The full content of Annals is available to subscribers

Subscribe/Learn More  >
Ideas and Opinions |

Caring and Cost: The Challenge for Physician Advocacy

Steven D. Pearson, MD, MSc
[+] Article, Author, and Disclosure Information

Copyright ©2004 by the American College of Physicians

Ann Intern Med. 2000;133(2):148-153. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-133-2-200007180-00014
Text Size: A A A

How should physicians respond to the growing tension between care and cost? One option is to reinforce the ideal of doing everything to further the best interests of the individual patient. Others, however, have argued that because health care resources are shared and limited, physicians should consciously participate in rationing by saying “no” to patients' requests for some marginally beneficial services.

But even physicians who endorse the idea of rationing wonder whether patient–physician relationships could ever survive a frank admission of rationing at the bedside. This article explores the idea that caring about costs can be brought to the bedside in a way that will sustain trust among patients and the public. By illustrating a hypothetical case and the ensuing conversation between a physician and her patient, a mode of “proportional” patient advocacy is presented in which physicians can remain forceful agents for patient good while acting within a framework that admits to the boundaries of responsible budgets for health care needs.


Grahic Jump Location
Two models of physician advocacy.Top. Darwinian advocacy.Bottom. Proportional advocacy.

In this model, societal pressures to control costs are applied unevenly, and even capriciously, resulting in a competitive relationship among patient–physician dyads for available resources. Some patient–physician dyads gain preferential access to services, whereas others are forced to accept less. In this model, patients and physicians are viewed as part of a moral community in which costs are controlled through group deliberation and decision making. Physicians are called upon to ration at the bedside with the open knowledge and collaboration of their patients and the broader community.

Grahic Jump Location




Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).


Submit a Comment/Letter
Submit a Comment/Letter

Summary for Patients

Clinical Slide Sets

Terms of Use

The In the Clinic® slide sets are owned and copyrighted by the American College of Physicians (ACP). All text, graphics, trademarks, and other intellectual property incorporated into the slide sets remain the sole and exclusive property of the ACP. The slide sets may be used only by the person who downloads or purchases them and only for the purpose of presenting them during not-for-profit educational activities. Users may incorporate the entire slide set or selected individual slides into their own teaching presentations but may not alter the content of the slides in any way or remove the ACP copyright notice. Users may make print copies for use as hand-outs for the audience the user is personally addressing but may not otherwise reproduce or distribute the slides by any means or media, including but not limited to sending them as e-mail attachments, posting them on Internet or Intranet sites, publishing them in meeting proceedings, or making them available for sale or distribution in any unauthorized form, without the express written permission of the ACP. Unauthorized use of the In the Clinic slide sets will constitute copyright infringement.


Buy Now for $32.00

to gain full access to the content and tools.

Want to Subscribe?

Learn more about subscription options

Related Articles
Topic Collections
PubMed Articles
Forgot your password?
Enter your username and email address. We'll send you a reminder to the email address on record.