0

The full content of Annals is available to subscribers

Subscribe/Learn More  >
Editorials |

Reflections on Medical Journals: Has Progress Made Them Better?

Jerome P. Kassirer, MD
[+] Article and Author Information

Tufts University School of Medicine; Boston, MA 02111 Yale University School of Medicine; New Haven, CT 06520


Requests for Single Reprints: Jerome P. Kassirer, MD, 21 Squirrel Road, Wellesley, MA 02481.


Ann Intern Med. 2002;137(1):46-48. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-137-1-200207020-00011
Text Size: A A A

Thanks to the request by the Annals editor to comment on the evolution of medical journals during the past quarter century, I had the pleasure of scanning the 1977 issues of several major journals. In those ancient and primordial days of medical science, case reports, observational studies of a few dozen patients, and physiologic experiments ruled the journals' pages. Few of us would have predicted then that molecular medicine, enormous controlled trials, and meta-analyses of dozens of clinical trials would largely replace them in the years to come. Needless to say, advances in science in the intervening years have revolutionized our diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic capabilities, yet many vexing issues documented in these journals in 1977, such as cost containment, medical work force, the quality of care, the ethics of clinical trials, the value of mammography, and the physician as patient advocate, still grace the pages of today's journals. Some of these issues are more vexing than ever. There is little doubt that progress, though stunning in scientific achievements, has been spotty and uneven in health care ethics, financing, and delivery.

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview

Figures

Tables

References

Letters

NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).

Comments

Submit a Comment
Submit a Comment

Summary for Patients

Clinical Slide Sets

Terms of Use

The In the Clinic® slide sets are owned and copyrighted by the American College of Physicians (ACP). All text, graphics, trademarks, and other intellectual property incorporated into the slide sets remain the sole and exclusive property of the ACP. The slide sets may be used only by the person who downloads or purchases them and only for the purpose of presenting them during not-for-profit educational activities. Users may incorporate the entire slide set or selected individual slides into their own teaching presentations but may not alter the content of the slides in any way or remove the ACP copyright notice. Users may make print copies for use as hand-outs for the audience the user is personally addressing but may not otherwise reproduce or distribute the slides by any means or media, including but not limited to sending them as e-mail attachments, posting them on Internet or Intranet sites, publishing them in meeting proceedings, or making them available for sale or distribution in any unauthorized form, without the express written permission of the ACP. Unauthorized use of the In the Clinic slide sets will constitute copyright infringement.

Toolkit

Buy Now

to gain full access to the content and tools.

Want to Subscribe?

Learn more about subscription options

Advertisement
Related Articles
Topic Collections
Forgot your password?
Enter your username and email address. We'll send you a reminder to the email address on record.
(Required)
(Required)