The full content of Annals is available to subscribers

Subscribe/Learn More  >
Editorials |

Career Changes in Medicine: Part II

Harold C. Sox, MD, Editor
[+] Article, Author, and Disclosure Information

From the American College of Physicians, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

Potential Financial Conflicts of Interest: None disclosed.

Requests for Single Reprints: Customer Service, American College of Physicians, 190 N. Independence Mall West, Philadelphia, PA 19106.

Ann Intern Med. 2006;145(10):782-783. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-145-10-200611210-00012
Text Size: A A A

We have known for some time that fewer medical students (1) and internal medicine residents (2) are deciding on careers in primary care. Of the several factors contributing to this trend, experiences during medical school and residency are probably important, but we have a limited understanding of which experiences are decisive. Experiences in practice also contribute. Earlier this year, Annals of Internal Medicine published an article showing that many board-certified internists were leaving general internal medicine (GIM) (34). As we try to transform primary care into a desirable career choice, we need to know more about when students and residents make their decisions and why they choose primary care (or why they do not). An article in this issue by West and colleagues (5) helps fill this important gap. It allows us to follow the career preferences of a large cohort of residents in each of the 3 years of residency. The findings suggest to me that GIM starts at a disadvantage but competes well over the 3 years of residency training.

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview





Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).


Submit a Comment/Letter
The Decline of Primary Care
Posted on December 10, 2006
Steven D Grant
No Affiliation
Conflict of Interest: None Declared

In the editorial Career Changes in Medicine:II (21 November2006/Volume 145 Issue 10/ Pages 782-783), Dr. Sox asks where is the lesion? This is referring to the fact that only 19% of first year residents plan to become general internists. He looks at the numbers in the article by West and his colleagues, and wonders if the problem lies in the medical school experience or the internal medicine residency.

As the President and CEO of the largest independent physician organization in southeast Michigan, and a clinical assistant professor at Wayne State University Medical School, I have been watching this trend for several years. I continue to practice general internal medicine, and, regularly, have third and fourth year students rotate through my office. These students confirm what I have believed for years. It is the money, stupid. The supposed experts can pontificate about the possible causes, but they will continue to miss the mark.

Although a certain percentage of medical students will become general internists because they truly like the field, until the income issue is solved the ranks of the primary care physicians will continue to dwindle. As long as pcp`s make a fraction of what most specialists make, there will be a major problem.

I do not have the answer, but I do know that a medical home or a 5% increase in the E/M codes are just bandaids. A bolder solution is needed. Unfortunately, there is nothing on the horizon.

Conflict of Interest:

None declared

Submit a Comment/Letter

Summary for Patients

Clinical Slide Sets

Terms of Use

The In the Clinic® slide sets are owned and copyrighted by the American College of Physicians (ACP). All text, graphics, trademarks, and other intellectual property incorporated into the slide sets remain the sole and exclusive property of the ACP. The slide sets may be used only by the person who downloads or purchases them and only for the purpose of presenting them during not-for-profit educational activities. Users may incorporate the entire slide set or selected individual slides into their own teaching presentations but may not alter the content of the slides in any way or remove the ACP copyright notice. Users may make print copies for use as hand-outs for the audience the user is personally addressing but may not otherwise reproduce or distribute the slides by any means or media, including but not limited to sending them as e-mail attachments, posting them on Internet or Intranet sites, publishing them in meeting proceedings, or making them available for sale or distribution in any unauthorized form, without the express written permission of the ACP. Unauthorized use of the In the Clinic slide sets will constitute copyright infringement.


Buy Now for $32.00

to gain full access to the content and tools.

Want to Subscribe?

Learn more about subscription options

Related Articles
Journal Club
Topic Collections
PubMed Articles
Forgot your password?
Enter your username and email address. We'll send you a reminder to the email address on record.