0

The full content of Annals is available to subscribers

Subscribe/Learn More  >
Editorials |

Deferred Care for Patients in the Emergency Department

Eric B. Larson, MD, MPH
[+] Article and Author Information

Requests for Single Reprints: Eric B. Larson, MD, MPH, Group Health Cooperative Center for Health Studies, 1730 Minor Avenue, Suite 1600, Seattle, WA 98101-1448; e-mail, ebl@u.washington.edu.


Ann Intern Med. 2002;137(9):764-765. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-137-9-200211050-00012
Text Size: A A A

Many areas of the United States are characterized by widespread crowding of emergency departments. In this issue, Washington and colleagues (1) describe a randomized, controlled trial of a system designed to identify persons who have symptoms related to abdominal and pelvic pain, musculoskeletal pain, or respiratory infection and meet criteria for deferred care. After screening by an experienced emergency department nurse, patients who met criteria for deferred care received, at random, either traditional same-day care through the emergency department or an appointment at a primary care clinic at the study site the following day. Not surprisingly, the wait time was approximately twice as long for persons who consented to participate in the study than for nonparticipants. Overall, at 1-week follow-up, the patients in the deferred care group did not seem to suffer any clinically important disadvantages. Nonetheless, the trend in self-reported improvement, bed days, and disability favored the patients receiving traditional care. Washington and colleagues correctly observe that an explicit deferred care strategy, if the safety of such an approach is validated, would be safer than the current system, in which triage by waiting time sometimes results in seriously ill patients leaving emergency departments without being seen. An effective triage system involving deferred care is probably one of several attractive solutions to the desperate overcrowding and chaos seen in emergency departments in many cities throughout the United States (2).

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview

Figures

Tables

References

Letters

NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).

Comments

Submit a Comment
Submit a Comment

Summary for Patients

Clinical Slide Sets

Terms of Use

The In the Clinic® slide sets are owned and copyrighted by the American College of Physicians (ACP). All text, graphics, trademarks, and other intellectual property incorporated into the slide sets remain the sole and exclusive property of the ACP. The slide sets may be used only by the person who downloads or purchases them and only for the purpose of presenting them during not-for-profit educational activities. Users may incorporate the entire slide set or selected individual slides into their own teaching presentations but may not alter the content of the slides in any way or remove the ACP copyright notice. Users may make print copies for use as hand-outs for the audience the user is personally addressing but may not otherwise reproduce or distribute the slides by any means or media, including but not limited to sending them as e-mail attachments, posting them on Internet or Intranet sites, publishing them in meeting proceedings, or making them available for sale or distribution in any unauthorized form, without the express written permission of the ACP. Unauthorized use of the In the Clinic slide sets will constitute copyright infringement.

Toolkit

Buy Now

to gain full access to the content and tools.

Want to Subscribe?

Learn more about subscription options

Advertisement
Topic Collections
PubMed Articles
Forgot your password?
Enter your username and email address. We'll send you a reminder to the email address on record.
(Required)
(Required)