Summaries for Patients |

Medical Errors That Lead to Missed Diagnoses in Primary Care FREE

[+] Article, Author, and Disclosure Information

The summary below is from the full report titled “Missed and Delayed Diagnoses in the Ambulatory Setting: A Study of Closed Malpractice Claims.” It is in the 3 October 2006 issue of Annals of Internal Medicine (volume 145, pages 488-496). The authors are T.K. Gandhi, A. Kachalia, E.J. Thomas, A.L. Puopolo, C. Yoon, T.A. Brennan, and D.M. Studdert.

Ann Intern Med. 2006;145(7):I-12. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-145-7-200610030-00002
Text Size: A A A

What is the problem and what is known about it so far?

Errors are common in medicine and are a focus of efforts to improve health care quality. Very little of the recent attention on medical errors has focused on those that occur around diagnosis. It is not uncommon for persons to discover that they have a condition that their doctor missed. Although each person with a missed diagnosis knows his or her individual story, the reasons for missed diagnoses from the perspective of the health care system have rarely been studied.

Why did the researchers do this particular study?

To understand the reasons for missed diagnoses so that they might be prevented.

Who was studied?

181 patients who filed malpractice claims alleging injury from a missed or delayed diagnosis.

How was the study done?

The researchers characterized diagnosis as a series of processes, such as ordering a test or acting on its results. They reviewed the malpractice claims to find those in which an error led to a missed or delayed diagnosis. They then tried to discover the reasons for the error and where and why the diagnostic process broke down.

What did the researchers find?

Cancer was the most commonly missed diagnosis. Most errors occurred at 4 main “breakdown” points in the diagnostic process. In over half of the cases, a proper diagnostic test was not performed. Sometimes test results were not followed up adequately, or the provider did not obtain adequate information from the patient or perform an adequate physical examination. Also, providers often incorrectly interpreted results. In most cases, more than 1 breakdown and more than 1 provider contributed to a missed diagnosis. Patients also contributed to the errors in a substantial number of cases, by, for example, not providing complete information about their health or not keeping an appointment.

What were the limitations of the study?

The study relied on malpractice claims, which do not represent the full range or nature of diagnostic errors. The study involved judgments about errors and their causes, and sometimes people disagreed in those judgments. The study focused on errors made in primary care settings and does not apply to emergency departments or other settings.

What are the implications of the study?

Errors in diagnosis are not often caused by the failures of a single doctor. Instead, they usually have several sources and involve several providers. These findings highlight the challenge of finding effective ways to reduce diagnostic errors as a component of improving health care quality.





Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).


Submit a Comment/Letter
Submit a Comment/Letter

Summary for Patients

Clinical Slide Sets

Terms of Use

The In the Clinic® slide sets are owned and copyrighted by the American College of Physicians (ACP). All text, graphics, trademarks, and other intellectual property incorporated into the slide sets remain the sole and exclusive property of the ACP. The slide sets may be used only by the person who downloads or purchases them and only for the purpose of presenting them during not-for-profit educational activities. Users may incorporate the entire slide set or selected individual slides into their own teaching presentations but may not alter the content of the slides in any way or remove the ACP copyright notice. Users may make print copies for use as hand-outs for the audience the user is personally addressing but may not otherwise reproduce or distribute the slides by any means or media, including but not limited to sending them as e-mail attachments, posting them on Internet or Intranet sites, publishing them in meeting proceedings, or making them available for sale or distribution in any unauthorized form, without the express written permission of the ACP. Unauthorized use of the In the Clinic slide sets will constitute copyright infringement.


Want to Subscribe?

Learn more about subscription options

Related Articles
Topic Collections
PubMed Articles
Forgot your password?
Enter your username and email address. We'll send you a reminder to the email address on record.