0
Summaries for Patients |

Communication in Health Care Visits when Doctors and Patients Have the Same versus Different Ethnic Backgrounds FREE

[+] Article and Author Information

The summary below is from the full report titled “Patient-Centered Communication, Ratings of Care, and Concordance of Patient and Physician Race.” It is in the 2 December 2003 issue of Annals of Internal Medicine (volume 139, pages 907-915). The authors are L.A. Cooper, D.L. Roter, R.L. Johnson, D.E. Ford, D.M. Steinwachs, and N.R. Powe.


Ann Intern Med. 2003;139(11):I-34. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-139-11-200312020-00004
Text Size: A A A

What is the problem and what is known about it so far?

African-American patients who see African-American doctors report more involvement in medical decisions, higher trust, and higher satisfaction with their doctors than African-American patients whose doctors are not African American. A possible explanation for these differences is that doctors and patients communicate most effectively when they are of similar ethnic background. However, previous studies have not examined whether communication patterns differ when doctors and patients are of similar versus different ethnic backgrounds.

Why did the researchers do this particular study?

To compare patient–doctor communication during visits in which both the doctor and patient were African American or white with visits in which the doctor and patient did not share an ethic background.

Who was studied?

252 adults seeing 31 doctors in 16 primary care practices.

How was the study done?

The authors audiotaped each visit and then rated each tape using a standard process that measured whether the communication was more “patient centered” or “doctor centered.” Compared with doctor-centered communication, patient-centered communication involved more opportunities for the patient to talk and to direct the conversation and greater effort to involve the patient in decision making. Before each visit, patients completed a survey that asked about their age, sex, race, education, and health. After each visit, patients completed a survey that asked them to rate whether the doctor encouraged them to participate in decision making, to rate their overall satisfaction, and to say whether they would recommend the doctor to a friend. The researchers then compared communication and satisfaction in 2 groups. The first group included visits in which both the doctor and patient were African American or both were white (race concordant). The second group included visits in which the patient was African American and the doctor was white or vice versa (race discordant).

What did the researchers find?

As in previous studies, this study found that patient ratings of care and of doctors' efforts to get the patient to participate in decisions were higher when both the doctor and patient were African American or both were white than when the doctor and patient had different backgrounds. In addition, visits were about 2 minutes longer and the patient's affect was more positive when the doctor and patient were of the same ethnic background. However, the researchers did not find that race-concordant visits had higher levels of patient-centered communication than race-discordant visits.

What were the limitations of the study?

This study included only African-American and white patients and doctors. The results may not apply to other or more specifically defined ethnic groups. In addition, the study was too small to find small differences in communication patterns.

What are the implications of the study?

Patient-centered communication does not seem to explain the favorable ratings of care for patients who see physicians whose ethnic background is similar to their own. Further research to understand the factors that explain these differences could help improve visits for all patients whether they see doctors with similar or different ethnic backgrounds.

Figures

Tables

References

Letters

NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).

Comments

Submit a Comment
Submit a Comment

Summary for Patients

Clinical Slide Sets

Terms of Use

The In the Clinic® slide sets are owned and copyrighted by the American College of Physicians (ACP). All text, graphics, trademarks, and other intellectual property incorporated into the slide sets remain the sole and exclusive property of the ACP. The slide sets may be used only by the person who downloads or purchases them and only for the purpose of presenting them during not-for-profit educational activities. Users may incorporate the entire slide set or selected individual slides into their own teaching presentations but may not alter the content of the slides in any way or remove the ACP copyright notice. Users may make print copies for use as hand-outs for the audience the user is personally addressing but may not otherwise reproduce or distribute the slides by any means or media, including but not limited to sending them as e-mail attachments, posting them on Internet or Intranet sites, publishing them in meeting proceedings, or making them available for sale or distribution in any unauthorized form, without the express written permission of the ACP. Unauthorized use of the In the Clinic slide sets will constitute copyright infringement.

Toolkit

Want to Subscribe?

Learn more about subscription options

Advertisement
Related Articles
PubMed Articles
Dyschromia in skin of color. J Drugs Dermatol 2014;13(4):401-6.

Want to Subscribe?

Learn more about subscription options

Forgot your password?
Enter your username and email address. We'll send you a reminder to the email address on record.
(Required)
(Required)