The full content of Annals is available to subscribers

Subscribe/Learn More  >
Ideas and Opinions |

ALLHAT, or the Soft Science of the Secondary End Point

Franz H. Messerli, MD
[+] Article, Author, and Disclosure Information

From Ochsner Clinic Foundation, New Orleans, Louisiana.

Potential Financial Conflicts of Interest:Honoraria and grant support: Abbott Laboratories, AstraZeneca, Aventis, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Forest Pharmaceuticals, GlaxoSmithKline, Integrium, Knoll Pharmaceuticals, Merck & Co., Novartis, Pfizer, Procter & Gamble, Recordati, Reliant Pharmaceuticals, Roche, Sankyo, Searle, Solvay Pharmaceuticals, Wyeth; Expert testimony: Procter & Gamble.

Current Author Address: Franz H. Messerli, MD, Ochsner Clinic Foundation, 1514 Jefferson Highway, New Orleans, LA 70121; e-mail, fmesserli@aol.com.

Ann Intern Med. 2003;139(9):777-780. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-139-9-200311040-00012
Text Size: A A A

The recent Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT) showed that the primary end point, coronary heart disease, was identical in the chlorthalidone, lisinopril, and amlodipine groups. Yet the major conclusion of this trial was that thiazide diuretics are superior in preventing 1 or more major forms of cardiovascular disease and should be preferred for first-line antihypertensive therapy. This conclusion was based solely on an analysis of secondary end points and cost. As evidenced by the dictum to use thiazides for most patients with uncomplicated hypertension in the Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on the Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure, this interpretation of ALLHAT broadly adumbrated these guidelines. Although diuretics will rightfully remain a cornerstone in antihypertensive therapy, we should remember (as we were told by the ALLHAT investigators) that secondary end points are soft data that should not form a basis for main conclusions or lead to a labeling of a drug class as preferred.





Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).


Submit a Comment/Letter
Submit a Comment/Letter

Summary for Patients

Clinical Slide Sets

Terms of Use

The In the Clinic® slide sets are owned and copyrighted by the American College of Physicians (ACP). All text, graphics, trademarks, and other intellectual property incorporated into the slide sets remain the sole and exclusive property of the ACP. The slide sets may be used only by the person who downloads or purchases them and only for the purpose of presenting them during not-for-profit educational activities. Users may incorporate the entire slide set or selected individual slides into their own teaching presentations but may not alter the content of the slides in any way or remove the ACP copyright notice. Users may make print copies for use as hand-outs for the audience the user is personally addressing but may not otherwise reproduce or distribute the slides by any means or media, including but not limited to sending them as e-mail attachments, posting them on Internet or Intranet sites, publishing them in meeting proceedings, or making them available for sale or distribution in any unauthorized form, without the express written permission of the ACP. Unauthorized use of the In the Clinic slide sets will constitute copyright infringement.


Buy Now for $32.00

to gain full access to the content and tools.

Want to Subscribe?

Learn more about subscription options

Related Articles
Related Point of Care
Topic Collections
PubMed Articles
Forgot your password?
Enter your username and email address. We'll send you a reminder to the email address on record.