0
Summaries for Patients |

A Diabetes Report Card for the United States, 1988–1995 FREE

[+] Article and Author Information

The summary below is from the full report titled “A Diabetes Report Card for the United States: Quality of Care in the 1990s.” It is in the 16 April 2002 issue of Annals of Internal Medicine (volume 136, pages 565-574). The authors are JB Saaddine, MM Engelgau, GL Beckles, EW Gregg, TJ Thompson, and KMV Narayan.


Ann Intern Med. 2002;136(8):I24. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-136-8-200204160-00001
Text Size: A A A

What is the problem and what is known about it so far?

Diabetes mellitus is a common disease that interferes with the body's ability to store energy from food. The pancreas makes a substance called insulin that helps to store energy from food. Type 1 diabetes mellitus (also called juvenile diabetes) occurs when the pancreas stops making insulin. In type 2 diabetes mellitus (also called adult-onset diabetes), the body makes plenty of insulin but is unable to use it normally. In both cases, the result is high blood sugar levels. Over time, high blood sugar levels can lead to blindness, kidney failure, nerve damage, and heart disease. Fortunately, good care with diet, exercise, and medications to keep blood sugar under control can prevent the development of these serious, costly complications. The control of blood pressure and cholesterol is also very important for patients with diabetes. Because it is possible to accomplish so much with good care, it is important to know about the general quality of diabetes care in the United States. To date, no one has provided a “national report card” to show how well the United States is achieving the promise of medical care for diabetes.

Why did the researchers do this particular study?

To estimate the general quality of diabetes care in the United States.

Who was studied?

The researchers used information from two studies. In one, 1026 adults with diabetes answered a large national survey about health and nutrition. In the other, 3059 patients with diabetes participated in a study of behavior-related risk factors.

How was the study done?

The researchers used this information to estimate the numbers of diabetic Americans who had adequate control of blood sugar, blood pressure, and cholesterol and who had recommended yearly eye and foot examinations.

What did the researchers find?

Many patients had inadequate control of blood sugar (18%), blood pressure (34%), and cholesterol (58%), and many patients did not have the recommended yearly eye (37%) or foot (45%) examinations. People without health insurance were less likely than those with health insurance to have eye and foot examinations and to have adequate blood sugar control.

What were the limitations of the study?

The study used information from 1988–1995 and may not accurately reflect the quality of diabetes care in more recent years.

What are the implications of the study?

There is much room for improvement in the general care of Americans with diabetes. In addition, lack of health insurance puts diabetic patients at increased risk for poor care. Efforts to improve diabetes care can be measured against this study to judge successes. In addition, it will be valuable to check the general quality of diabetes care in the United States every few years with a national report card like the one used in this study.

Figures

Tables

References

Letters

NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).

Comments

Submit a Comment
Submit a Comment

Summary for Patients

Clinical Slide Sets

Terms of Use

The In the Clinic® slide sets are owned and copyrighted by the American College of Physicians (ACP). All text, graphics, trademarks, and other intellectual property incorporated into the slide sets remain the sole and exclusive property of the ACP. The slide sets may be used only by the person who downloads or purchases them and only for the purpose of presenting them during not-for-profit educational activities. Users may incorporate the entire slide set or selected individual slides into their own teaching presentations but may not alter the content of the slides in any way or remove the ACP copyright notice. Users may make print copies for use as hand-outs for the audience the user is personally addressing but may not otherwise reproduce or distribute the slides by any means or media, including but not limited to sending them as e-mail attachments, posting them on Internet or Intranet sites, publishing them in meeting proceedings, or making them available for sale or distribution in any unauthorized form, without the express written permission of the ACP. Unauthorized use of the In the Clinic slide sets will constitute copyright infringement.

Toolkit

Want to Subscribe?

Learn more about subscription options

Advertisement
Related Articles
Related Point of Care
Topic Collections
PubMed Articles
Forgot your password?
Enter your username and email address. We'll send you a reminder to the email address on record.
(Required)
(Required)