Summaries for Patients |

Classifying Types of Bacterial Infections FREE

[+] Article, Author, and Disclosure Information

The summary below is from the full report titled “Health Care–Associated Bloodstream Infections in Adults: A Reason To Change the Accepted Definition of Community-Acquired Infections.” It is in the 19 November 2002 issue of Annals of Internal Medicine (volume 137, pages 791-797). The authors are ND Friedman, KS Kaye, JE Stout, SA McGarry, SL Trivette, JP Briggs, W Lamm, C Clark, J MacFarquhar, AL Walton, LB Reller, and DJ Sexton.

Ann Intern Med. 2002;137(10):I-36. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-137-10-200211190-00002
Text Size: A A A

What is the problem and what is known about it so far?

Bacteria entering the blood can cause serious problems called bloodstream infections (bacteremia). In the past, doctors classified bloodstream infections as community-acquired or nosocomial. Community-acquired infections occurred in otherwise relatively healthy outpatients. Nosocomial infections occurred in very sick hospitalized patients. Doctors chose antibiotic drugs on the basis of the two kinds of infections because different types of bacteria typically caused them. In the past decade, sicker patients with complicated illnesses such as cancer and kidney failure requiring dialysis are routinely cared for in outpatient settings. Bacteremia in these sicker outpatients may be more like nosocomial infections than like community-acquired infections.

Why did the researchers do this particular study?

To develop a more useful classification system for bloodstream infections.

Who was studied?

504 adults with symptoms or signs of infection and positive blood cultures.

How was the study done?

The researchers reviewed blood culture reports of hospitalized patients from one academic medical center and two community hospitals in North Carolina. They then reviewed medical records of patients with positive blood cultures to learn about symptoms, signs, and sites of infection and medical conditions and treatments. They placed the patients into one of three groups (community-acquired, health care–associated, and nosocomial) and compared infection and patient characteristics across groups. The nosocomial group first had positive blood cultures at least 48 hours after hospitalization for another problem. The health care–associated group had positive blood cultures at the time of or within 48 hours of hospitalization and had recently needed complicated care (nursing home and dialysis patients, patients recently hospitalized, and patients recently given medicine in a vein [intravenous] at home). The community-acquired group first had positive blood cultures at the time of or within 48 hours of hospitalization but did not fit criteria for a health care–associated infection.

What did the researchers find?

Patients with community-acquired infections less often had cancer than patients in the other groups. The most common source of bloodstream infection differed by group: urinary tract infections in the community-acquired group and tubes inserted in veins to give treatment in the other groups. Two bacteria (Escherichia coli and Streptococcus pneumoniae) frequently caused community-acquired infections. Staphylococcus aureus frequently caused health care–associated and nosocomial infections. Bacteria resistant to antibiotics were infrequent with community-acquired infections. More patients with nosocomial infections (37%) died than patients with health care–associated (29%) and community-acquired (16%) infections.

What were the limitations of the study?

The study was from one area in North Carolina. Patterns of health care and infections may vary in different areas. The definition of health care–associated infection was broad and included patients with different risks for infection.

What are the implications of the study?

Health care–associated bloodstream infections acquired in the outpatient setting are different from community-acquired bloodstream infections in relatively healthy people.





Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).


Submit a Comment/Letter
Submit a Comment/Letter

Summary for Patients

Clinical Slide Sets

Terms of Use

The In the Clinic® slide sets are owned and copyrighted by the American College of Physicians (ACP). All text, graphics, trademarks, and other intellectual property incorporated into the slide sets remain the sole and exclusive property of the ACP. The slide sets may be used only by the person who downloads or purchases them and only for the purpose of presenting them during not-for-profit educational activities. Users may incorporate the entire slide set or selected individual slides into their own teaching presentations but may not alter the content of the slides in any way or remove the ACP copyright notice. Users may make print copies for use as hand-outs for the audience the user is personally addressing but may not otherwise reproduce or distribute the slides by any means or media, including but not limited to sending them as e-mail attachments, posting them on Internet or Intranet sites, publishing them in meeting proceedings, or making them available for sale or distribution in any unauthorized form, without the express written permission of the ACP. Unauthorized use of the In the Clinic slide sets will constitute copyright infringement.


Want to Subscribe?

Learn more about subscription options

Related Articles
Topic Collections
PubMed Articles
Forgot your password?
Enter your username and email address. We'll send you a reminder to the email address on record.