0
Sign In  | Subscribe
21 September 2004, Vol 141, No. 6>
Summaries for Patients | 21 September 2004

Improvements in 1-Year Outcomes before and after a Discharge Medication Program for Patients Hospitalized with Heart Disease FREE

[+] Article and Author Information

The summary below is from the full report titled “Improvements in 1-Year Cardiovascular Clinical Outcomes Associated with a Hospital-Based Discharge Medication Program.” It is in the 21 September 2004 issue of Annals of Internal Medicine (volume 141, pages 446-453). The authors are J.M. Lappé, J.B. Muhlestein, D.L. Lappé, R.S. Badger, T.L. Bair, R. Brockman, T.K. French, L.C. Hofmann, B.D. Horne, S. Kralick-Goldberg, N. Nicponski, J.A. Orton, R.R. Pearson, D.G. Renlund, H. Rimmasch, C. Roberts, and J.L. Anderson.


Ann Intern Med. 2004;141(6):I-43. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-141-6-200409210-00005
Text Size: A A A

What is the problem and what is known about it so far?

Research shows that many drugs improve outcomes for patients with heart disease. Unfortunately, many patients with heart disease who could benefit from these drugs do not receive them. In addition, among patients who do receive the drugs, many do not take them the way they should. It is possible that patients are more likely to take drugs and to take them the right way if they get the drug prescription at the end of a hospitalization.

Why did the researchers do this particular study?

To find a way to increase the prescription of appropriate drugs after hospitalization for heart disease. The researchers also wanted to see if there was any relationship between improved prescription at the time of hospital discharge and patients' health after leaving the hospital.

Who was studied?

57,465 patients hospitalized with heart problems in 10 hospitals in Utah and Idaho over 6 years.

How was the study done?

The researchers changed a standard hospital discharge form to remind doctors to think about prescribing certain drugs to patients with heart disease who were being sent home from the hospital. The researchers then compared the numbers of patients who got prescriptions for the drugs in the 3 years before the change and the 3 years afterward. They also compared what happened to the 2 groups of patients to see how many died or needed to come back to the hospital for a heart problem during the following year.

What did the researchers find?

More patients received appropriate prescriptions during the 3 years after the form was changed than during the 3 years before the change. After the change, fewer patients died or had to come back to the hospital for heart problems within a year of being sent home.

What are the limitations of the study?

The observed improvements may have been due to general improvements in the care of patients with heart disease over time rather than to the new hospital discharge form. Also, the researchers did not have the complete information on each patient that would have allowed them to find other possible explanations for the improvements.

What are the implications of the study?

A simple change to a standard hospital form is an inexpensive and potentially effective way for hospitals to ensure that patients with heart disease leave the hospital while taking appropriate drugs.

Figures

Tables

References

Letters

NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s “Cited By” API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).
Compression-Only CPR: Pushing the Science Forward
Cone
AAM 2010;304:1493-1495.
All you need to read in the other general jounals
BMJ 2010;341:c5893-c1494.

Comments

Submit a Comment
Submit a Comment

Summary for Patients

Clinical Slide Sets

Terms of Use

The In the Clinic® slide sets are owned and copyrighted by the American College of Physicians (ACP). All text, graphics, trademarks, and other intellectual property incorporated into the slide sets remain the sole and exclusive property of the ACP. The slide sets may be used only by the person who downloads or purchases them and only for the purpose of presenting them during not-for-profit educational activities. Users may incorporate the entire slide set or selected individual slides into their own teaching presentations but may not alter the content of the slides in any way or remove the ACP copyright notice. Users may make print copies for use as hand-outs for the audience the user is personally addressing but may not otherwise reproduce or distribute the slides by any means or media, including but not limited to sending them as e-mail attachments, posting them on Internet or Intranet sites, publishing them in meeting proceedings, or making them available for sale or distribution in any unauthorized form, without the express written permission of the ACP. Unauthorized use of the In the Clinic slide sets will constitute copyright infringement.

Toolkit

Buy This Article

to gain full access to the content and tools.

Want to Subscribe?

Learn more about subscription options

Register Now for a free account
Advertisement

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Topic Collections
PubMed Articles
The development of Terminalia chebula Retz. (Combretaceae) in clinical research.
Asian Pacific journal of tropical biomedicine Issue date: 2013 Mar
Evaluation of MycAssay™ Aspergillus for Diagnosis of Invasive Pulmonary Aspergillosis in Patients without Hematological Cancer.
PloS one Issue date: 2013

Annals of Internal Medicine

Other Resources

Copyright © 2013 The American College of Physicians. All Rights Reserved.
Print ISSN: 0003-4819 | Online ISSN: 1539-3704

Buy This Article

to gain full access to the content and tools.

Want to Subscribe?

Learn more about subscription options

Register Now for a free account
Forgot your password?
Enter your username and email address. We'll send you a reminder to the email address on record.
(Required)
(Required)