0

The full content of Annals is available to subscribers

Subscribe/Learn More  >
Editorials |

Deconstructing the White Coat

William T. Branch Jr., MD
[+] Article and Author Information

Emory University School of Medicine; Atlanta, GA 30322 Requests for Reprints: William T. Branch Jr., MD, The Emory Clinic, 1525 Clifton Road NE, 4th Floor, Atlanta, GA 30322.


Copyright ©2004 by the American College of Physicians


Ann Intern Med. 1998;129(9):740-742. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-129-9-199811010-00012
Text Size: A A A

White coat ceremonies of one kind or another have long marked the entry of medical students into clinical work. As donned by physicians in the late 19th century, the white coat signified the scientific method and the adoption of aseptic techniques. The white coat ceremonies now in vogue emphasize the humanistic values also symbolized by the coat. Adoption of these ceremonies for entering students by 93 medical schools in the United States in 1998 suggests that both students and faculty find the ceremonies uplifting and meaningful. After all, science, medicine, and humanism are intertwined in western history and culture. Yet as we look at traditional ceremonies in medicine from the perspective of today's diverse student body and faculty, we can also see the extent to which elitism and professional hierarchy have been present in the medical profession. It should not surprise us, therefore, that when a thinker like Wear deconstructs the meaning of the white coat ceremony in this issue [1], she perceives a darker symbolism hidden behind the altruism, compassion, and excellence embraced by the ceremony's participants. She questions “whether the ceremony … is the best vehicle through which to encourage compassionate and humble caregiving.” As an alternative to the white coat ceremony, she proposes “first Fridays” on which students would visit community sites, such as free clinics, domestic violence shelters, rape crisis centers, and drug treatment programs. Such visits would give students access to the perspectives of disadvantaged persons.

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview

Figures

Tables

References

Letters

NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).

Comments

Submit a Comment
Submit a Comment

Summary for Patients

Clinical Slide Sets

Terms of Use

The In the Clinic® slide sets are owned and copyrighted by the American College of Physicians (ACP). All text, graphics, trademarks, and other intellectual property incorporated into the slide sets remain the sole and exclusive property of the ACP. The slide sets may be used only by the person who downloads or purchases them and only for the purpose of presenting them during not-for-profit educational activities. Users may incorporate the entire slide set or selected individual slides into their own teaching presentations but may not alter the content of the slides in any way or remove the ACP copyright notice. Users may make print copies for use as hand-outs for the audience the user is personally addressing but may not otherwise reproduce or distribute the slides by any means or media, including but not limited to sending them as e-mail attachments, posting them on Internet or Intranet sites, publishing them in meeting proceedings, or making them available for sale or distribution in any unauthorized form, without the express written permission of the ACP. Unauthorized use of the In the Clinic slide sets will constitute copyright infringement.

Toolkit

Buy Now

to gain full access to the content and tools.

Want to Subscribe?

Learn more about subscription options

Advertisement
Related Articles
Related Point of Care
Topic Collections
Forgot your password?
Enter your username and email address. We'll send you a reminder to the email address on record.
(Required)
(Required)