The full content of Annals is available to subscribers

Subscribe/Learn More  >
Brief Communications |

Paying Research Subjects: An Analysis of Current Policies

Neal Dickert, BA; Ezekiel Emanuel, MD, PhD; and Christine Grady, PhD
[+] Article, Author, and Disclosure Information

From W.G. Magnuson Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.

Acknowledgments: The authors are grateful for the help and involvement of the representatives of participating organizations. They also thank persons who reviewed the manuscript. Names of these persons are not included to protect the confidentiality of participating organizations.

Grant Support: By W.G. Magnuson Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health.

Requests for Single Reprints: Christine Grady, PhD, Department of Clinical Bioethics, W.G. Magnuson Clinical Center, Building 10/1C118, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892-1156; e-mail, cgrady@nih.gov.

Current Author Addresses: Mr. Dickert: 2626 East Baltimore Street, Baltimore, MD 21224.

Drs. Emanuel and Grady: Department of Clinical Bioethics, W.G. Magnuson Clinical Center, Building 10/1C118, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892-1156.

Author Contributions: Conception and design: E. Emanuel, C. Grady.

Analysis and interpretation of the data: N. Dickert, E. Emanuel, C. Grady.

Drafting of the article: N. Dickert, E. Emanuel, C. Grady.

Critical revision of the article for important intellectual content: N. Dickert, E. Emanuel, C. Grady.

Obtaining of funding: C. Grady.

Collection and assembly of data: N. Dickert, C. Grady.

Ann Intern Med. 2002;136(5):368-373. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-136-5-200203050-00009
Text Size: A A A

Background: Few data are available on guidelines used by research organizations to make decisions about paying subjects.

Objective: To analyze existing guidance regarding payment of research subjects and to identify common characteristics and areas for further research.

Design: Descriptive content analysis of policies.

Measurements: Written policies and rules of thumb about paying subjects from 32 U.S. research organizations.

Results: Of 32 organizations, 37.5% had written guidelines about paying subjects; all but 1 reported having rules of thumb. Few (18.8%) were able to provide a confident estimate of the proportion of studies that pay subjects. Organizations reported that investigators and institutional review boards make payment decisions and that both healthy and ill subjects in some studies are paid for their time (87%), for inconvenience (84%), for travel (68%), as incentive (58%), or for incurring risk (32%). Most organizations require that payment be prorated (84%) and described in the consent document (94%).

Conclusions: Most organizations pay some research subjects, but few have written policies on payment. Because investigators and institutional review boards make payment decisions with little specific guidance, standards vary.





Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).


Submit a Comment
Submit a Comment

Summary for Patients

Paying Research Subjects: A Survey of Current Policies

The summary below is from the full report titled “Paying Research Subjects: An Analysis of Current Policies.” It is in the 5 March 2002 issue of Annals of Internal Medicine (volume 136, pages 368-373). The authors are N Dickert, E Emanuel, and C Grady.


Clinical Slide Sets

Terms of Use

The In the Clinic® slide sets are owned and copyrighted by the American College of Physicians (ACP). All text, graphics, trademarks, and other intellectual property incorporated into the slide sets remain the sole and exclusive property of the ACP. The slide sets may be used only by the person who downloads or purchases them and only for the purpose of presenting them during not-for-profit educational activities. Users may incorporate the entire slide set or selected individual slides into their own teaching presentations but may not alter the content of the slides in any way or remove the ACP copyright notice. Users may make print copies for use as hand-outs for the audience the user is personally addressing but may not otherwise reproduce or distribute the slides by any means or media, including but not limited to sending them as e-mail attachments, posting them on Internet or Intranet sites, publishing them in meeting proceedings, or making them available for sale or distribution in any unauthorized form, without the express written permission of the ACP. Unauthorized use of the In the Clinic slide sets will constitute copyright infringement.


Buy Now

to gain full access to the content and tools.

Want to Subscribe?

Learn more about subscription options

Related Articles
Topic Collections
PubMed Articles
Trends in research involving human beings in Brazil. Rev Panam Salud Publica 2015;37(2):118-24.
Forgot your password?
Enter your username and email address. We'll send you a reminder to the email address on record.