0
Sign In  | Subscribe
18 June 2002, Vol 136, No. 12>
Summaries for Patients | 18 June 2002

Duplex Ultrasonography for Diagnosis of Blood Clots in the Arms and Shoulders FREE

[+] Article and Author Information

The summary below is from the full report titled “Prospective Study of Color Duplex Ultrasonography Compared with Contrast Venography in Patients Suspected of Having Deep Venous Thrombosis of the Upper Extremities.” It is in the 18 June 2002 issue of Annals of Internal Medicine (volume 136, pages 865-872). The authors are H-J Baarslag, EJR van Beek, MMW Koopman, and JA Reekers.


Ann Intern Med. 2002;136(12):I-30. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-136-12-200206180-00002
Text Size: A A A

What is the problem and what is known about it so far?

Sometimes adults get blood clots in their veins, a condition known as deep venous thrombosis (DVT). The blood clots usually form in leg veins, but they can occur in the veins of the arms and shoulders, particularly in people who have cancer and a central venous catheter (a tube inserted through the skin into a vein near the heart to deliver drugs such as those used in chemotherapy). Blood clots in the deep veins are dangerous because they can break free and travel to the lungs. This problem, called pulmonary embolism (clot in the lung), can be fatal. It is important to diagnose DVT because special blood-thinning drugs reduce the risk that a clot will travel to the lungs.

Venography is the standard test for diagnosing DVT. Venograms are x-rays that are taken after injection of a liquid dye into a vein. They can be harmful. Duplex ultrasonography scans are a safer way to diagnose DVT. These scans use short pulses of sound waves transmitted from a device placed on the surface of the skin to look at blood flow in the veins. We know that ultrasonography can find clots in the legs, but we don't know how it compares with venography in finding clots in the arms and shoulders (upper extremity DVT).

Why did the researchers do this particular study?

To compare duplex ultrasonography with venography for diagnosis of upper-extremity DVT.

Who was studied?

126 adults with suspected upper extremity DVT.

How was the study done?

Ultrasonography scans were done first. A second doctor who did not know the result of the scans then performed venography. Results of the scans were compared with results of venography.

What did the researchers find?

Twenty-three patients (18%) did not have venography because of medical or technical reasons, because of logistic reasons, or because they decided not to. Three patients had scans that the doctors could not interpret as positive or negative. Scans found 36 of 44 clots (82%) that were found by venography. Scans found no clots in 45 of 55 people (82%) who did not have clots on venography.

What were the limitations of the study?

Venography is not 100% accurate in detecting clots. Although it is the most accurate test for diagnosing DVT, it is not a perfect comparison standard.

What are the implications of the study?

Duplex ultrasonography scans are feasible, reasonably accurate tests for diagnosing upper extremity DVT.

Figures

Tables

References

Letters

NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s “Cited By” API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).
Compression-Only CPR: Pushing the Science Forward
Cone
AAM 2010;304:1493-1495.
All you need to read in the other general jounals
BMJ 2010;341:c5893-c1494.

Comments

Submit a Comment
Submit a Comment

Summary for Patients

Clinical Slide Sets

Terms of Use

The In the Clinic® slide sets are owned and copyrighted by the American College of Physicians (ACP). All text, graphics, trademarks, and other intellectual property incorporated into the slide sets remain the sole and exclusive property of the ACP. The slide sets may be used only by the person who downloads or purchases them and only for the purpose of presenting them during not-for-profit educational activities. Users may incorporate the entire slide set or selected individual slides into their own teaching presentations but may not alter the content of the slides in any way or remove the ACP copyright notice. Users may make print copies for use as hand-outs for the audience the user is personally addressing but may not otherwise reproduce or distribute the slides by any means or media, including but not limited to sending them as e-mail attachments, posting them on Internet or Intranet sites, publishing them in meeting proceedings, or making them available for sale or distribution in any unauthorized form, without the express written permission of the ACP. Unauthorized use of the In the Clinic slide sets will constitute copyright infringement.

Toolkit

Want to Subscribe?

Learn more about subscription options

Register Now for a free account
Advertisement

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Topic Collections

Annals of Internal Medicine

Other Resources

Copyright © 2013 The American College of Physicians. All Rights Reserved.
Print ISSN: 0003-4819 | Online ISSN: 1539-3704

Want to Subscribe?

Learn more about subscription options

Register Now for a free account
Forgot your password?
Enter your username and email address. We'll send you a reminder to the email address on record.
(Required)
(Required)