0

The full content of Annals is available to subscribers

Subscribe/Learn More  >
Articles |

Relations among CD4 Lymphocyte Count Nadir, Antiretroviral Therapy, and HIV-1 Disease Progression: Results from the EuroSIDA Study

Veronica Miller, PhD; Amanda Mocroft, PhD; Peter Reiss, MD; Christine Katlama, MD; Anthony I. Papadopoulos, MD; Terese Katzenstein, MD; Jan van Lunzen, MD; Francisco Antunes, MD; Andrew N. Phillips, PhD; Jens D. Lundgren, MD, for the EuroSIDA Study Group*
[+] Article and Author Information

From J.W. Goethe-Universität, Zentrum der Inneren Medizin, Frankfurt, Germany, and Universitätsklinikum Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Royal Free Centre for HIV Medicine, London, United Kingdom; Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Hôpital de la Pitiè-Salpêtière, Paris, France; 1st IKA Hospital, Athens, Greece; Rigshospitalet and Hvidovre University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark; and Hospital Santa Maria, Lisbon, Portugal.


Ann Intern Med. 1999;130(7):570-577. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-130-7-199904060-00005
Text Size: A A A

Background: The effect of previous CD4 cell count nadir on clinical progression in patients with increases in CD4 cell counts has not been investigated.

Objective: To assess risk for progression of HIV disease in patients with CD4 counts of at least 200 cells/mm3 (stratified by the lowest previous CD4 count) and compare the rate of progression in patients with CD4 counts less than 50 cells/mm3 with that in patients whose CD4 counts rebounded from less than 50 cells/mm3 to at least 200 cells/mm3.

Design: Prospective, observational multicenter study.

Setting: 52 HIV outpatient clinics in Europe.

Patients: Two groups were identified: those with CD4 counts of at least 200 cells/mm3 (group A) and those with CD4 counts less than 50 cells/mm3 (group B). Group A was stratified according to the lowest previous CD4 count: at least 150 cells/mm3 (stratum 1), 100 to 149 cells/mm3 (stratum 2), 50 to 99 cells/mm3 (stratum 3), and 1 to 50 cells/mm3 (stratum 4).

Measurements: Patients were followed until a progression event occurred (first AIDS-defining event, new AIDS-defining event, or death) or until the CD4 count decreased to less than 200 cells/mm3 (group A) or increased to more than 50 cells/mm3 (group B). Incidence rates were based on a patient-years analysis and reported as events per 100 patient-years of follow-up; the relative hazards for progression were based on Cox proportional-hazards models.

Results: The overall rate of disease progression in group A was 3.9 per 100 patient-years (95% CI, 3.5 to 4.3 per 100 patient-years), whereas in group B it was much higher (72.9 per 100 patient-years [CI, 69.0 to 76.8 per 100 patient-years]). In group A, the rate increased in patients with previous low CD4 cell count nadirs, resulting in a significant increase in the relative hazard for progression. The relative hazards for strata 2, 3, and 4 were 2.29 (CI, 1.30 to 4.03), 3.65 (CI, 1.94 to 6.85), and 2.94 (CI, 1.44 to 6.00), respectively.

Conclusions: Increases in CD4 counts from very low levels to at least 200 cells/mm3 are associated with a much reduced rate of disease progression. However, a previously low CD4 cell count nadir remains associated with a moderately higher risk for disease progression among patients with CD4 counts of at least 200 cells/mm3.

*For members of the EuroSIDA Study Group, see Appendix.

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Figure.
Study design.3solid-line graphs3broken-line graph33

Disease progression for patients in group A was measured when CD4 count first reached a value of at least 200 cells/mm . Patients were stratified according to the previous CD4 cell nadir ( ). Follow-up for patients in group B began when the CD4 count first decreased to less than 50 cells/mm ( ). Dotted lines indicate the limits (≥ 200 cells/mm or <50 cells/mm ) used to define patient group A and group B.

Grahic Jump Location

Tables

References

Letters

NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).

Comments

Submit a Comment
Submit a Comment

Summary for Patients

Clinical Slide Sets

Terms of Use

The In the Clinic® slide sets are owned and copyrighted by the American College of Physicians (ACP). All text, graphics, trademarks, and other intellectual property incorporated into the slide sets remain the sole and exclusive property of the ACP. The slide sets may be used only by the person who downloads or purchases them and only for the purpose of presenting them during not-for-profit educational activities. Users may incorporate the entire slide set or selected individual slides into their own teaching presentations but may not alter the content of the slides in any way or remove the ACP copyright notice. Users may make print copies for use as hand-outs for the audience the user is personally addressing but may not otherwise reproduce or distribute the slides by any means or media, including but not limited to sending them as e-mail attachments, posting them on Internet or Intranet sites, publishing them in meeting proceedings, or making them available for sale or distribution in any unauthorized form, without the express written permission of the ACP. Unauthorized use of the In the Clinic slide sets will constitute copyright infringement.

Toolkit

Buy Now

to gain full access to the content and tools.

Want to Subscribe?

Learn more about subscription options

Advertisement
Related Articles
Related Point of Care
Topic Collections
PubMed Articles
Forgot your password?
Enter your username and email address. We'll send you a reminder to the email address on record.
(Required)
(Required)