The full content of Annals is available to subscribers

Subscribe/Learn More  >
Reviews |

The Medical Consultant's Role in Caring for Patients with Hip Fracture

R. Sean Morrison, MD; Mark R. Chassin, MD, MPP, MPH; and Albert L. Siu, MD, MSPH
[+] Article, Author, and Disclosure Information

From Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, New York. Acknowledgment: The authors thank Jay Magaziner, PhD, MSHyg, for permission to cite unpublished data from the Baltimore Hip Fracture Study. Grant Support: In part by no. U18HS09459-0 from the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research. Dr. Morrison is a Brookdale National Fellow. Requests for Reprints: R. Sean Morrison, MD, Department of Geriatrics, Box 1070, The Mount Sinai School of Medicine, One Gustave L. Levy Place, New York, NY 10029; e-mail smorriso@smtplink.mssm.edu. Current Author Addresses: Dr. Morrison: Department of Geriatrics, Box 1070, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, One Gustave L. Levy Place, New York, NY 10029.

Copyright ©2004 by the American College of Physicians

Ann Intern Med. 1998;128(12_Part_1):1010-1020. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-128-12_Part_1-199806150-00010
Text Size: A A A

Background: Hip fractures are an important cause of death and functional dependence in the United States.

Purpose: To review the evidence for clinical decisions that medical consultants make for patients with hip fracture and to develop recommendations for care.

Data Sources: Published reports of clinical studies were found by searching MEDLINE and selected bibliographies.

Study Selection: Studies were included if data were presented on clinical interventions to improve care of conditions typically encountered by medical consultants in the care of patients with hip fracture. Such conditions include timing of surgery, infection prophylaxis, thromboembolic prophylaxis, postoperative nutritional management, urinary tract management, prevention and management of delirium, application and timing of rehabilitation services, and prevention of subsequent falls. Meta-analyses; randomized, controlled trials; or other controlled studies were included if possible. If no such trials were identified, the best evidence from studies with other designs was included.

Data Extraction: Interventions were selected on the basis of their efficacy or potential efficacy in improving functional outcome. Trials with positive and negative results were compared for differences in intervention and strength of study methods.

Data Synthesis: Strong evidence supports medical recommendations for decisions about timing and duration of prophylactic antibiotics, selection of thromboembolic prophylaxis, urinary tract and nutritional management, and rehabilitative services. Many case series support early surgical repair, although patients who would benefit from delay and further medical work-up have not been well identified. Evidence for decisions about assessment of subsequent risk for fall and risk for and management of delirium is based largely on data from patients without hip fracture but is probably applicable. Future research should target optimal duration of thromboembolic prophylaxis, cost-effectiveness of low-molecular-weight heparin compared with that of other thromboembolic prophylactic regimens, management of delirium, rehabilitative services, and efficacy of assessment of risk for later falls.

Conclusions: The data suggest that evidence-based medical care can improve hip fracture outcomes. The medical consultant has a key role in providing this care and managing the preoperative conditions and postoperative complications that may affect optimal functional recovery.


hip fractures





Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).


Submit a Comment/Letter
Submit a Comment/Letter

Summary for Patients

Clinical Slide Sets

Terms of Use

The In the Clinic® slide sets are owned and copyrighted by the American College of Physicians (ACP). All text, graphics, trademarks, and other intellectual property incorporated into the slide sets remain the sole and exclusive property of the ACP. The slide sets may be used only by the person who downloads or purchases them and only for the purpose of presenting them during not-for-profit educational activities. Users may incorporate the entire slide set or selected individual slides into their own teaching presentations but may not alter the content of the slides in any way or remove the ACP copyright notice. Users may make print copies for use as hand-outs for the audience the user is personally addressing but may not otherwise reproduce or distribute the slides by any means or media, including but not limited to sending them as e-mail attachments, posting them on Internet or Intranet sites, publishing them in meeting proceedings, or making them available for sale or distribution in any unauthorized form, without the express written permission of the ACP. Unauthorized use of the In the Clinic slide sets will constitute copyright infringement.


Buy Now for $32.00

to gain full access to the content and tools.

Want to Subscribe?

Learn more about subscription options

Related Articles
Related Point of Care
Topic Collections
PubMed Articles
Gout and Risk of Fracture in Women: A Prospective Cohort Study. Arthritis Rheumatol Published online Sep 2, 2016;
Forgot your password?
Enter your username and email address. We'll send you a reminder to the email address on record.