0

The full content of Annals is available to subscribers

Subscribe/Learn More  >
Reviews |

Can Clinical Interventions Change Care at the End of Life?

Laura C. Hanson, MD, MPH; James A. Tulsky, MD; and Marion Danis, MD
[+] Article and Author Information

From the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina; and Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina. Grant Support: By a Robert Wood Johnson Generalist Faculty Scholar award (Dr. Hanson) and a Project on Death in America Soros Faculty Scholar award (Dr. Tulsky), with additional funding from National Institute of Aging grant 5-P60-AG11268. Requests for Reprints: Laura C. Hanson, MD, Division of General Internal Medicine, CB 7110, 5035 Old Clinic Building, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7110. Current Author Addresses: Drs. Hanson and Danis: Division of General Internal Medicine, CB 7110, 5035 Old Clinic Building, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7110.


Copyright ©2004 by the American College of Physicians


Ann Intern Med. 1997;126(5):381-388. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-126-5-199703010-00007
Text Size: A A A

Purpose: To review clinical interventions designed to change care at the end of life.

Data Sources: Published results of clinical trials identified by MEDLINE searches, review of abstracts from meetings, and selected bibliographies.

Study Selection: Studies were included if data were presented on a clinical intervention designed to change medical care at the end of life. Studies done in nonclinical settings or outside the United States were excluded.

Data Extraction: Interventions were classified as targeting patients, physicians, or both and were analyzed by their effect on four common clinical goals: increasing use of patient preferences, decreasing pain and suffering, reducing use of life-sustaining treatments, and reducing costs. Positive and negative trial results were compared for differences in intervention, target group, and strength of study methods.

Data Synthesis: Educational interventions usually increased expression of patient treatment preferences. Success rates were higher when more severely ill patients were targeted and when written materials were combined with repeated discussions in clinical encounters. Educational interventions with physicians led to increased use of patient preferences, but sophisticated educational techniques were needed to motivate physicians to change their behavior. Three studies provided limited evidence that physician education reduced the use of life-sustaining treatments. No clinical intervention had an effect on pain, suffering, or cost of medical care.

Conclusion: To change care at the end of life, intensive educational interventions for physicians and broad institutional programs seem more promising than advance directives. Future innovations should seek to change physician practices, reduce costs, and improve patient-centered outcomes, such as pain control and satisfaction.

Figures

Tables

References

Letters

NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).

Comments

Submit a Comment
Submit a Comment

Summary for Patients

Clinical Slide Sets

Terms of Use

The In the Clinic® slide sets are owned and copyrighted by the American College of Physicians (ACP). All text, graphics, trademarks, and other intellectual property incorporated into the slide sets remain the sole and exclusive property of the ACP. The slide sets may be used only by the person who downloads or purchases them and only for the purpose of presenting them during not-for-profit educational activities. Users may incorporate the entire slide set or selected individual slides into their own teaching presentations but may not alter the content of the slides in any way or remove the ACP copyright notice. Users may make print copies for use as hand-outs for the audience the user is personally addressing but may not otherwise reproduce or distribute the slides by any means or media, including but not limited to sending them as e-mail attachments, posting them on Internet or Intranet sites, publishing them in meeting proceedings, or making them available for sale or distribution in any unauthorized form, without the express written permission of the ACP. Unauthorized use of the In the Clinic slide sets will constitute copyright infringement.

Toolkit

Buy Now

to gain full access to the content and tools.

Want to Subscribe?

Learn more about subscription options

Advertisement
Related Articles
Topic Collections
PubMed Articles
The Utility of Outcome Studies in Plastic Surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2014;2(7):e189.
Forgot your password?
Enter your username and email address. We'll send you a reminder to the email address on record.
(Required)
(Required)