The full content of Annals is available to subscribers

Subscribe/Learn More  >
Original Research |

Videotape-Based Decision Aid for Colon Cancer Screening: A Randomized, Controlled Trial

Michael Pignone, MD, MPH; Russell Harris, MD, MPH; and Linda Kinsinger, MD, MPH
[+] Article, Author, and Disclosure Information

Copyright ©2004 by the American College of Physicians

Ann Intern Med. 2000;133(10):761-769. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-133-10-200011210-00008
Text Size: A A A

Background: Rates of colon cancer screening in the United States are low, in part because of poor communication between patients and providers about the availability of effective screening options.

Objective: To test whether a decision aid consisting of an educational video, targeted brochure, and chart marker increased performance of colon cancer screening in primary care practices.

Design: Randomized, controlled trial.

Setting: Three community primary care practices in central North Carolina.

Patients: 1657 consecutive adult patients 50 to 75 years of age were contacted. Of these, 651 (39%) agreed to participate; 249 of the 651 participants (38%) were eligible. Eligible patients had no personal or family history of colon cancer and had not had fecal occult blood testing in the past year or flexible sigmoidoscopy, colonoscopy, or barium enema in the past 5 years.

Intervention: The 249 participants were randomly assigned to view an 11-minute video about colon cancer screening (intervention group) or a video about automobile safety (control group). After viewing the video, intervention group participants chose a color-coded educational brochure (based on stages of change) to indicate their degree of interest in screening. A chart marker of the same color was attached to their charts. Controls received a generic brochure on automobile safety, and no chart marker was attached.

Measurements: Frequency of screening test ordering as reported by participants and frequency of completion of screening tests as verified by chart review.

Results: Fecal occult blood testing or flexible sigmoidoscopy was ordered for 47.2% of intervention participants and 26.4% of controls (difference, 20.8 percentage points [95% CI, 8.6 to 32.9 percentage points]). Screening tests were completed by 36.8% of the intervention group and 22.6% of the control group (difference, 14.2 percentage points [CI, 3.0 to 25.4 percentage points]).

Conclusion: A decision aid consisting of an educational video, brochure, and chart marker increased ordering and performance of colon cancer screening tests.


Grahic Jump Location
Flow diagram of trial.

* Reasons for nonparticipation were as follows: patient reported insufficient time to come in early ( = 236), patient could not be reached by telephone ( = 233), patient did not arrive early enough to participate ( = 201), patient called back for appointment early ( = 183), patient had been previously contacted ( = 57), patient was uninterested in participating ( = 42), patient was too sick ( = 42), or other ( = 12). Because of an administrative error, 20 participants did not complete questionnaire 2 ( ) and 19 did not complete questionnaire 3 ( ). Chart review data were available for 247 of 249 participants (99%).

Grahic Jump Location




Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).


Submit a Comment/Letter
Submit a Comment/Letter

Summary for Patients

A Videotape-Based Decision Aid for Colon Cancer Screening

Copyright ©2004 by the American College of Physicians


Clinical Slide Sets

Terms of Use

The In the Clinic® slide sets are owned and copyrighted by the American College of Physicians (ACP). All text, graphics, trademarks, and other intellectual property incorporated into the slide sets remain the sole and exclusive property of the ACP. The slide sets may be used only by the person who downloads or purchases them and only for the purpose of presenting them during not-for-profit educational activities. Users may incorporate the entire slide set or selected individual slides into their own teaching presentations but may not alter the content of the slides in any way or remove the ACP copyright notice. Users may make print copies for use as hand-outs for the audience the user is personally addressing but may not otherwise reproduce or distribute the slides by any means or media, including but not limited to sending them as e-mail attachments, posting them on Internet or Intranet sites, publishing them in meeting proceedings, or making them available for sale or distribution in any unauthorized form, without the express written permission of the ACP. Unauthorized use of the In the Clinic slide sets will constitute copyright infringement.


Buy Now for $32.00

to gain full access to the content and tools.

Want to Subscribe?

Learn more about subscription options

Related Articles
Related Point of Care
Topic Collections
PubMed Articles
Forgot your password?
Enter your username and email address. We'll send you a reminder to the email address on record.