0

The full content of Annals is available to subscribers

Subscribe/Learn More  >
Research |

Policy and Program Analysis Using Administrative Databases

Wayne A. Ray, PhD
[+] Article and Author Information

From Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee. Note: This article is one of a series of articles comprising an Annals of Internal Medicine supplement entitled “Measuring Quality, Outcomes, and Cost of Care Using Large Databases: The Sixth Regenstrief Conference.” To see a complete list of the articles included in this supplement, please view its Table of Contents. Grant Support: In part by grant HS07768 from the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research. Requests for Reprints: Wayne A. Ray, PhD, Department of Preventive Medicine, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, A-1124 MCN, Nashville, TN 37232.


Copyright ©2004 by the American College of Physicians


Ann Intern Med. 1997;127(8_Part_2):712-718. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-127-8_Part_2-199710151-00055
Text Size: A A A

Administrative policies and programs play an important and growing role as determinants of the use of medical care. Although some policies and programs may be harmful or ineffectual, randomized, controlled trials or prospective evaluations are rarely done for political or logistic reasons. Most evaluations are retrospective and often use administrative databases. Major problems with such evaluations include poor data quality, lack of concurrent controls, inability to ascertain important study outcomes, and incomplete data on case mix. This article uses published evaluations to illustrate these problems and suggests strategies that can minimize their impact. Such strategies include thorough assessment of data quality, interrupted time-series or policy gradient analysis, restriction of studies to those clinical outcomes that reliably result in medical care, and use of data on medical encounters as surrogates for determining case mix. However, even when these strategies are used, adequate evaluation of the effects of many policies and programs may continue to be impossible. Prospective evaluations need to be used more frequently to ensure that changes are held to the same standard used for other therapeutic interventions.

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 1.
Medicaid expenditures (per person and per year) for nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) before and after implementation of a prior-authorization program.
Grahic Jump Location
Grahic Jump Location
Figure 2.
Changes from 1983 through 1991 in Medicaid enrollment during trimester 1 and inadequate prenatal care among births of women in Tennessee most affected by changes in the Medicaid policy.

Analysis was restricted to married women who lived in Tennessee, had fewer than 12 years of education, were younger than 25 years of age, and had mean neighborhood per capita incomes less than $12 500. The year of enrollment was the year of each woman's last menstrual cycle. Solid line indicates trimesteral enrollment; dashed line indicates inadequate prenatal care.

Grahic Jump Location
Grahic Jump Location
Figure 3.
Correlation between the increase in Medicaid enrollment during trimester 1 and improvement in adequacy of prenatal care.
Grahic Jump Location

Tables

References

Letters

NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).

Comments

Submit a Comment
Submit a Comment

Summary for Patients

Clinical Slide Sets

Terms of Use

The In the Clinic® slide sets are owned and copyrighted by the American College of Physicians (ACP). All text, graphics, trademarks, and other intellectual property incorporated into the slide sets remain the sole and exclusive property of the ACP. The slide sets may be used only by the person who downloads or purchases them and only for the purpose of presenting them during not-for-profit educational activities. Users may incorporate the entire slide set or selected individual slides into their own teaching presentations but may not alter the content of the slides in any way or remove the ACP copyright notice. Users may make print copies for use as hand-outs for the audience the user is personally addressing but may not otherwise reproduce or distribute the slides by any means or media, including but not limited to sending them as e-mail attachments, posting them on Internet or Intranet sites, publishing them in meeting proceedings, or making them available for sale or distribution in any unauthorized form, without the express written permission of the ACP. Unauthorized use of the In the Clinic slide sets will constitute copyright infringement.

Toolkit

Buy Now

to gain full access to the content and tools.

Want to Subscribe?

Learn more about subscription options

Advertisement
Related Articles
Related Point of Care
Topic Collections

Buy Now

to gain full access to the content and tools.

Want to Subscribe?

Learn more about subscription options

Forgot your password?
Enter your username and email address. We'll send you a reminder to the email address on record.
(Required)
(Required)