0

The full content of Annals is available to subscribers

Subscribe/Learn More  >
Letters |

Dexamethasone and Pneumococcal Meningitis

Diederik van de Beek, MD, PhD; and Jan de Gans, PhD
[+] Article and Author Information

From Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, 1100 DE Amsterdam, the Netherlands.


The Editors welcome submissions for possible publication in the Letters section. Authors of letters should:

•Include no more than 300 words of text, three authors, and five references

•Type with double-spacing

•Send three copies of the letter, an authors' form signed by all authors, and a cover letter describing any conflicts of interest related to the contents of the letter.

Letters commenting on an Annals article will be considered if they are received within 6 weeks of the time the article was published. Only some of the letters received can be published. Published letters are edited and may be shortened; tables and figures are included only selectively. Authors will be notified that the letter has been received. If the letter is selected for publication, the author will be notified about 3 weeks before the publication date. Unpublished letters cannot be returned.

Annals welcomes electronically submitted letters.


Ann Intern Med. 2004;141(4):327. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-141-4-200408170-00028
Text Size: A A A

Figures

Tables

References

Letters

NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).

Comments

Submit a Comment
The Use of Dexamethasone in Bacterial Meningitis
Posted on August 20, 2004
Andre C. Kalil
University of Nebraska Medical Center
Conflict of Interest: None Declared

Drs. van de Beek and de Gans (1) found that ""¦the beneficial effect of dexamethasone on mortality rates in patients with pneumococcal meningitis is attributable to a beneficial effect on systemic complications (i.e. septic shock, respiratory failure, multi-organ dysfunction and cardiac ischemia)". This clinical observation is interesting, particularly in lieu of the growing data on the effects of steroids in septic shock just published in this journal (2), despite the use of different drug regimens (4).

However, both this new clinical observation (1) and the original editorial by Tunkel and Scheld (3) did not address the remaining 64% of the trial population (4) which consisted of patients with "˜N. meningitidis' (n = 97), "˜other bacteria' (n = 29) and "˜negative culture' (n = 67). The statements "Dexamethasone reduces mortality rates in adults with pneumococcal meningitis" (1) and "if the meningitis is found not to be caused by S. pneumoniae, dexamethasone therapy should be discontinued" (3) do not accurately reflect the trial results (4).

The overall results (4) were based on a total of 301 patients with multiple causes of bacterial meningitis, and not on the S. pneumoniae subgroup alone. Following CONSORT guidelines, the Breslow-Day test for interaction yields p-values of 0.20 for "˜death' and 0.37 for "˜unfavorable outcome', indicating no significant effect of S. pneumoniae status on the magnitude of the treatment effect. Thus, the lack of significant interaction does not support the conclusion that the subgroups are heterogeneous nor the recommendation for dexamethasone in pneumococcal meningitis only.

Alternatively, the benefits of steroids in bacterial meningitis may depend on the baseline risk of death, as seen in sepsis trials (5). The larger effect seen in the pneumococcal group, which had higher control mortality (34%), compared to the one seen in the meningococcal group (2%) supports this concept. It would be of interest to analyze the dexamethasone effect based on whether or not septic shock was present at study entry.

Noteworthy, the number of deaths by pneumococcal meningitis in this post hoc study was 18, whereas in the original trial it was 25 (4). This discrepancy appears to be due to the use of different end points. While I understand the choice of a 14-day survival end point, the 8-week end point used in the original trial should also be reported in this subgroup study. In addition, it would be more representative of the original trial and informative to the clinician if the same post hoc analysis was performed on all 301 patients (4).

References:

1. van de Beek D, de Gans J. Dexamethasone and pneumococcal meningitis. Ann Intern Med 2004;141:321.

2. Minneci PC, Deans KJ, Banks SM, Eichacker PQ, Natanson C. Meta- analysis: the effect of steroids on survival and shock during sepsis depends on the dose. Ann Intern Med 2004;141:47-56.

3. Tunkel AR, Scheld WM. Corticosteroids for everyone with meningitis? N Engl J Med 2002;347:1613-14.

4. de Gans J, van de Beek D. Dexamethasone in adults with bactereial meningitis. N Engl J Med 2002;347:1549-56.

5. Eichacker PQ, Parent C, Kalil A, Esposito C, Cui X, Banks SM, et al. Risk and efficacy of antiinflammatory agents: retrospective and confirmatory studies of sepsis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2002;166:1156- 7.

Conflict of Interest:

None declared

Submit a Comment

Summary for Patients

Clinical Slide Sets

Terms of Use

The In the Clinic® slide sets are owned and copyrighted by the American College of Physicians (ACP). All text, graphics, trademarks, and other intellectual property incorporated into the slide sets remain the sole and exclusive property of the ACP. The slide sets may be used only by the person who downloads or purchases them and only for the purpose of presenting them during not-for-profit educational activities. Users may incorporate the entire slide set or selected individual slides into their own teaching presentations but may not alter the content of the slides in any way or remove the ACP copyright notice. Users may make print copies for use as hand-outs for the audience the user is personally addressing but may not otherwise reproduce or distribute the slides by any means or media, including but not limited to sending them as e-mail attachments, posting them on Internet or Intranet sites, publishing them in meeting proceedings, or making them available for sale or distribution in any unauthorized form, without the express written permission of the ACP. Unauthorized use of the In the Clinic slide sets will constitute copyright infringement.

Toolkit

Buy Now

to gain full access to the content and tools.

Want to Subscribe?

Learn more about subscription options

Advertisement
Forgot your password?
Enter your username and email address. We'll send you a reminder to the email address on record.
(Required)
(Required)