0

The full content of Annals is available to subscribers

Subscribe/Learn More  >
Articles |

Effects of Estrogen and Estrogen–Progestin on Mammographic Parenchymal Density

Gail A. Greendale, MD; Beth A. Reboussin, PhD; Angela Sie, MD; H. Rosy Singh, MD; Linda K. Olson, MD; Olga Gatewood, MD; Lawrence W. Bassett, MD; Carol Wasilauskas, RN, MS; Trudy Bush, PhD; Elizabeth Barrett-Connor, MD, for the Postmenopausal Estrogen/Progestin Interventions (PEPI) Investigators*
[+] Article and Author Information

From University of California, Los Angeles, School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California; Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina; Johns Hopkins University and University of Maryland Medical School, Baltimore, Maryland; and University of California at San Diego, San Diego, California.


Ann Intern Med. 1999;130(4_Part_1):262-268. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-130-4_Part_1-199902160-00003
Text Size: A A A

Background: In longitudinal studies, greater mammographic density is associated with an increased risk for breast cancer.

Objective: To assess differences between placebo, estrogen, and three estrogen–progestin regimens on change in mammographic density.

Design: Subset analysis of a 3-year, multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial.

Setting: Seven ambulatory study centers.

Participants: 307 of the 875 women in the Postmenopausal Estrogen/Progestin Interventions Trial. Participants had a baseline mammogram and at least one follow-up mammogram available, adhered to treatment, had not taken estrogen for at least 5 years before baseline, and did not have breast implants.

Intervention: Treatments were placebo, conjugated equine estrogens (CEE), CEE plus cyclic medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA), CEE plus daily MPA, and CEE plus cyclic micronized progesterone (MP).

Measurements: Change in radiographic density (according to American College of Radiology Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System grades) on mammography.

Results: Almost all increases in mammographic density occurred within the first year. At 12 months, the percentage of women with density grade increases was 0% (95% CI, 0.0% to 4.6%) in the placebo group, 3.5% (CI, 1.0% to 12.0%) in the CEE group, 23.5% (CI, 11.9% to 35.1%) in the CEE plus cyclic MPA group, 19.4% (CI, 9.9% to 28.9%) in the CEE plus daily MPA group, and 16.4% (CI, 6.6% to 26.2%) in the CEE plus cyclic MP group. At 12 months, the odds of an increase in mammographic density were 13.1 (95% CI, 2.4 to 73.3) with CEE plus cyclic MPA, 9.0 (CI, 1.6 to 50.1) with CEE plus daily MPA, and 7.2 (CI, 1.3 to 40.0) with CEE plus cyclic micronized progesterone compared with CEE alone.

Conclusions: Further study of the magnitude and meaning of increased mammographic density due to use of estrogen and estrogen–progestins is warranted because mammographic density may be a marker for risk for breast cancer.

*For a partial list of the PEPI Investigators, see Appendix.

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Figure.
Diagram of the Postmenopausal Estrogen/Progestin Interventions (PEPI) Trial mammographic density study showing numbers of and reasons for exclusions.

HRT = hormone replacement therapy.

Grahic Jump Location

Tables

References

Letters

NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).

Comments

Submit a Comment
Submit a Comment

Summary for Patients

Clinical Slide Sets

Terms of Use

The In the Clinic® slide sets are owned and copyrighted by the American College of Physicians (ACP). All text, graphics, trademarks, and other intellectual property incorporated into the slide sets remain the sole and exclusive property of the ACP. The slide sets may be used only by the person who downloads or purchases them and only for the purpose of presenting them during not-for-profit educational activities. Users may incorporate the entire slide set or selected individual slides into their own teaching presentations but may not alter the content of the slides in any way or remove the ACP copyright notice. Users may make print copies for use as hand-outs for the audience the user is personally addressing but may not otherwise reproduce or distribute the slides by any means or media, including but not limited to sending them as e-mail attachments, posting them on Internet or Intranet sites, publishing them in meeting proceedings, or making them available for sale or distribution in any unauthorized form, without the express written permission of the ACP. Unauthorized use of the In the Clinic slide sets will constitute copyright infringement.

Toolkit

Buy Now

to gain full access to the content and tools.

Want to Subscribe?

Learn more about subscription options

Advertisement
Related Articles
Related Point of Care
Topic Collections
PubMed Articles
Forgot your password?
Enter your username and email address. We'll send you a reminder to the email address on record.
(Required)
(Required)