0
Summaries for Patients |

Altering Test-Ordering Behavior of Hospital Staff FREE

[+] Article and Author Information

The summary below is from the full report titled “The Impact of Peer Management on Test-Ordering Behavior.” It is in the 3 August 2004 issue of Annals of Internal Medicine (volume 141, pages 196-204). The authors are E.G. Neilson, K.B. Johnson, S.T. Rosenbloom, W.D. Dupont, D. Talbert, D.A. Giuse, A. Kaiser, and R.A. Miller, for the Resource Utilization Committee.


Ann Intern Med. 2004;141(3):I-57. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-141-3-200408030-00004
Text Size: A A A

What is the problem and what is known about it so far?

Several studies show that hospital staff often order too many laboratory and x-ray tests. The excessive test ordering adds unnecessary costs and sometimes results in false-positive findings. Researchers and managers have tried to change the test-ordering behavior of health care providers, but it is not easy. Providers are increasingly using computer-based systems to automate orders for tests, medications, and referrals. These systems are called care provider/computerized physician order entry (CPOE), and it ensures legible, standardized orders. It can be linked with software that provides staff with important information about tests or drugs, such as abnormal values, costs, and drug interactions. It may also include reminders or alerts to help assure that orders are appropriate on the basis of previous orders, medications, and patients' diagnoses. Given these features, hospitals are beginning to test ways of using CPOE to improve provider test-ordering behavior.

Why did the researchers do this particular study?

To see whether peer suggestions about limiting routine computerized orders can help hospital staff reduce unnecessary testing.

Who was studied?

Hospital staff at an academic medical center.

How was the study done?

The medical center formed a committee of peer leaders to study test orders for hospitalized patients. The committee reviewed past files from the medical center's care CPOE system to help identify patterns of excessive test ordering. The committee then chose and tested 2 different ways of using their CPOE system to reduce unnecessary test ordering. First, they targeted tests that were ordered repetitively in an open-ended manner beyond 3 days, such as “daily blood tests or x-rays.” They included a daily pop-up prompt that listed such tests and asked staff whether they wanted to discontinue any of the orders. Second, they changed the ways that tests could be ordered. They modified the CPOE software so that staff couldn't repetitively order tests in an open-ended manner. They also unbundled panels of blood tests that previously had been grouped as 1 order so that staff had to order each test separately. The software also showed staff graphs of past test results. The researchers then compared the numbers of tests ordered before and after the 2 interventions.

What did the researchers find?

Computer prompts that questioned repetitive orders reduced the numbers of routine blood test and heart tracing (electrocardiograms) orders but not chest x-ray orders. Stopping open-ended repetitive orders and unbundling tests reduced the numbers of chest x-ray and blood test orders. Patient readmission rates, lengths of stay, transfers to intensive care units, and mortality rates remained stable despite reduced testing.

What were the limitations of the study?

The study involved only 1 academic medical center. The study compared numbers of tests ordered before and after interventions. Other events or changes in the hospital occurring during the time of the interventions could have affected the staff's test-ordering behavior.

What are the implications of the study?

Peer-designed interventions using CPOE systems can improve the test-ordering behavior of hospital staff.

Figures

Tables

References

Letters

NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).

Comments

Submit a Comment
Submit a Comment

Summary for Patients

Clinical Slide Sets

Terms of Use

The In the Clinic® slide sets are owned and copyrighted by the American College of Physicians (ACP). All text, graphics, trademarks, and other intellectual property incorporated into the slide sets remain the sole and exclusive property of the ACP. The slide sets may be used only by the person who downloads or purchases them and only for the purpose of presenting them during not-for-profit educational activities. Users may incorporate the entire slide set or selected individual slides into their own teaching presentations but may not alter the content of the slides in any way or remove the ACP copyright notice. Users may make print copies for use as hand-outs for the audience the user is personally addressing but may not otherwise reproduce or distribute the slides by any means or media, including but not limited to sending them as e-mail attachments, posting them on Internet or Intranet sites, publishing them in meeting proceedings, or making them available for sale or distribution in any unauthorized form, without the express written permission of the ACP. Unauthorized use of the In the Clinic slide sets will constitute copyright infringement.

Toolkit

Want to Subscribe?

Learn more about subscription options

Advertisement
Related Articles
Topic Collections
PubMed Articles

Want to Subscribe?

Learn more about subscription options

Forgot your password?
Enter your username and email address. We'll send you a reminder to the email address on record.
(Required)
(Required)