0

The full content of Annals is available to subscribers

Subscribe/Learn More  >
Academia and the Profession |

The STARD Statement for Reporting Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy: Explanation and Elaboration

Patrick M. Bossuyt; Johannes B. Reitsma; David E. Bruns; Constantine A. Gatsonis; Paul P. Glasziou; Les M. Irwig; David Moher; Drummond Rennie; Henrica C.W. de Vet; and Jeroen G. Lijmer
[+] Article and Author Information

From Academic Medical Center and VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Clinical Chemistry, Charlottesville, Virginia; Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island; University of Queensland Medical School, Herston, Australia; University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia; Thomas C. Chalmers Center for Systematic Reviews, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; and Journal of the American Medical Association, Chicago, Illinois.


Note: The STARD statement is available in several journals, including Annals of Internal Medicine, Clinical Chemistry, Radiology, BMJ, The Lancet, American Journal of Clinical Pathology, Clinical Biochemistry, Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, and Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

Requests for Single Reprints: Patrick M. Bossuyt, Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, PO Box 22700, 1100 DE Amsterdam, the Netherlands; e-mail, p.m.bossuyt@amc.uva.nl.

Current Author Addresses: Dr. Bossuyt: Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, PO Box 22700, 1100 DE Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Drs. Reitsma and Lijmer: University of Amsterdam, PO Box 22700, 1100 DE Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Dr. Bruns: Clinical Chemistry, 2101 L Street NW, Suite 202, Washington, DC USA 20037-1558

Dr. Gatsonis: Center for Statistical Sciences, Brown University, Box G-H, Providence, RI 02912.

Dr. Glasziou: Centre for Evidence-Based Practice, School of Population Health, The University of Queensland Medical School, Herston Road, Herston QLD 4006, Australia.

Dr. Irwig: Department of Public Health and Community Medicine, Room 301, Edward Ford Building A27, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.

Mr. Moher: Thomas C. Chalmers Center for Systematic Reviews, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute, Room R2226, 401 Smyth Road, Ottawa, Ontario K1H 8L1, Canada.

Dr. Rennie: Journal of the American Medical Association, 515 N. State Street, Chicago, IL 60610.

Dr. de Vet: Institute for Research in Extramural Medicine, VU University Medical Center, Van der Boechorststraat 7, 1081 BT, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.


Ann Intern Med. 2003;138(1):W1-12. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-138-1-200301070-00012-w1
Text Size: A A A

The quality of reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy is less than optimal. Complete and accurate reporting is necessary to enable readers to assess the potential for bias in the study and to evaluate the generalizability of the results.A group of scientists and editors has developed the STARD (Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy) statement to improve the reporting the quality of reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy. The statement consists of a checklist of 25 items and flow diagram that authors can use to ensure that all relevant information is present.This explanatory document aims to facilitate the use, understanding, and dissemination of the checklist. The document contains a clarification of the meaning, rationale, and optimal use of each item on the checklist, as well as a short summary of the available evidence on bias and applicability.The STARD statement, checklist, flowchart, and this explanation and elaboration document should be useful resources to improve reporting of diagnostic accuracy studies. Complete and informative reporting can only lead to better decisions in health care.

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 1.
Example of a flow diagram of a diagnostic accuracy study(55)

.

Grahic Jump Location
Grahic Jump Location
Figure 2.
Distribution on a log scale of the test results according to anti-CCP units for the different groups of patients.
Grahic Jump Location

Tables

References

Letters

NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).

Comments

Submit a Comment
Submit a Comment

Summary for Patients

Clinical Slide Sets

Terms of Use

The In the Clinic® slide sets are owned and copyrighted by the American College of Physicians (ACP). All text, graphics, trademarks, and other intellectual property incorporated into the slide sets remain the sole and exclusive property of the ACP. The slide sets may be used only by the person who downloads or purchases them and only for the purpose of presenting them during not-for-profit educational activities. Users may incorporate the entire slide set or selected individual slides into their own teaching presentations but may not alter the content of the slides in any way or remove the ACP copyright notice. Users may make print copies for use as hand-outs for the audience the user is personally addressing but may not otherwise reproduce or distribute the slides by any means or media, including but not limited to sending them as e-mail attachments, posting them on Internet or Intranet sites, publishing them in meeting proceedings, or making them available for sale or distribution in any unauthorized form, without the express written permission of the ACP. Unauthorized use of the In the Clinic slide sets will constitute copyright infringement.

Toolkit

Buy Now

to gain full access to the content and tools.

Want to Subscribe?

Learn more about subscription options

Advertisement
Related Articles
Topic Collections
PubMed Articles
Forgot your password?
Enter your username and email address. We'll send you a reminder to the email address on record.
(Required)
(Required)