0
Sign In  | Subscribe
21 October 2003, Vol 139, No. 8>
Summaries for Patients | 21 October 2003

Relationships between the Amount of Colon Cancer Surgery a Hospital Performs and Patient Outcomes FREE

[+] Article and Author Information

The summary below is from the full report titled “Association of Hospital Procedure Volume and Outcomes in Patients with Colon Cancer at High Risk for Recurrence.” It is in the 21 October 2003 issue of Annals of Internal Medicine (volume 139, pages 649-657). The authors are J.A. Meyerhardt, P.J. Catalano, D. Schrag, J.Z. Ayanian, D.G. Haller, R.J. Mayer, J.S. Macdonald, A.B. Benson III, and C.S. Fuchs.


Ann Intern Med. 2003;139(8):I-28. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-139-8-200310210-00003
Text Size: A A A

What is the problem and what is known about it so far?

Colon cancer occurs in the large intestine (colon). Treatment and outcome depend on the cancer stage. Surgery called colon cancer resection usually cures stage I colon cancer. Patients with stage II or III colon cancer need surgery for a chance to be cured, and patients with high-risk stage II cancer or those with stage III cancer also receive cancer-fighting drugs (chemotherapy). Treatment of stage IV cancer rarely leads to a cure, but it may help patients live longer than they would without treatment. How well patients with colon cancer do may depend a lot on the quality of the surgery they receive. Some studies suggest that patients who have colon cancer surgery at hospitals that perform many of these procedures (high-volume hospitals) live longer than patients who have surgery at hospitals that do fewer procedures (low-volume hospitals). However, these studies have looked only at deaths from any cause rather than at deaths specifically from colon cancer or at the frequency with which cancer returns after surgery (recurrence).

Why did the researchers do this particular study?

To see whether patients who have colon cancer surgery at high-volume hospitals have fewer cancer recurrences or deaths specifically due to colon cancer than patients who have surgery at low-volume hospitals.

Who was studied?

3161 patients with high-risk stage II or III colon cancer who were participating in a study of chemotherapy after colon cancer resection.

How was the study done?

The researchers used Medicare data to classify each hospital at which a study patient had surgery as high, medium, or low volume. Next, they compared the percentages of patients at high-, medium-, and low-volume hospitals who were still alive 5 years after surgery, who were living but had colon cancer recurrence, and who had died specifically of colon cancer. All of these comparisons accounted for differences in age and other patient factors that could influence outcomes.

What did the researchers find?

Five years after colon cancer resection, 63.8% of patients at low-volume hospitals and 67.3% of patients at high-volume hospitals were still alive. However, the percentages of patients who had colon cancer recurrence or who had died of colon cancer were not different for patients from high- and low-volume hospitals. The higher death rates of people who had surgery at low-volume hospitals were due to conditions unrelated to colon cancer or to colon cancer surgery.

What were the limitations of the study?

Since all of the patients received chemotherapy as part of a study, this study cannot tell us whether patients cared for at high-volume hospitals get more appropriate overall colon cancer treatment than those at less experienced hospitals.

What are the implications of the study?

Differences in cancer-related outcomes may not explain the shorter survival of patients with colon cancer who have their procedures at hospitals that do few of these procedures compared with patients at hospitals that do many. Patients who have surgery at less experienced hospitals may just be sicker than patients at more experienced hospitals.

Figures

Tables

References

Letters

NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s “Cited By” API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).
Compression-Only CPR: Pushing the Science Forward
Cone
AAM 2010;304:1493-1495.
All you need to read in the other general jounals
BMJ 2010;341:c5893-c1494.

Comments

Submit a Comment
Submit a Comment

Summary for Patients

Clinical Slide Sets

Terms of Use

The In the Clinic® slide sets are owned and copyrighted by the American College of Physicians (ACP). All text, graphics, trademarks, and other intellectual property incorporated into the slide sets remain the sole and exclusive property of the ACP. The slide sets may be used only by the person who downloads or purchases them and only for the purpose of presenting them during not-for-profit educational activities. Users may incorporate the entire slide set or selected individual slides into their own teaching presentations but may not alter the content of the slides in any way or remove the ACP copyright notice. Users may make print copies for use as hand-outs for the audience the user is personally addressing but may not otherwise reproduce or distribute the slides by any means or media, including but not limited to sending them as e-mail attachments, posting them on Internet or Intranet sites, publishing them in meeting proceedings, or making them available for sale or distribution in any unauthorized form, without the express written permission of the ACP. Unauthorized use of the In the Clinic slide sets will constitute copyright infringement.

Toolkit

Buy This Article

to gain full access to the content and tools.

Want to Subscribe?

Learn more about subscription options

Register Now for a free account
Advertisement

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

In the Clinic
Transitions of Care
Ann Intern Med. 2013;158(5_Part_1):ITC3-1.
Community-Acquired Pneumonia
Ann Intern Med. 2009;151(7):ITC4-1.
Colorectal Cancer Screening
Ann Intern Med. 2008;148(3):ITC2-1.
Topic Collections
PubMed Articles
Computed tomographic colonography versus colonoscopy for investigation of patients with symptoms suggestive of colorectal cancer (SIGGAR): a multicentre randomised trial.
Lancet Issue date: 2013 Apr 6
Computed tomographic colonography versus barium enema for diagnosis of colorectal cancer or large polyps in symptomatic patients (SIGGAR): a multicentre randomised trial.
Lancet Issue date: 2013 Apr 6

Annals of Internal Medicine

Other Resources

Copyright © 2013 The American College of Physicians. All Rights Reserved.
Print ISSN: 0003-4819 | Online ISSN: 1539-3704

Buy This Article

to gain full access to the content and tools.

Want to Subscribe?

Learn more about subscription options

Register Now for a free account
Forgot your password?
Enter your username and email address. We'll send you a reminder to the email address on record.
(Required)
(Required)