0
Summaries for Patients |

Identifying People at High Risk for Type 2 Diabetes FREE

[+] Article and Author Information

The summary below is from the full report titled “Identification of Persons at High Risk for Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Do We Need the Oral Glucose Tolerance Test?” It is in the 16 April 2002 issue of Annals of Internal Medicine (volume 136, pages 575-581). The authors are MP Stern, K Williams, and SM Haffner.


Ann Intern Med. 2002;136(8):I29. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-136-8-200204160-00002
Text Size: A A A

What is the problem and what is known about it so far?

Type 2 diabetes mellitus, also known as adult-onset diabetes, is a common disease that interferes with the body's ability to use sugar, resulting in high levels in the blood. Over time, high blood sugar levels can lead to complications such as blindness, kidney failure, and heart disease. Diet, exercise, or medications can prevent people who are at high risk for type 2 diabetes from developing the disease. The standard way of identifying people at risk for type 2 diabetes is to measure blood sugar levels 2 hours after a standard amount of sugar is consumed. This test is called an oral glucose tolerance test, and it is inconvenient and costly. Easier and less costly ways of identifying people who might benefit from strategies to prevent diabetes would be useful.

Why did the researchers do this particular study?

To see whether a mathematical model that uses readily available medical information can predict who is likely to develop diabetes as accurately as an oral glucose tolerance test does.

Who was studied?

1791 Mexican Americans and 1112 non-Hispanic white people who did not have diabetes when they were enrolled in the study.

How was the study done?

The researchers collected information about each patient's medical history, blood pressure, body size, cholesterol levels, and sugar levels (during fasting and during an oral glucose tolerance test). They followed the participants to see who developed diabetes over the next 7.5 years. Then, the researchers developed three mathematical models. The first model used only oral glucose tolerance test results. The second model used only the other medical information (clinical model). The third model used both the oral glucose tolerance test results and the medical information.

What did the researchers find?

The model that used only the medical information was much better at predicting who would develop diabetes than the model that used only the oral glucose tolerance results. Adding the oral glucose tolerance test results to the clinical model improved prediction only slightly.

What were the limitations of the study?

This study included many Mexican Americans, who have a higher risk for type 2 diabetes than many other ethnic groups. Before such a model could be used widely, similar results would need to be demonstrated in more diverse sets of people. In addition, the mathematical models would need to be translated for use on doctors' own computers.

What are the implications of the study?

A mathematical model that uses readily available medical information may prove to be a good way to identify patients at risk for type 2 diabetes while avoiding the cost and inconvenience of oral glucose tolerance tests.

Figures

Tables

References

Letters

NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).

Comments

Submit a Comment
Submit a Comment

Summary for Patients

Clinical Slide Sets

Terms of Use

The In the Clinic® slide sets are owned and copyrighted by the American College of Physicians (ACP). All text, graphics, trademarks, and other intellectual property incorporated into the slide sets remain the sole and exclusive property of the ACP. The slide sets may be used only by the person who downloads or purchases them and only for the purpose of presenting them during not-for-profit educational activities. Users may incorporate the entire slide set or selected individual slides into their own teaching presentations but may not alter the content of the slides in any way or remove the ACP copyright notice. Users may make print copies for use as hand-outs for the audience the user is personally addressing but may not otherwise reproduce or distribute the slides by any means or media, including but not limited to sending them as e-mail attachments, posting them on Internet or Intranet sites, publishing them in meeting proceedings, or making them available for sale or distribution in any unauthorized form, without the express written permission of the ACP. Unauthorized use of the In the Clinic slide sets will constitute copyright infringement.

Toolkit

Want to Subscribe?

Learn more about subscription options

Advertisement
Related Articles
Related Point of Care
Topic Collections
PubMed Articles

Want to Subscribe?

Learn more about subscription options

Forgot your password?
Enter your username and email address. We'll send you a reminder to the email address on record.
(Required)
(Required)