0

The full content of Annals is available to subscribers

Subscribe/Learn More  >
Articles |

Peripheral Blood Stem Cell and Bone Marrow Transplantation for Solid Tumors and Lymphomas: Hematologic Recovery and Costs: A Randomized, Controlled Trial

Olivier Hartmann, MD; Anne Gaelle Le Corroller, PhD; Didier Blaise, MD; Jean Michon, MD; Irene Philip, MD; Francoise Norol, MD; Maud Janvier, MD; Jose Louis Pico, MD; Marie Christine Baranzelli, MD; Herve Rubie, MD; Carole Coze, MD; Antonella Pinna; Valerie Meresse, MD; and Ellen Benhamou, MD
[+] Article and Author Information

For author affiliations and current author addresses, see end of text. Acknowledgments: The authors thank the Federation Nationale des Centres de Lutte Contre le Cancer for promoting this study and Lorna Saint Ange for linguistic revision of the manuscript. Grant Support: In part by the Laboratoire AMGEN France. Requests for Reprints: Olivier Hartmann, MD, Institut Gustave-Roussy, Rue Camille Desmoulins, 94 800 Villejuif, France. Current Author Addresses: Dr. Hartmann: Institut Gustave-Roussy, Rue Camille Desmoulins, 94 800 Villejuif, France.


Copyright ©2004 by the American College of Physicians


Ann Intern Med. 1997;126(8):600-607. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-126-8-199704150-00002
Text Size: A A A

Background: Previous studies have suggested that peripheral blood stem cell (PBC) transplantation has an advantage over autologous bone marrow transplantation.

Objective: To compare the hematologic recovery and costs associated with PBC transplantation with those associated with autologous bone marrow transplantation in patients receiving high-dose chemotherapy for solid tumors or lymphomas.

Design: Multicenter, randomized, controlled clinical trial.

Setting: French Federation of Cancer Centers, located in cancer facilities or public hospitals with transplantation units.

Patients: Children and adults with solid tumors or lymphomas who were candidates for high-dose chemotherapy.

Interventions: Bone marrow or filgrastim-mobilized PBCs.

Measurement: The major end point was the duration of thrombocytopenia (platelet count < 50 × 109/L). An economic evaluation of both types of transplantation was done prospectively to measure costs and cost-effectiveness.

Results: 129 patients entered the trial; 64 had PBC transplantation, and 65 had bone marrow transplantation. The median duration of thrombocytopenia was 16 days in the PBC group and 36 days in the bone marrow group (P < 0.001). All of the other clinical end points studied (time to last platelet transfusion, duration of granulocytopenia, number of transfusion episodes, and duration of hospitalization) favored PBC transplantation. A cost analysis showed that total cost was decreased by 17% in adults and 29% in children with PBC transplantation; thus, PBC transplantation was clearly more cost-effective than bone marrow transplantation for both platelet and granulocyte recovery.

Conclusion: Transplantation of PBCs is associated with more rapid hematologic recovery than is bone marrow transplantation after high-dose chemotherapy for solid tumors or lymphomas. Furthermore, global costs are lower and cost-effectiveness ratios are better with PBC transplantation.

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 1.
Actuarial rates. Top.9PBottom.9P

Actuarial rate of patients having recovered a granulocyte count of more than 0.5 × 10 /L in the group receiving peripheral blood stem cell (PBC) transplantation and the group receiving bone marrow (BM) transplantation (log-rank test, < 0.001). Actuarial rate of patients having recovered a platelet count of more than 50 × 10 /L in the PBC group and the bone marrow group (log-rank test, < 0.001).

Grahic Jump Location
Grahic Jump Location
Figure 2.
Event-free survival rate in the groups having peripheral blood stem cell (PBC) transplantation and bone marrow (BM) transplantation (log-rank test, P > 0.

2). Median follow-up was 20 months (range, 11 to 31 months).

Grahic Jump Location

Tables

References

Letters

NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).

Comments

Submit a Comment
Submit a Comment

Summary for Patients

Clinical Slide Sets

Terms of Use

The In the Clinic® slide sets are owned and copyrighted by the American College of Physicians (ACP). All text, graphics, trademarks, and other intellectual property incorporated into the slide sets remain the sole and exclusive property of the ACP. The slide sets may be used only by the person who downloads or purchases them and only for the purpose of presenting them during not-for-profit educational activities. Users may incorporate the entire slide set or selected individual slides into their own teaching presentations but may not alter the content of the slides in any way or remove the ACP copyright notice. Users may make print copies for use as hand-outs for the audience the user is personally addressing but may not otherwise reproduce or distribute the slides by any means or media, including but not limited to sending them as e-mail attachments, posting them on Internet or Intranet sites, publishing them in meeting proceedings, or making them available for sale or distribution in any unauthorized form, without the express written permission of the ACP. Unauthorized use of the In the Clinic slide sets will constitute copyright infringement.

Toolkit

Buy Now

to gain full access to the content and tools.

Want to Subscribe?

Learn more about subscription options

Advertisement
Related Articles
Journal Club
Related Point of Care
Topic Collections
PubMed Articles
Forgot your password?
Enter your username and email address. We'll send you a reminder to the email address on record.
(Required)
(Required)