6 July 2004, Vol 141, No. 1>

Email

American College of Physicians

You must be logged in as an individual user to share content.

Copyright in the material you requested is held by American College Of Physicians (unless otherwise noted). This email ability is provided as a courtesy, and by using it you agree that that you are requesting the material solely for personal, non-commercial use, and that it is subject to ACP's Conditions of Use. The information provided in order to email this topic will not be used to send unsolicited email, nor will it be furnished to third parties. Please refer to American College Of Physicians's Privacy Policy for further information.

Copyright © American College Of Physicians. All rights reserved.
Share
Get Citation

Low Doses of Steroids Improve Survival in Patients with Septic Shock. Annals of Internal Medicine. 2004 Jul;141(1):I-64.

Download citation file:

RIS (Zotero)

EndNote

BibTex

Medlars

ProCite

RefWorks

Reference Manager

Copyright © 2013 The American College of Physicians. All Rights Reserved.
PDF

Summaries for Patients | 6 July 2004

Low Doses of Steroids Improve Survival in Patients with Septic Shock FREE

The summary below is from the full report titled “Meta-Analysis: The Effect of Steroids on Survival and Shock during Sepsis Depends on the Dose.” It is in the 6 July 2004 issue of Annals of Internal Medicine (volume 141, pages 47-56). The authors are P.C. Minneci, K.J. Deans, S.M. Banks, P.Q. Eichacker, and C. Natanson.

Ann Intern Med. 2004;141(1):I-64. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-141-1-200407060-00006

Text Size: A A A

Article

Comments

What is the problem and what is known about it so far?

Septic shock is a serious, sometimes fatal, condition that occurs when an overwhelming infection leads to low blood pressure and low blood flow. Doctors have tried several treatments for septic shock. From 1960 to 1990, they sometimes gave people with septic shock infusions of high-dose steroids (glucocorticoids) to try to fight inflammation and help increase blood pressure. Some studies suggested that the high doses actually worsened the body's ability to fight infection. Since 1990, doctors sometimes used lower doses of steroids. Whether the lower doses actually benefit patients is not clear.

Why did the researchers do this particular study?

To determine whether steroids given in particular doses improve survival rates of patients with septic shock.

Who was studied?

1717 patients with sepsis and septic shock who had participated in trials that assessed effects of steroids on survival.

How was the study done?

Rather than performing a new study, the researchers reviewed 14 trials. These trials randomly assigned adult patients with sepsis in intensive care units to receive or not receive infusions of steroids. Nine trials were performed between 1960 and 1990 and 5 trials were performed between 1998 and 2002. The researchers assessed doses and timing of steroids used in the trials. They then compared how many patients survived in the 2 groups of studies.

What did the researchers find?

Trials published before 1990 showed that steroids worsened survival of patients with sepsis. Recent trials showed that steroids improved survival. The recent trials gave steroids in lower doses and for longer periods (about a week) than the earlier trials (several hours to days). Older trials more often started steroid therapy within a few hours of diagnosis, while recent trials more often started steroid therapy 1 to 3 days after diagnosis.

What were the limitations of the study?

Patients with septic shock typically receive several treatments. Treatments other than steroids may have varied between older and newer studies.

What are the implications of the study?

Short courses of high-dose steroids harm patients with sepsis, while 5- to 7-day courses of low-dose steroids benefit patients with sepsis.

Figures

Tables

References

Letters

NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s “Cited By” API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).

Compression-Only CPR: Pushing the Science Forward
Cone
AAM 2010;304:1493-1495.

All you need to read in the other general jounals
BMJ 2010;341:c5893-c1494.

Comments

Please read the other comments before posting. Contributors must reveal any conflict of interest.
Comments are moderated and will appear on the site at the discretion of The American College of Physicians editorial staff. Please be sure your email address is updated in your account, otherwise the American College of Physicians will not be able to contact you about your comment.

* = Required Field

Comment Author(s)* (if multiple authors, separate names by comma)

Example: John Doe

Affiliation & Institution*

Disclosure of Any Conflicts of Interest* (applies to the past 5 years and foreseeable future) Indicate any potential conflicts of interest of each author below, including specific financial interests and relationships and affiliations relevant to the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript (eg, employment/affiliation, grants or funding, consultancies, honoraria, speakers bureau, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, royalties, donation of medical equipment, or patents filed, received, or pending). If all authors have none, check "No potential conflicts or relevant financial interests" in the box below. Please also indicate any funding received in support of this work. The information will be posted with your response.

Please disclose any conflicts of interest or check the box below.

No potential conflicts or relevant financial interests

Comment Title*

Comment*

Get Audio Code

Submit Cancel

Submit a Comment

Summary for Patients

Clinical Slide Sets

Terms of Use

The In the Clinic® slide sets are owned and copyrighted by the American College of Physicians (ACP). All text, graphics, trademarks, and other intellectual property incorporated into the slide sets remain the sole and exclusive property of the ACP. The slide sets may be used only by the person who downloads or purchases them and only for the purpose of presenting them during not-for-profit educational activities. Users may incorporate the entire slide set or selected individual slides into their own teaching presentations but may not alter the content of the slides in any way or remove the ACP copyright notice. Users may make print copies for use as hand-outs for the audience the user is personally addressing but may not otherwise reproduce or distribute the slides by any means or media, including but not limited to sending them as e-mail attachments, posting them on Internet or Intranet sites, publishing them in meeting proceedings, or making them available for sale or distribution in any unauthorized form, without the express written permission of the ACP. Unauthorized use of the In the Clinic slide sets will constitute copyright infringement.

Toolkit

Sign In

Forgot Your Password?

Buy This Article

to gain full access to the content and tools.

Want to Subscribe?

Learn more about subscription options

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Articles

Epidural Steroids, Etanercept, or Saline in Subacute Sciatica: A Multicenter, Randomized Trial

Ann Intern Med. 2012;156(8):551-559.

Treatment of Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyposis With Oral Steroids Followed by Topical Steroids: A Randomized Trial

Ann Intern Med. 2011;154(5):293-302.

Initial Treatment With Oral Steroids for Chronic Sinusitis Accompanied by Nasal Polyps

Ann Intern Med. 2011;154(5):I-34.

[+] View More

In the Clinic

Allergic Rhinitis

Ann Intern Med. 2007;146(7):ITC4-1.

[+] View More

Journal Club

Drotrecogin alfa (activated) did not reduce mortality at 28 or 90 days in patients with septic shock

Ann Intern Med. 2012;157(4):JC2-11.

Review: Steroids, US, electromagnetic field therapy, and nocturnal splinting have moderate, short-term effectiveness for the carpal tunnel syndrome

Ann Intern Med. 2010;153(12):JC6-10.

Adding steroid injection to exercise and manual mobilization did not reduce shoulder pain and disability over the long term

Ann Intern Med. 2010;153(10):JC5-6.

Intensive insulin therapy did not reduce mortality more than conventional therapy in septic shock treated with corticosteroids

Ann Intern Med. 2010;152(10):JC5-5.

Review: Adding antiviral drugs to steroids did not improve facial muscle recovery in Bell palsy

Ann Intern Med. 2010;152(4):JC2-10.

[+] View More

Topic Collections

PubMed Articles

A Survey of Stated Physician Practices and Beliefs on the Use of Steroids in Pediatric Fluid and/or Vasoactive Infusion-Dependent Shock.

Pediatric critical care medicine : a journal of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies Issue date: 2013 Apr 26

Successful Treatment of Acquired Hemophilia A With Rituximab and Steroids in a 5-Year-Old Girl.

Journal of pediatric hematology/oncology Issue date: 2013 Apr 11

Results provided by: