Download citation file:
From University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York; Weill Medical College of Cornell University, White Plains, New York; University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; and University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Grant Support: PROSPECT is a collaborative research study funded by the National Institute of Mental Health. The 3 collaborative sites include the Advanced Centers for Intervention and Services Research of Cornell University (R01 MH59366, P30 MH68638), the University of Pennsylvania (R01 MH59380, P30 MH52129), and the University of Pittsburgh (R01 MH59381, P30 MH52247, P30 MH71944). Additional small grants came from Forest Laboratories and the John D. Hartford Foundation. Dr. Bruce is a recipient of National Institute of Mental Health grant NIMH K02 MH01634, and Dr. Lyness is supported by NIMH R01 MH61429 and K24 MH71509 from the Institute.
Potential Financial Conflicts of Interest: Consultancies: G.S. Alexopoulos (Forest Pharmaceuticals); Honoraria: G.S. Alexopoulos (Forest Pharmaceuticals, Janssen, Cephalon, Pfizer Inc., Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly Inc., Glaxo Wellcome); Grants received: G.S. Alexopoulos (Forest Pharmaceuticals, Cephalon); Other (tablets and placebos): C.F. Reynolds III (Forest Pharmaceuticals, GlaxoSmithKline, Pfizer Inc., Eli Lilly Inc.).
Requests for Single Reprints: Jeffrey M. Lyness, MD, Department of Psychiatry, University of Rochester Medical Center, 300 Crittenden Boulevard, Rochester, NY 14642; e-mail, Jeffrey_Lyness@urmc.rochester.edu.
Current Author Addresses: Dr. Lyness: Department of Psychiatry, University of Rochester Medical Center, 300 Crittenden Boulevard, Rochester, NY 14642.
Drs. Heo, Alexopoulos, and Bruce: New York Hospital Cornell Medical Center, 21 Bloomingdale Road, White Plains, NY 10605.
Drs. Datto, Ten Have, and Katz: University of Pennsylvania, 3535 Market Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104.
Drs. Drayer and Reynolds: Western Psychiatric Institute and Clinic, 3811 O'Hara Street, Pittsburgh, PA 15213.
Author Contributions: Conception and design: J.M. Lyness, T.R.Ten Have, I.R. Katz, C.F. Reynolds III, G.S. Alexopoulos, M.L. Bruce.
Analysis and interpretation of the data: J.M. Lyness, M. Heo, C.J. Datto, R. Drayer, I.R. Katz, M.L. Bruce.
Drafting of the article: J.M. Lyness, C.J. Datto, C.F. Reynolds III, G.S. Alexopoulos, M.L. Bruce.
Critical revision of the article for important intellectual content: J.M. Lyness, M. Heo, T.R.Ten Have, C.J. Datto, R. Drayer, C.F. Reynolds III, G.S. Alexopoulos, I.R. Katz, M.L. Bruce.
Final approval of the article: J.M. Lyness, M. Heo, T.R.Ten Have, C.J. Datto, C.F. Reynolds III, G.S. Alexopoulos, I.R. Katz, M.L. Bruce.
Provision of study materials or patients: C.F. Reynolds III, G.S. Alexopoulos, I.R. Katz, M.L. Bruce.
Statistical expertise: T.R.Ten Have, M. Heo.
Obtaining of funding: T.R.Ten Have, C.F. Reynolds III, G.S. Alexopoulos, I.R. Katz, M.L. Bruce.
Administrative, technical, or logistic support: I.R. Katz, M.L. Bruce.
Collection and assembly of data: C.J. Datto, G.S. Alexopoulos, I.R. Katz, M.L. Bruce.
We confirmed some but not all of our study hypotheses. Elderly patients with minor or subsyndromal depression had better outcomes than patients with major depression and poorer outcomes than persons who were not depressed. This group had a risk for a diagnosis of major depression at 1 year that was more than 5 times greater than that of nondepressed elderly individuals, which is similar to the 1-year risk in younger adults with subsyndromal depression (56). Furthermore, the group with minor and subsyndromal depression had greater functional disability at 1 year; however, these patients were not as disabled as those in the major depression group. Of interest, the minor depression and non–DSM-IV subsyndromal depression subgroups did not differ substantially in their outcomes. These data support the clinical importance of both minor and subsyndromal depression and suggest that, as in younger persons, they represent part of a spectrum of depression severity rather than a discrete entity.
Please read the other comments before posting. Contributors must reveal any conflict
Comments are moderated and will appear on the site at the discretion of The American
College of Physicians editorial staff. Please be sure your email address is
updated in your account, otherwise the American College of Physicians will not be
able to contact you about your comment.
* = Required Field
Disclosure of Any Conflicts of Interest*
(applies to the past 5 years and foreseeable future) Indicate any potential conflicts
of interest of each author below, including specific financial interests and relationships
and affiliations relevant to the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript
(eg, employment/affiliation, grants or funding, consultancies, honoraria, speakers
bureau, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, royalties, donation of medical
equipment, or patents filed, received, or pending). If all authors have none, check
"No potential conflicts or relevant financial interests" in the box below. Please
also indicate any funding received in support of this work. The information will
be posted with your response.
Outcomes of Patients with Mild Depression after 1 Year
The summary below is from the full report titled “Outcomes of Minor and Subsyndromal Depression among Elderly Patients in Primary Care Settings.” It is in the 4 April 2006 issue of Annals of InternalMedicine (volume 144, pages 496-504). The authors are J.M. Lyness, M. Heo, C.J. Datto, T.R. Ten Have, I.R. Katz, R. Drayer, C.F. Reynolds III, G.S. Alexopoulos, and M.L. Bruce.
The In the Clinic® slide sets are owned and copyrighted by the American College
of Physicians (ACP). All text, graphics, trademarks, and other intellectual property
incorporated into the slide sets remain the sole and exclusive property of the ACP.
The slide sets may be used only by the person who downloads or purchases them and
only for the purpose of presenting them during not-for-profit educational activities.
Users may incorporate the entire slide set or selected individual slides into their
own teaching presentations but may not alter the content of the slides in any way
or remove the ACP copyright notice. Users may make print copies for use as hand-outs
for the audience the user is personally addressing but may not otherwise reproduce
or distribute the slides by any means or media, including but not limited to sending
them as e-mail attachments, posting them on Internet or Intranet sites, publishing
them in meeting proceedings, or making them available for sale or distribution in
any unauthorized form, without the express written permission of the ACP. Unauthorized
use of the In the Clinic slide sets will constitute copyright infringement.
to gain full access to the content and tools.
Learn more about subscription options