0

The full content of Annals is available to subscribers

Subscribe/Learn More  >
Academia and the Profession |

The Effectiveness of Intensive Training for Residents in Interviewing: A Randomized, Controlled Study

Robert C. Smith, MD; Judith S. Lyles, PhD; Jennifer Mettler, MA; Bertram E. Stoffelmayr, PhD; Lawrence F. Van Egeren, PhD; Alicia A. Marshall, PhD; Joseph C. Gardiner, PhD; Karen M. Maduschke, MA; Jennifer M. Stanley, MA; Gerald G. Osborn, DO; Valerie Shebroe, PhD; and Ruth B. Greenbaum, MN
[+] Article and Author Information

From Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan. Acknowledgments: The authors thank the Fetzer Institute in Kalamazoo, Michigan; the biopsychosocial programs at the University of Rochester; and the American Academy on Physician and Patient. They also thank the medical school deans; department chairs in medicine, psychiatry, and family practice; program directors in medicine and family practice; general internal medicine division chiefs; and residents at Michigan State University. Grant Support: By a grant from the Fetzer Institute, Kalamazoo, Michigan. Requests for Reprints: Robert C. Smith, MD, B312 Clinical Center, Michigan State University College of Human Medicine, East Lansing, MI 48824. Current Author Addresses: Dr. Smith: B312 Clinical Center, Michigan State University College of Human Medicine, East Lansing, MI 48824.


Copyright ©2004 by the American College of Physicians


Ann Intern Med. 1998;128(2):118-126. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-128-2-199801150-00008
Text Size: A A A

Background: Interviewing and the physician–patient relationship are crucial elements of medical care, but residencies provide little formal instruction in these areas.

Objective: To determine the effects of a training program in interviewing on 1) residents' attitudes toward and skills in interviewing and 2) patients' physical and psychosocial well-being and satisfaction with care.

Design: Randomized, controlled study.

Setting: Two university-based primary care residencies.

Participants: 63 primary care residents in postgraduate year 1.

Intervention: A 1-month, full-time rotation in interviewing and related psychosocial topics.

Measurements: Residents and their patients were assessed before and after the 1-month rotation. Questionnaires were used to assess residents' commitment to interviewing and psychosocial medicine, estimate of the importance of such care, and confidence in their ability to provide such care. Knowledge of interviewing and psychosocial medicine was assessed with a multiple-choice test. Audiotaped interviews with real patients and videotaped interviews with simulated patients were rated for specific interviewing behaviors. Patients' anxiety, depression, and social dysfunction; role limitations; somatic symptom status; and levels of satisfaction with medical visits were assessed by questionnaires and telephone interviews.

Results: Trained residents were superior to untrained residents in knowledge (difference in adjusted post-test mean scores, 15.7% [95% CI, 11% to 20%]); attitudes, such as confidence in psychological sensitivity (difference, 0.61 points on a 7-point scale [CI, 0.32 to 0.91 points]); somatization management (difference, 0.99 points [CI, 0.64 to 1.35 points]); interviewing of real patients (difference, 1.39 points on an 11-point scale [CI, 0.32 to 2.45 points]); and interviewing (data gathering) of simulated patients (difference, 2.67 points [CI, 1.77 to 3.56 points]). Mean differences between the study groups were consistently in the appropriate direction for patient satisfaction and patient well-being, but effect sizes were too small to be considered meaningful.

Conclusion: An intensive 1-month training rotation in interviewing improved residents' knowledge about, attitudes toward, and skills in interviewing.

Figures

Tables

References

Letters

NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).

Comments

Submit a Comment
Submit a Comment

Summary for Patients

Clinical Slide Sets

Terms of Use

The In the Clinic® slide sets are owned and copyrighted by the American College of Physicians (ACP). All text, graphics, trademarks, and other intellectual property incorporated into the slide sets remain the sole and exclusive property of the ACP. The slide sets may be used only by the person who downloads or purchases them and only for the purpose of presenting them during not-for-profit educational activities. Users may incorporate the entire slide set or selected individual slides into their own teaching presentations but may not alter the content of the slides in any way or remove the ACP copyright notice. Users may make print copies for use as hand-outs for the audience the user is personally addressing but may not otherwise reproduce or distribute the slides by any means or media, including but not limited to sending them as e-mail attachments, posting them on Internet or Intranet sites, publishing them in meeting proceedings, or making them available for sale or distribution in any unauthorized form, without the express written permission of the ACP. Unauthorized use of the In the Clinic slide sets will constitute copyright infringement.

Toolkit

Buy Now

to gain full access to the content and tools.

Want to Subscribe?

Learn more about subscription options

Advertisement
Related Articles
Topic Collections
PubMed Articles
Family-centered rounds. Pediatr Clin North Am 2014;61(4):663-70.
Forgot your password?
Enter your username and email address. We'll send you a reminder to the email address on record.
(Required)
(Required)