0

The full content of Annals is available to subscribers

Subscribe/Learn More  >
Brief Communications |

Clinical Reporting to Primary Care Physicians Leads to Increased Use and Understanding of Bone Densitometry and Affects the Management of Osteoporosis: A Randomized Trial

John L. Stock, MD; Catherine E. Waud, MD; James A. Coderre, MS; Judith H. Overdorf, RN, MPH; John S. Janikas, BS; Kathleen M. Heiniluoma; and M. Anne Morris, BS
[+] Article and Author Information

From the Osteoporosis Research and Treatment Center, UMass Memorial Health Care, and University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts. Acknowledgments: The authors thank the primary care physicians for their participation and Carol Gaylord for secretarial support. Grant Support: In part by a grant from the Roger Robinson Fund, UMass Memorial Health Care. Requests for Reprints: John L. Stock, MD, Osteoporosis Research and Treatment Center, UMass Memorial Health Care, 119 Belmont Street, Worcester, MA 01605. Current Author Addresses: Drs. Stock and Waud and Mr. Coderre, Ms. Overdorf, Mr. Janikas, Ms. Heiniluoma, and Ms. Morris: Osteoporosis Research and Treatment Center, UMass Memorial Health Care, 119 Belmont Street, Worcester, MA 01605.


Copyright ©2004 by the American College of Physicians


Ann Intern Med. 1998;128(12_Part_1):996-999. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-128-12_Part_1-199806150-00006
Text Size: A A A

Background: A major barrier to wider use of bone densitometry has been a lack of reports that are comprehensible to primary care physicians.

Objective: To compare the effect of short technical reports and longer clinical reports on use, understanding, and acceptance of bone densitometry by primary care physicians and on management of osteoporosis.

Design: Randomized trial.

Setting: Osteoporosis center of a community teaching hospital.

Subjects: 57 primary care physicians ordering bone mineral density tests with dual x-ray absorptiometry.

Intervention: Physicians were randomly assigned to receive short technical reports or long clinical reports written by endocrinologists with access to clinical information.

Measurements: Physicians were interviewed by telephone after receiving at least two reports.

Results: Before being interviewed, physicians receiving short reports ordered a mean ±SD of 0.72 ± 0.71 tests per month; those receiving long reports ordered 1.30 ± 1.21 tests per month (P = 0.002). At the first interview, 30% of physicians receiving short reports and 86% of those receiving long reports understood the bone mineral density definition of osteoporosis (P < 0.001). Receiving long reports led to more modifications in the pharmacologic treatment of osteoporosis by gynecologists (19% of patients whose reports were short and 61% of patients whose reports were long; P = 0.021) and less confusion about reports by all physicians (36% of physicians receiving short reports and 1% of those receiving long reports; P = 0.003).

Conclusions: Clinical reporting of bone densitometry to primary care physicians increased use and understanding of bone densitometry, changed management of osteoporosis, and was well accepted. It may help achieve appropriate use of bone densitometry and may allow convenient dissemination of information on osteoporosis.

Figures

Tables

References

Letters

NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).

Comments

Submit a Comment
Submit a Comment

Summary for Patients

Clinical Slide Sets

Terms of Use

The In the Clinic® slide sets are owned and copyrighted by the American College of Physicians (ACP). All text, graphics, trademarks, and other intellectual property incorporated into the slide sets remain the sole and exclusive property of the ACP. The slide sets may be used only by the person who downloads or purchases them and only for the purpose of presenting them during not-for-profit educational activities. Users may incorporate the entire slide set or selected individual slides into their own teaching presentations but may not alter the content of the slides in any way or remove the ACP copyright notice. Users may make print copies for use as hand-outs for the audience the user is personally addressing but may not otherwise reproduce or distribute the slides by any means or media, including but not limited to sending them as e-mail attachments, posting them on Internet or Intranet sites, publishing them in meeting proceedings, or making them available for sale or distribution in any unauthorized form, without the express written permission of the ACP. Unauthorized use of the In the Clinic slide sets will constitute copyright infringement.

Toolkit

Buy Now

to gain full access to the content and tools.

Want to Subscribe?

Learn more about subscription options

Advertisement
Related Articles
Related Point of Care
Topic Collections
PubMed Articles

Buy Now

to gain full access to the content and tools.

Want to Subscribe?

Learn more about subscription options

Forgot your password?
Enter your username and email address. We'll send you a reminder to the email address on record.
(Required)
(Required)