0

The full content of Annals is available to subscribers

Subscribe/Learn More  >
Updates |

Combination Therapy with Multiple Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs in Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Preventive Strategy

Theodore Pincus, MD; James R. O'Dell, MD; and Joel M. Kremer, MD
[+] Article and Author Information

From Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee; University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska; and Albany Medical College, Albany, New York.


Grant Support: By the Jack C. Massey Foundation, Maury County Lupus Fund, and the Arthritis Foundation.

Requests for Reprints: Theodore Pincus, MD, Division of Rheumatology and Immunology, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, 203 Oxford House, Box 5, Nashville, TN 37232-4500.

Current Author Addresses: Dr. Pincus: Division of Rheumatology and Immunology, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, 203 Oxford House, Box 5, Nashville, TN 37232-4500.

Dr. O'Dell: Department of Internal Medicine, University of Nebraska Medical Center, 983025 Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE 68198-3025.

Dr. Kremer: Division of Rheumatology, Albany Medical College, 47 New Scotland Avenue, Albany, NY 12208.


Ann Intern Med. 1999;131(10):768-774. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-131-10-199911160-00009
Text Size: A A A

Rheumatoid arthritis is a progressive inflammatory disease that affects 0.5% to 1% of the population and involves costs of approximately 1% of the U.S. gross national product (1). Historically, most patients with rheumatoid arthritis were treated according to a “pyramid” (2) or sequential (3) strategy, beginning with a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug. Clinicians sought to avoid using disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs until evidence of joint damage was seen. However, this strategy was ineffective over more than a few years (45); most patients experienced poor long-term outcomes, including severe functional declines (6), radiographic progression (7), considerable economic losses (8), work disability (9), and premature mortality (6, 10). Unfavorable outcomes were predicted primarily by more severe disease and rarely were secondary to drug toxicity (1112). Patients with the poorest functional status and more involved joints had a 5-year survival rate of 50% or less, similar to survival seen in stage IV Hodgkin disease or three-vessel coronary artery disease in the 1970s (Figure) (10, 1314). Therefore, current approaches to rheumatoid arthritis emphasize aggressive control of inflammation to prevent long-term damage; this strategy may be analogous to tight control of dysregulation in diabetes or hypertension to prevent organ damage.

First Page Preview

View Large
/>
First page PDF preview

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Figure.
Survival over 9 to 10 years of patients with coronary artery disease (top left) (data from Cleveland Clinic, 1978), Hodgkin disease (top right) (data from Stanford University, 1972), and rheumatoid arthritis (bottom leftandbottom right) (data from Vanderbilt University, 1987) in relation to baseline disease markers.

Patients with the most severe clinical status had survival rates of 40% to 60% over the subsequent 5 years, including patients with three involved vessels or left main disease, stage IV Hodgkin disease, or more than 30 involved joints or poor functional status in rheumatoid arthritis. By contrast, 5-year survival rates of 90% were seen in patients with most favorable baseline clinical status—right coronary artery one-vessel disease, stage I or II Hodgkin disease, and few involved joints and good functional status in rheumatoid arthritis. ADL = activities of daily living. Reproduced with permission from Pincus T, Callahan LF. Taking mortality in rheumatoid arthritis seriously—predictive markers, socioeconomic status and comorbidity. J Rheumatol. 1986;13:841-5.

Grahic Jump Location

Tables

References

Letters

NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).

Comments

Submit a Comment
Submit a Comment

Summary for Patients

Clinical Slide Sets

Terms of Use

The In the Clinic® slide sets are owned and copyrighted by the American College of Physicians (ACP). All text, graphics, trademarks, and other intellectual property incorporated into the slide sets remain the sole and exclusive property of the ACP. The slide sets may be used only by the person who downloads or purchases them and only for the purpose of presenting them during not-for-profit educational activities. Users may incorporate the entire slide set or selected individual slides into their own teaching presentations but may not alter the content of the slides in any way or remove the ACP copyright notice. Users may make print copies for use as hand-outs for the audience the user is personally addressing but may not otherwise reproduce or distribute the slides by any means or media, including but not limited to sending them as e-mail attachments, posting them on Internet or Intranet sites, publishing them in meeting proceedings, or making them available for sale or distribution in any unauthorized form, without the express written permission of the ACP. Unauthorized use of the In the Clinic slide sets will constitute copyright infringement.

Toolkit

Buy Now

to gain full access to the content and tools.

Want to Subscribe?

Learn more about subscription options

Advertisement
Related Articles
Related Point of Care
Topic Collections
PubMed Articles

Buy Now

to gain full access to the content and tools.

Want to Subscribe?

Learn more about subscription options

Forgot your password?
Enter your username and email address. We'll send you a reminder to the email address on record.
(Required)
(Required)