0

The full content of Annals is available to subscribers

Subscribe/Learn More  >
Academia and the Profession |

Using Systematic Reviews in Clinical Education

Robert G. Badgett, MD; Mary O'Keefe, MD; and Mark C. Henderson, MD
[+] Article and Author Information

From The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio and the Audie L. Murphy Veterans Administration Hospital, San Antonio, Texas. Series Editors: Cynthia Mulrow, MD, MSc, Deborah Cook; MD, MSc. Acknowledgment: The authors thank the clinical reviewer, Paul F. Speckart, MD. Requests for Reprints: Robert G. Badgett, MD, Department of Medicine, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, 7703 Floyd Curl Drive, San Antonio, TX 78284-7879. Current Author Addresses: Drs. Badgett, O'Keefe, and Henderson: Department of Medicine, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, 7703 Floyd Curl Drive, San Antonio, TX 78284-7879.


Copyright ©2004 by the American College of Physicians


Ann Intern Med. 1997;126(11):886-891. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-126-11-199706010-00006
Text Size: A A A

Traditional educational methods change clinical practice only with considerable effort and difficulty.In particular, the teaching of critical appraisal in the setting of journal clubs does not increase the amount of medical research read by trainees. Experiential learning theory, corroborated by the success of problem-based learning, encourages us to link learning to the numerous medical questions that physicians generate while providing patient care. Systematic reviews can link these questions with the results of research that would otherwise be difficult to locate, read, and appraise.

Systematic reviews are a uniquely powerful mechanism for teaching, and they offer teachers a new opportunity to model rational and effective use of information.Systematic reviews should be made available at clinical sites for use during “teachable moments.” Resistance to the use of systematic reviews can be reduced by using existing journal clubs to teach about the strengths and limitations of these reviews. The point that systematic reviews are meant to assist, not replace, clinical decision making deserves emphasis in such teaching.

Figures

Tables

References

Letters

NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).

Comments

Submit a Comment
Submit a Comment

Summary for Patients

Clinical Slide Sets

Terms of Use

The In the Clinic® slide sets are owned and copyrighted by the American College of Physicians (ACP). All text, graphics, trademarks, and other intellectual property incorporated into the slide sets remain the sole and exclusive property of the ACP. The slide sets may be used only by the person who downloads or purchases them and only for the purpose of presenting them during not-for-profit educational activities. Users may incorporate the entire slide set or selected individual slides into their own teaching presentations but may not alter the content of the slides in any way or remove the ACP copyright notice. Users may make print copies for use as hand-outs for the audience the user is personally addressing but may not otherwise reproduce or distribute the slides by any means or media, including but not limited to sending them as e-mail attachments, posting them on Internet or Intranet sites, publishing them in meeting proceedings, or making them available for sale or distribution in any unauthorized form, without the express written permission of the ACP. Unauthorized use of the In the Clinic slide sets will constitute copyright infringement.

Toolkit

Buy Now

to gain full access to the content and tools.

Want to Subscribe?

Learn more about subscription options

Advertisement
Related Articles
Related Point of Care
Topic Collections
PubMed Articles
Forgot your password?
Enter your username and email address. We'll send you a reminder to the email address on record.
(Required)
(Required)