0

The full content of Annals is available to subscribers

Subscribe/Learn More  >
Position Papers |

Perioperative Assessment and Management of Risk from Coronary Artery Disease

Valerie A. Palda, MD, MSc; and Allan S. Detsky, MD, PhD
[+] Article and Author Information

From the University of Toronto, St. Michael's Hospital, Mount Sinai Hospital, and the Toronto Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Acknowledgment: The authors thank the Clinical Efficacy Assessment Subcommittee, especially Drs. D. Kent and G. Friesinger, for thoughtful review and comments. Grant Support: In part by Ontario Ministry of Health Fellowship 04874 (Dr. Palda), a University of Toronto Fellowship (Dr. Palda), National Health Research Scholar award 6606-2849-48 from Health and Welfare Canada (Dr. Detsky), and a grant from the American College of Physicians. Requests for Reprints: Valerie A. Palda, MD, 4-151, St. Michael's Hospital, 30 Bond Street, Toronto, Ontario M5B 1W8, Canada. Current Author Addresses: Dr. Palda: 4-151, St. Michael's Hospital, 30 Bond Street, Toronto, Ontario M5B 1W8, Canada.


Copyright ©2004 by the American College of Physicians


Ann Intern Med. 1997;127(4):313-328. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-127-4-199708150-00012
Text Size: A A A

Purpose: To summarize available evidence on preoperative cardiac risk stratification so that the internist may 1) use clinical and electrocardiographic findings to stratify a patient's perioperative risk for myocardial infarction and death; 2) decide which tests provide useful additional risk-related information; and 3) understand the benefits, risks, and evidence surrounding the decision to undertake coronary revascularization before elective noncardiac surgery.

Data Sources: A MEDLINE search and review of the reference lists of identified articles. Sensitivities, specificities, and likelihood ratios for diagnostic tests were calculated, and a quality rating for study methods was applied.

Data Extraction: Myocardial infarction and mortality were the major outcomes considered, and a quality rating for study methods was applied.

Data Synthesis: Clinical and electrocardiographic findings, organized by multivariate prediction indices, accurately identify patients as having low, intermediate, or high risk for myocardial infarction or death. Pharmacologic stress imaging with thallium or echocardiography probably improves risk stratification for intermediate-risk patients having vascular surgery. These tests have not been shown to be effective prognostic indicators for patients having nonvascular surgery. No studies of angiography for risk prediction have been reported. Decision analyses and retrospective series suggest that the risks incurred by doing coronary angiography and revascularization before elective surgery outweigh the benefits. Prospective, controlled studies of coronary revascularization are lacking. Evidence from a randomized, controlled trial has shown a survival benefit with the perioperative use of β-blockers in patients at risk for coronary artery disease.

Conclusions: Evaluation of all surgical patients by use of clinical indices is recommended. Low-risk patients need no further evaluation before surgery. High-risk patients need optimal management of their high-risk problems, including (if appropriate) β-blocker use, and may need to have their elective procedures canceled. Intermediate-risk patients probably benefit from further noninvasive stress testing, especially if they are having vascular surgery. Further clinical trials are needed for most areas of concern.

Figures

Tables

References

Letters

NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).

Comments

Submit a Comment
Submit a Comment

Summary for Patients

Clinical Slide Sets

Terms of Use

The In the Clinic® slide sets are owned and copyrighted by the American College of Physicians (ACP). All text, graphics, trademarks, and other intellectual property incorporated into the slide sets remain the sole and exclusive property of the ACP. The slide sets may be used only by the person who downloads or purchases them and only for the purpose of presenting them during not-for-profit educational activities. Users may incorporate the entire slide set or selected individual slides into their own teaching presentations but may not alter the content of the slides in any way or remove the ACP copyright notice. Users may make print copies for use as hand-outs for the audience the user is personally addressing but may not otherwise reproduce or distribute the slides by any means or media, including but not limited to sending them as e-mail attachments, posting them on Internet or Intranet sites, publishing them in meeting proceedings, or making them available for sale or distribution in any unauthorized form, without the express written permission of the ACP. Unauthorized use of the In the Clinic slide sets will constitute copyright infringement.

Toolkit

Buy Now

to gain full access to the content and tools.

Want to Subscribe?

Learn more about subscription options

Advertisement
Related Articles
Related Point of Care
Topic Collections
PubMed Articles

Buy Now

to gain full access to the content and tools.

Want to Subscribe?

Learn more about subscription options

Forgot your password?
Enter your username and email address. We'll send you a reminder to the email address on record.
(Required)
(Required)