control study.

Setting: The Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center in Seattle, Washington, which specializes in bone marrow transplantation.

Patients: All survivors (cases, n = 53) and a group of patients matched for year of transplantation who did not survive (controls, n = 106) were selected from all mechanically ventilated patients (n = 865) who received a bone marrow transplant between January 1980 and July 1992. Patients who received mechanical ventilation for less than 24 hours after a procedure or who received mechanical ventilation after a second bone marrow transplantation were excluded.

Measurements: Surviving patients were defined as those who were alive 30 days after extubation and who were discharged from the hospital. Daily laboratory, physiologic, and treatment variables were collected.

Results: Survival was statistically associated with younger age, lower score on the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation III, and a shorter time from transplantation to intubation. There were no survivors among an estimated 398 patients who had lung injury and either required more than 4 hours of vasopressor support or had sustained hepatic and renal failure. Through the use of these factors, an accurate prediction of death could have been made in the first 4 days of mechanical ventilation for more than half of the patients who did not survive. During the past 5 years, survival rate has changed from 5% to 16% (P = 0.008), an increase that was not explained by changes in the age of the patients, the rate or timing of intubation, or the percentage of allogeneic transplants that were not HLA-identical.

Conclusion: Of the patients who required mechanical ventilation after bone marrow transplantation, no one survived with lung injury combined with either hemodynamic instability or hepatic and renal failure. However, survival after mechanical ventilation seems to be improving.

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 1. = 0.01 for trend in percentage of patients surviving for 30 days after extubation and discharge from the hospital.
Trends in survival of mechanically ventilated recipients of bone marrow transplants. P
Grahic Jump Location

Tables

References

Letters

NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).

Comments

Submit a Comment
Submit a Comment

Summary for Patients

Clinical Slide Sets

Terms of Use

The In the Clinic® slide sets are owned and copyrighted by the American College of Physicians (ACP). All text, graphics, trademarks, and other intellectual property incorporated into the slide sets remain the sole and exclusive property of the ACP. The slide sets may be used only by the person who downloads or purchases them and only for the purpose of presenting them during not-for-profit educational activities. Users may incorporate the entire slide set or selected individual slides into their own teaching presentations but may not alter the content of the slides in any way or remove the ACP copyright notice. Users may make print copies for use as hand-outs for the audience the user is personally addressing but may not otherwise reproduce or distribute the slides by any means or media, including but not limited to sending them as e-mail attachments, posting them on Internet or Intranet sites, publishing them in meeting proceedings, or making them available for sale or distribution in any unauthorized form, without the express written permission of the ACP. Unauthorized use of the In the Clinic slide sets will constitute copyright infringement.

Toolkit

Buy Now

to gain full access to the content and tools.

Want to Subscribe?

Learn more about subscription options

Advertisement
Related Articles
Related Point of Care
Topic Collections
PubMed Articles
Forgot your password?
Enter your username and email address. We'll send you a reminder to the email address on record.
(Required)
(Required)