0
Sign In  | Subscribe
21 May 2002, Vol 136, No. 10>
Summaries for Patients | 21 May 2002

Clinical Factors Explain Differences in Frequency of Cardiac Procedures between Men and Women after Cardiac Catheterization FREE

[+] Article and Author Information

The summary below is from the full report titled “Sex Differences in Access to Coronary Revascularization after Cardiac Catheterization: Importance of Detailed Clinical Data.” It is in the 21 May 2002 issue of Annals of Internal Medicine (volume 136, pages 723-732). The authors are WA Ghali, PD Faris, PD Galbraith, CM Norris, MJ Curtis, LD Saunders, V Dzavik, LB Mitchell, and ML Knudtson, for the Alberta Provincial Project for Outcome Assessment in Coronary Heart Disease (APPROACH) Investigators.


Ann Intern Med. 2002;136(10):I40-. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-136-10-200205210-00002
Text Size: A A A

What is the problem and what is known about it so far?

Studies have shown that men get more tests and treatments for heart disease than do women. Possible explanations for these differences are that men may have more severe disease than women or that prejudice may lead doctors to offer more tests and treatments to men than to women. Cardiac catheterization is a test in which doctors inject dye into a patient's circulatory system to look for blockages in heart blood vessels and for poor heart function. Options for treating patients with blocked heart blood vessels include medication or revascularization procedures to open the vessels or bypass the blockages. Previous studies have not had enough information to determine whether differences between the sexes in the severity of heart disease explain the observed discrepancy in procedure rates between men and women.

Why did the researchers do this particular study?

To compare the frequency of revascularization procedures in men and women who had equally severe heart disease.

Who was studied?

21,816 patients who had cardiac catheterization in Alberta, Canada, during 1995 to 1998.

How was the study done?

The researchers collected information on the numbers of revascularization procedures done in the year after cardiac catheterization. Then, they compared the frequency with which this procedure was performed in men versus women. The researchers did this by using three different levels of statistical adjustment to equalize factors that might influence the decision to offer treatment. First, they did not account for any patient factors. Next, they accounted for general factors, such as age and previous heart disease. Finally, they accounted for the severity of disease seen on catheterization.

What did the researchers find?

Before patient factors were considered, women appeared much less likely than men to get revascularization procedures. Adjustment for general factors did not change this result. However, when the researchers accounted for the severity of heart disease, they found that men and women with similar severity of heart disease received procedures with similar frequency.

What were the limitations of the study?

These results may not apply to men and women in other geographic areas. Moreover, this study included only patients who had cardiac catheterization, so it does not tell us whether men and women who present with similar symptoms get cardiac catheterization at different rates.

What are the implications of the study?

After cardiac catheterization, men get revascularization procedures more often than women do; however, this difference apparently is explained by more severe heart disease in men rather than by bias of doctors against women. Studies comparing the use of cardiac procedures in different groups should adjust for severity of disease.

Figures

Tables

References

Letters

NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s “Cited By” API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).
Compression-Only CPR: Pushing the Science Forward
Cone
AAM 2010;304:1493-1495.
All you need to read in the other general jounals
BMJ 2010;341:c5893-c1494.

Comments

Submit a Comment
Submit a Comment

Summary for Patients

Clinical Slide Sets

Terms of Use

The In the Clinic® slide sets are owned and copyrighted by the American College of Physicians (ACP). All text, graphics, trademarks, and other intellectual property incorporated into the slide sets remain the sole and exclusive property of the ACP. The slide sets may be used only by the person who downloads or purchases them and only for the purpose of presenting them during not-for-profit educational activities. Users may incorporate the entire slide set or selected individual slides into their own teaching presentations but may not alter the content of the slides in any way or remove the ACP copyright notice. Users may make print copies for use as hand-outs for the audience the user is personally addressing but may not otherwise reproduce or distribute the slides by any means or media, including but not limited to sending them as e-mail attachments, posting them on Internet or Intranet sites, publishing them in meeting proceedings, or making them available for sale or distribution in any unauthorized form, without the express written permission of the ACP. Unauthorized use of the In the Clinic slide sets will constitute copyright infringement.

Toolkit

Want to Subscribe?

Learn more about subscription options

Register Now for a free account
Advertisement

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

In the Clinic
Urinary Tract Infection
Ann Intern Med. 2012;156(5):ITC3-1.
The Polycystic Ovary Syndrome
Ann Intern Med. 2011;154(3):ITC2-1.
Breast Cancer Screening and Prevention
Ann Intern Med. 2010;152(7):ITC4-1.
Menopause
Ann Intern Med. 2009;150(7):ITC4-1.
Topic Collections
PubMed Articles
Comparison of variables in men versus women undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation for severe aortic stenosis (from Italian Multicenter CoreValve registry).
The American journal of cardiology Issue date: 2013 Jan 1
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation in very high-risk patients with EuroSCORE of more than 40%.
The Annals of thoracic surgery Issue date: 2013 Jan

Annals of Internal Medicine

Other Resources

Copyright © 2013 The American College of Physicians. All Rights Reserved.
Print ISSN: 0003-4819 | Online ISSN: 1539-3704

Want to Subscribe?

Learn more about subscription options

Register Now for a free account
Forgot your password?
Enter your username and email address. We'll send you a reminder to the email address on record.
(Required)
(Required)