0

The full content of Annals is available to subscribers

Subscribe/Learn More  >
Articles |

Next-Day Care for Emergency Department Users with Nonacute Conditions: A Randomized, Controlled Trial

Donna L. Washington, MD, MPH; Carl D. Stevens, MD, MPH; Paul G. Shekelle, MD, PhD; Philip L. Henneman, MD; and Robert H. Brook, MD, ScD
[+] Article and Author Information

From Veterans Affairs Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System and University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California; Harbor–UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, California; and RAND Health, Santa Monica, California; Baystate Medical Center, Springfield, Massachusetts, and Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts.


Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation.

Acknowledgments: The authors thank the emergency department nurses at Harbor–UCLA Medical Center for their assistance throughout the study. They also thank Martin Lee, PhD, for assistance with statistical analysis and Rachel Louie for programming support.

Grant Support: By the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (no. 030807). Dr. Washington was a Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Minority Medical Faculty Development Program fellow at the time of the study and is currently a Research Associate of the Veterans Affairs Health Services Research and Development Service. Dr. Shekelle was a Senior Research Associate of the Veterans Affairs Health Services Research and Development Service.

Potential Financial Conflicts of Interest: None disclosed.

Requests for Single Reprints: Donna L. Washington, MD, MPH, Veterans Affairs Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, 11301 Wilshire Boulevard, 111G, Los Angeles, CA 90073; e-mail, donna.washington@med.va.gov.

Current Author Addresses: Drs. Washington and Shekelle: Veterans Affairs Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, 11301 Wilshire Boulevard, 111G, Los Angeles, CA 90073.

Dr. Stevens: Department of Emergency Medicine, Harbor–UCLA Medical Center, 1000 West Carson Street, Torrance, CA 90502.

Dr. Henneman: Department of Emergency Medicine, Baystate Medical Center, 759 Chestnut Street, Springfield, MA 01199.

Dr. Brook: RAND Health, 1700 Main Street, Santa Monica, CA 90407.

Author Contributions: Conception and design: D.L. Washington, C.D. Stevens, P.L. Henneman, R.H. Brook.

Analysis and interpretation of the data: D.L. Washington, C.D. Stevens, P.G. Shekelle, P.L. Henneman, R.H. Brook.

Drafting of the article: D.L. Washington, P.G. Shekelle.

Critical revision of the article for important intellectual content: D.L. Washington, C.D. Stevens, P.G. Shekelle, P.L. Henneman, R.H. Brook.

Final approval of the article: D.L. Washington, C.D. Stevens, P.G. Shekelle, P.L. Henneman, R.H. Brook.

Provision of study materials or patients: D.L. Washington, P.L. Henneman.

Statistical expertise: D.L. Washington, P.G. Shekelle.

Obtaining of funding: D.L. Washington.

Administrative, technical, or logistic support: D.L. Washington, C.D. Stevens, P.G. Shekelle, P.L. Henneman, R.H. Brook.

Collection and assembly of data: D.L. Washington.


Ann Intern Med. 2002;137(9):707-714. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-137-9-200211050-00005
Text Size: A A A

We used explicit clinical criteria to identify persons using public hospital emergency departments who were at low risk for adverse outcomes from deferred care. Our study is one of relatively few that evaluates the safety of explicit deferred care guidelines, and it is one of the first to use a randomized, controlled design. Our finding that 36% of screened patients met deferred care guidelines was consistent with published estimates that 40% to 55% of all emergency department visits are for nonemergency conditions (1, 20, 25). Published studies also show, however, that identifying such conditions is difficult, and incorrect triage rates of up to 5.5% have been noted (26). For patients in our study, deferred care was not associated with clinically important deficits in health status or access to care. Implicit criteria used by triage nurses to classify patients vary from hospital to hospital, shift to shift, and even nurse to nurse (26). In contrast, studies of computerized triage algorithms in military settings found an incorrect triage rate of 1.2% when algorithms were used by non–health care personnel (12). Our study used explicit standardized algorithms administered by experienced emergency department nurses.

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 1.
Sore throat data form.Jt Comm J Qual Improve.

© Washington DL, Shekelle PG, Stevens CD: “Does this patient need to be evaluated today? Designing a guideline-driven triage process to determine the timing of care for adults with respiratory infection symptoms.” 2000;26:87-100. Reprinted with permission. BP = blood pressure; DBP = diastolic blood pressure; SBP = systolic blood pressure.

Grahic Jump Location
Grahic Jump Location
Figure 2.
Flow of patients in the trial.

*Only patients with chief symptoms for which deferred care criteria exist were screened. †Patients were excluded if they were younger than 18 years of age, were taken immediately to the emergency department treatment area, were women in active labor, did not speak English or Spanish, were participating in another active study, had no access to a telephone or pager for follow-up, declined to give informed consent, or required more detailed evaluation. RN = registered nurse.

Grahic Jump Location

Tables

References

Letters

NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).

Comments

Submit a Comment
Submit a Comment

Summary for Patients

Deferring Emergency Room Care

The summary below is from the full report titled “Next-Day Care for Emergency Department Users with Nonacute Conditions. A Randomized, Controlled Trial.” It is in the 5 November 2002 issue of Annals of Internal Medicine (volume 137, pages 707-714). The authors are DL Washington, CD Stevens, PG Shekelle, PL Henneman, and RH Brook.

Read More...

Clinical Slide Sets

Terms of Use

The In the Clinic® slide sets are owned and copyrighted by the American College of Physicians (ACP). All text, graphics, trademarks, and other intellectual property incorporated into the slide sets remain the sole and exclusive property of the ACP. The slide sets may be used only by the person who downloads or purchases them and only for the purpose of presenting them during not-for-profit educational activities. Users may incorporate the entire slide set or selected individual slides into their own teaching presentations but may not alter the content of the slides in any way or remove the ACP copyright notice. Users may make print copies for use as hand-outs for the audience the user is personally addressing but may not otherwise reproduce or distribute the slides by any means or media, including but not limited to sending them as e-mail attachments, posting them on Internet or Intranet sites, publishing them in meeting proceedings, or making them available for sale or distribution in any unauthorized form, without the express written permission of the ACP. Unauthorized use of the In the Clinic slide sets will constitute copyright infringement.

Toolkit

Buy Now

to gain full access to the content and tools.

Want to Subscribe?

Learn more about subscription options

Advertisement
Related Articles
Topic Collections
PubMed Articles
Forgot your password?
Enter your username and email address. We'll send you a reminder to the email address on record.
(Required)
(Required)